IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v68y2020i2p552-571.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fast or Slow: Search in Discrete Locations with Two Search Modes

Author

Listed:
  • Jake Clarkson

    (STOR-i Centre for Doctoral Training, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YR, United Kingdom)

  • Kevin D. Glazebrook

    (Department of Management Science, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YX, United Kingdom)

  • Kyle Y. Lin

    (Operations Research Department, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California 93943)

Abstract

An object is hidden in one of several discrete locations according to some known probability distribution, and the goal is to discover the object in the minimum expected time by successive searches of individual locations. If there is only one way to search each location, this search problem is solved using Gittins indices. Motivated by modern search technology, we extend earlier work to allow two modes—fast and slow—to search each location. The fast mode takes less time, but the slow mode is more likely to find the object. An optimal policy is difficult to obtain in general, because it requires an optimal sequence of search modes for each location in addition to a set of sequence-dependent Gittins indices for choosing between locations. Our analysis begins by—for each mode—identifying a sufficient condition for a location to use only that search mode in an optimal policy. For locations meeting neither sufficient condition, an optimal choice of search mode is extremely complicated, depending on both the probability distribution of the object’s hiding location and the search parameters of the other locations. We propose several heuristic policies motivated by our analysis and demonstrate their near-optimal performance in an extensive numerical study.

Suggested Citation

  • Jake Clarkson & Kevin D. Glazebrook & Kyle Y. Lin, 2020. "Fast or Slow: Search in Discrete Locations with Two Search Modes," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 552-571, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:68:y:2020:i:2:p:552-571
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2019.1870
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2019.1870
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2019.1870?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sheldon M. Ross, 1969. "A Problem in Optimal Search and Stop," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(6), pages 984-992, December.
    2. Moshe Kress & Kyle Lin & Roberto Szechtman, 2008. "Optimal discrete search with imperfect specificity," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 68(3), pages 539-549, December.
    3. Ingo Wegener, 1980. "The Discrete Sequential Search Problem with Nonrandom Cost and Overlook Probabilities," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 373-380, August.
    4. Milton C. Chew, 1973. "Optimal Stopping in a Discrete Search Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 741-747, June.
    5. Joseph B. Kadane, 1971. "Optimal Whereabouts Search," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 894-904, August.
    6. Steve Alpern & Thomas Lidbetter, 2015. "Optimal Trade-Off Between Speed and Acuity When Searching for a Small Object," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(1), pages 122-133, February.
    7. Alpern, Steven & Lidbetter, Thomas, 2015. "Optimal trade-off between speed and acuity when searching for a small object," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 61504, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steven M. Shechter & Farhad Ghassemi & Yasin Gocgun & Martin L. Puterman, 2015. "Technical Note—Trading Off Quick versus Slow Actions in Optimal Search," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(2), pages 353-362, April.
    2. Joseph Kadane, 2015. "Optimal discrete search with technological choice," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 81(3), pages 317-336, June.
    3. Steve Alpern & Thomas Lidbetter, 2019. "Approximate solutions for expanding search games on general networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 275(2), pages 259-279, April.
    4. Michael Atkinson & Moshe Kress & Rutger-Jan Lange, 2016. "When Is Information Sufficient for Action? Search with Unreliable yet Informative Intelligence," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 315-328, April.
    5. Yolmeh, Abdolmajid & Baykal-Gürsoy, Melike, 2021. "Weighted network search games with multiple hidden objects and multiple search teams," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(1), pages 338-349.
    6. Moshe Kress & Kyle Lin & Roberto Szechtman, 2008. "Optimal discrete search with imperfect specificity," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 68(3), pages 539-549, December.
    7. Lidbetter, Thomas, 2020. "Search and rescue in the face of uncertain threats," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 1153-1160.
    8. Lidbetter, Thomas, 2017. "On the approximation ratio of the Random Chinese Postman Tour for network search," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 782-788.
    9. Baycik, N. Orkun & Sharkey, Thomas C. & Rainwater, Chase E., 2020. "A Markov Decision Process approach for balancing intelligence and interdiction operations in city-level drug trafficking enforcement," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    10. Joseph B. Kadane, 2015. "Optimal discrete search with technological choice," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 81(3), pages 317-336, June.
    11. Stanley J. Benkoski & Michael G. Monticino & James R. Weisinger, 1991. "A survey of the search theory literature," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(4), pages 469-494, August.
    12. Alpern, Steve & Fokkink, Robbert & Simanjuntak, Martin, 2016. "Optimal search and ambush for a hider who can escape the search region," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(3), pages 707-714.
    13. Baston, Vic & Kikuta, Kensaku, 2019. "A search problem on a bipartite network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(1), pages 227-237.
    14. Lisa Hellerstein & Thomas Lidbetter & Daniel Pirutinsky, 2019. "Solving Zero-Sum Games Using Best-Response Oracles with Applications to Search Games," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 731-743, May.
    15. Steve Alpern, 2017. "Hide-and-Seek Games on a Network, Using Combinatorial Search Paths," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1207-1214, October.
    16. Garrec, Tristan & Scarsini, Marco, 2020. "Search for an immobile hider on a stochastic network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(2), pages 783-794.
    17. T. C. E. Cheng & B. Kriheli & E. Levner & C. T. Ng, 2021. "Scheduling an autonomous robot searching for hidden targets," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 298(1), pages 95-109, March.
    18. Kress, M. & Royset, J.O. & Rozen, N., 2012. "The eye and the fist: Optimizing search and interdiction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 550-558.
    19. Yan Xia & Rajan Batta & Rakesh Nagi, 2017. "Controlling a Fleet of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles to Collect Uncertain Information in a Threat Environment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 674-692, June.
    20. Wilson, Kurt E. & Szechtman, Roberto & Atkinson, Michael P., 2011. "A sequential perspective on searching for static targets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(1), pages 218-226, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:68:y:2020:i:2:p:552-571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.