IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v260y2017i3p1069-1080.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An interdiction game on a queueing network with multiple intruders

Author

Listed:
  • Laan, Corine M.
  • van der Mijden, Tom
  • Barros, Ana Isabel
  • Boucherie, Richard J.
  • Monsuur, Herman

Abstract

Security forces are deployed to protect networks that are threatened by multiple intruders. To select the best deployment strategy, we analyze an interdiction game that considers multiple simultaneous threats. Intruders route through the network as regular customers, while interdictors arrive at specific nodes as negative customers. When an interdictor arrives at a node where an intruder is present, the intruder is removed from the network. Intruders and interdictors compete over the value of this network, which is the throughput of unintercepted intruders. Intruders attempt to maximize this throughput by selecting a fixed route through the network, while the interdictors aim to minimize the throughput selecting their arrival rate at each node. We analyze this game and characterize optimal strategies. For special cases, we obtain explicit formulas to evaluate the optimal strategies and use these to compute optimal strategies for general networks. We also consider the network with probabilistic routing of intruders and show that for this case, the value and optimal strategies of the interdictor of the resulting game remain the same.

Suggested Citation

  • Laan, Corine M. & van der Mijden, Tom & Barros, Ana Isabel & Boucherie, Richard J. & Monsuur, Herman, 2017. "An interdiction game on a queueing network with multiple intruders," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 1069-1080.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:260:y:2017:i:3:p:1069-1080
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.02.035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221717301571
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.02.035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alan Washburn & Kevin Wood, 1995. "Two-Person Zero-Sum Games for Network Interdiction," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 243-251, April.
    2. Lyn C. Thomas & Alan R. Washburn, 1991. "Dynamic Search Games," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 415-422, June.
    3. Gerald Brown & Matthew Carlyle & Javier Salmerón & Kevin Wood, 2006. "Defending Critical Infrastructure," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 530-544, December.
    4. Alpern, Steven & Morton, Alec & Papadaki, Katerina, 2011. "Patrolling games," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 32210, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Kelly J. Cormican & David P. Morton & R. Kevin Wood, 1998. "Stochastic Network Interdiction," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 184-197, April.
    6. Steve Alpern & Alec Morton & Katerina Papadaki, 2011. "Patrolling Games," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1246-1257, October.
    7. Richard Wollmer, 1964. "Removing Arcs from a Network," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(6), pages 934-940, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Corine M. Laan & Judith Timmer & Richard J. Boucherie, 2021. "Non-cooperative queueing games on a network of single server queues," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 97(3), pages 279-301, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yan, Xihong & Ren, Xiaorong & Nie, Xiaofeng, 2022. "A budget allocation model for domestic airport network protection," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    2. Smith, J. Cole & Song, Yongjia, 2020. "A survey of network interdiction models and algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 797-811.
    3. Leonardo Lozano & J. Cole Smith, 2017. "A Backward Sampling Framework for Interdiction Problems with Fortification," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 123-139, February.
    4. Baykal-Gürsoy, Melike & Duan, Zhe & Poor, H. Vincent & Garnaev, Andrey, 2014. "Infrastructure security games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 469-478.
    5. Nguyen, Di H. & Smith, J. Cole, 2022. "Network interdiction with asymmetric cost uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 239-251.
    6. Chaya Losada & M. Scaparra & Richard Church & Mark Daskin, 2012. "The stochastic interdiction median problem with disruption intensity levels," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 201(1), pages 345-365, December.
    7. Bloch, Francis & Chatterjee, Kalyan & Dutta, Bhaskar, 2023. "Attack and interception in networks," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 18(4), November.
    8. Starita, Stefano & Scaparra, Maria Paola, 2016. "Optimizing dynamic investment decisions for railway systems protection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 543-557.
    9. Pengfei Zhang & Neng Fan, 2017. "Analysis of budget for interdiction on multicommodity network flows," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 67(3), pages 495-525, March.
    10. Dimitris Bertsimas & Ebrahim Nasrabadi & Sebastian Stiller, 2013. "Robust and Adaptive Network Flows," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1218-1242, October.
    11. Kübra Tanınmış & Markus Sinnl, 2022. "A Branch-and-Cut Algorithm for Submodular Interdiction Games," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2634-2657, September.
    12. Paola Cappanera & Maria Paola Scaparra, 2011. "Optimal Allocation of Protective Resources in Shortest-Path Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(1), pages 64-80, February.
    13. Parajuli, Anubhuti & Kuzgunkaya, Onur & Vidyarthi, Navneet, 2017. "Responsive contingency planning of capacitated supply networks under disruption risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 13-37.
    14. Le Thi Khanh Hien & Melvyn Sim & Huan Xu, 2020. "Mitigating Interdiction Risk with Fortification," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 348-362, March.
    15. Ramamoorthy, Prasanna & Jayaswal, Sachin & Sinha, Ankur & Vidyarthi, Navneet, 2018. "Multiple allocation hub interdiction and protection problems: Model formulations and solution approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(1), pages 230-245.
    16. Matteo Fischetti & Ivana Ljubić & Michele Monaci & Markus Sinnl, 2019. "Interdiction Games and Monotonicity, with Application to Knapsack Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 390-410, April.
    17. Eli Towle & James Luedtke, 2018. "New solution approaches for the maximum-reliability stochastic network interdiction problem," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 455-477, October.
    18. Zhang, Jing & Zhuang, Jun & Behlendorf, Brandon, 2018. "Stochastic shortest path network interdiction with a case study of Arizona–Mexico border," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 62-73.
    19. Brian Lunday & Hanif Sherali, 2012. "Network interdiction to minimize the maximum probability of evasion with synergy between applied resources," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 411-442, July.
    20. Shen, Yeming & Sharkey, Thomas C. & Szymanski, Boleslaw K. & Wallace, William (Al), 2021. "Interdicting interdependent contraband smuggling, money and money laundering networks," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:260:y:2017:i:3:p:1069-1080. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.