IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v482y2023ics0304380023001151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological network identification and connectivity robustness evaluation in the Yellow River Basin under a multi-scenario simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Men, Dan
  • Pan, Jinghu

Abstract

The deterioration of the environment has been aggravated by the rapid growth of cities and economies, and inter-regional political, economic, scientific, and technological frictions caused by ecological problems are increasing. To safeguard the ecological environment and design healthy urban development, it is crucial to assess the structure and quality of ecological networks (ENs), which serve as links between landscape structure and ecological processes. This paper simulates land use in 2035 under three development scenarios for the Yellow River Basin (YRB), identifying ENs, and assessing the robustness of network connectivity for each scenario. We found that in the ecological protection scenario (ES), forest and water Land expanded the most, increasing by 4.16% and 6.98%, respectively. The ES also produced the most ecological patches (53) and important ecological corridors (141), with the important corridors forming an east–west spatial pattern. In the baseline scenario (BS), important corridors formed a north–south pattern, and in the urban development scenario (US), the important corridors were characterised by small-scale aggregation. The initial connectivity robustness of ENs was 0.5, 0.46, and 0.45 in the ES, BS, and US, respectively. Whether using deliberate or random attack models, the robustness of network connectivity was strongest in the ES. This study provides a theoretical reference for the future planning of eco-friendly development and ecological security patterns in the YRB.

Suggested Citation

  • Men, Dan & Pan, Jinghu, 2023. "Ecological network identification and connectivity robustness evaluation in the Yellow River Basin under a multi-scenario simulation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 482(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:482:y:2023:i:c:s0304380023001151
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380023001151
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110384?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Pengyan & Yang, Dan & Qin, Mingzhou & Jing, Wenlong, 2020. "Spatial heterogeneity analysis and driving forces exploring of built-up land development intensity in Chinese prefecture-level cities and implications for future Urban Land intensive use," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Dupras, Jerôme & Marull, Joan & Parcerisas, Lluís & Coll, Francesc & Gonzalez, Andrew & Girard, Marc & Tello, Enric, 2016. "The impacts of urban sprawl on ecological connectivity in the Montreal Metropolitan Region," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 61-73.
    3. Su, Kai & Yu, Qiang & Yue, Depeng & Zhang, Qibin & Yang, Lan & Liu, Zhili & Niu, Teng & Sun, Xiaoting, 2019. "Simulation of a forest-grass ecological network in a typical desert oasis based on multiple scenes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 413(C).
    4. Sadooghi, Seyed Ehsan & Taleai, Mohammad & Abolhasani, Somaie, 2022. "Simulation of urban growth scenarios using integration of multi-criteria analysis and game theory," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    5. Simon L. Lewis & Mark A. Maslin, 2015. "Defining the Anthropocene," Nature, Nature, vol. 519(7542), pages 171-180, March.
    6. De Montis, Andrea & Ganciu, Amedeo & Cabras, Matteo & Bardi, Antonietta & Mulas, Maurizio, 2019. "Comparative ecological network analysis: An application to Italy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 714-724.
    7. Robert Pontius & Wideke Boersma & Jean-Christophe Castella & Keith Clarke & Ton Nijs & Charles Dietzel & Zengqiang Duan & Eric Fotsing & Noah Goldstein & Kasper Kok & Eric Koomen & Christopher Lippitt, 2008. "Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 42(1), pages 11-37, March.
    8. Upadhyay, Shashankaditya & Roy, Arijit & Ramprakash, M. & Idiculla, Jobin & Kumar, A. Senthil & Bhattacharya, Sudeepto, 2017. "A network theoretic study of ecological connectivity in Western Himalayas," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 359(C), pages 246-257.
    9. Jin, Hong & Li, Heping & Lee, Jia & Sun, Weitong, 2023. "Simulation analysis of rural land use using rate of change driven by population and economic dynamics - A case study of Huangguashan village in Chongqing, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 475(C).
    10. De Montis, Andrea & Ganciu, Amedeo & Cabras, Matteo & Bardi, Antonietta & Peddio, Valentina & Caschili, Simone & Massa, Pierangelo & Cocco, Chiara & Mulas, Maurizio, 2019. "Resilient ecological networks: A comparative approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    11. Lei Gao & Brett A. Bryan, 2017. "Finding pathways to national-scale land-sector sustainability," Nature, Nature, vol. 544(7649), pages 217-222, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wenhao Cheng & Caihong Ma & Tongsheng Li & Yuanyuan Liu, 2024. "Construction of Ecological Security Patterns and Evaluation of Ecological Network Stability under Multi-Scenario Simulation: A Case Study in Desert–Oasis Area of the Yellow River Basin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Wenhao Cheng & Caihong Ma, 2024. "Construction and Evaluation of Urban Green Infrastructure in Ecologically Vulnerable Areas Based on Multi-Scale and Multi-Objective Approaches: Taking the Four-Lake Hydrographic Network in the Upper Y," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Wei, Zhongyong & Liu, Tao & Liang, Huaixiang & Zhang, Zhe & Wang, Chunhui & Lv, Yadong & Sun, Jizhe & Wang, Qi, 2024. "Uncovering the impacts of LUCC on ecological connectivity in suburban open-pit mining concentration areas: A pattern collection of changing relationships between ecological resistance and ecological n," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 496(C).
    4. Haoran Fan & Qi Si & Wenming Dong & Gang Lu & Xinping Liu, 2023. "Land Use Change and Landscape Ecological Risk Prediction in Urumqi under the Shared Socio-Economic Pathways and the Representative Concentration Pathways (SSP-RCP) Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-21, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jianfeng Zhu & Lijun Yu & Yueping Nie & Fang Liu & Yu Sun & Yuanzhi Zhang & Wenping Song, 2019. "Ancient Environmental Preference and the Site Selection Pattern Based on the Edge Effect and Network Structure in An Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Haozhe Zhang & Qingyuan Yang & Huiming Zhang & Lulu Zhou & Hongji Chen, 2021. "Optimization of Land Use Based on the Source and Sink Landscape of Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of Fengdu County in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-24, November.
    3. Di Zhou & Wei Song, 2021. "Identifying Ecological Corridors and Networks in Mountainous Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Lu, Yanchi & Huang, Dan & Liu, Yaolin & Zhang, Yan & Jing, Ying & Chen, Huiting & Zhang, Ziyi & Liu, Yanfang, 2024. "Exploring the optimization and management methods of ecological networks based on the cluster mode: A case study of Wuhan Metropolis, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    5. Tironi, Martín & Rivera Lisboa, Diego Ignacio, 2023. "Artificial intelligence in the new forms of environmental governance in the Chilean State: Towards an eco-algorithmic governance," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    6. Yang, Yuanyuan & Bao, Wenkai & Liu, Yansui, 2020. "Scenario simulation of land system change in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    7. Aritta Suwarno & Meine van Noordwijk & Hans-Peter Weikard & Desi Suyamto, 2018. "Indonesia’s forest conversion moratorium assessed with an agent-based model of Land-Use Change and Ecosystem Services (LUCES)," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 211-229, February.
    8. Maggie MacKinnon & Maibritt Pedersen Zari & Daniel K. Brown, 2023. "Improving Urban Habitat Connectivity for Native Birds: Using Least-Cost Path Analyses to Design Urban Green Infrastructure Networks," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Felipe Vásquez & Gibran Vita & Daniel B. Müller, 2018. "Food Security for an Aging and Heavier Population," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    10. Marco Filippo Torchio & Umberto Lucia & Giulia Grisolia, 2020. "Economic and Human Features for Energy and Environmental Indicators: A Tool to Assess Countries’ Progress towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    11. Yusuyunjiang Mamitimin & Zibibula Simayi & Ayinuer Mamat & Bumairiyemu Maimaiti & Yunfei Ma, 2023. "FLUS Based Modeling of the Urban LULC in Arid and Semi-Arid Region of Northwest China: A Case Study of Urumqi City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, March.
    12. Enrico Gottero & Claudia Cassatella & Federica Larcher, 2021. "Planning Peri-Urban Open Spaces: Methods and Tools for Interpretation and Classification," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, July.
    13. Hong Shi & Ji Yang & Qijuan Liu & Taohong Li & Ning Chris Chen, 2024. "Impacts of Climate and Land-Use Change on Fraction Vegetation Coverage Based on PLUS-Dimidiate Pixel Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Rachel Mazac & Hanna L. Tuomisto, 2020. "The Post-Anthropocene Diet: Navigating Future Diets for Sustainable Food Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, March.
    15. Ju-Sung Lee & Tatiana Filatova & Arika Ligmann-Zielinska & Behrooz Hassani-Mahmooei & Forrest Stonedahl & Iris Lorscheid & Alexey Voinov & J. Gareth Polhill & Zhanli Sun & Dawn C. Parker, 2015. "The Complexities of Agent-Based Modeling Output Analysis," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 18(4), pages 1-4.
    16. Li, Xiaoliang & Wu, Kening & Yang, Qijun & Hao, Shiheng & Feng, Zhe & Ma, Jinliang, 2023. "Quantitative assessment of cultivated land use intensity in Heilongjiang Province, China, 2001–2015," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    17. Margaret Gitau & Nathaniel Bailey, 2012. "Multi-Layer Assessment of Land Use and Related Changes for Decision Support in a Coastal Zone Watershed," Land, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-27, December.
    18. Xiaoli Hu & Xin Li & Ling Lu, 2018. "Modeling the Land Use Change in an Arid Oasis Constrained by Water Resources and Environmental Policy Change Using Cellular Automata Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.
    19. Eva Michaeli & Vladimír Solár & Matúš Maxin & Jozef Vilček & Martin Boltižiar, 2021. "The Nature of the Technosols on the Waste from Nickel Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, January.
    20. Kaisa Vehmas & Nancy Bocken & Hannamaija Tuovila, 2024. "Understanding Consumer Attitudes Towards Sustainable Business Models—A Qualitative Study with Finnish Consumers," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 1487-1512, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:482:y:2023:i:c:s0304380023001151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.