IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v496y2024ics0304380024002035.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncovering the impacts of LUCC on ecological connectivity in suburban open-pit mining concentration areas: A pattern collection of changing relationships between ecological resistance and ecological network elements

Author

Listed:
  • Wei, Zhongyong
  • Liu, Tao
  • Liang, Huaixiang
  • Zhang, Zhe
  • Wang, Chunhui
  • Lv, Yadong
  • Sun, Jizhe
  • Wang, Qi

Abstract

The suburban open-pit mining concentration area couples two human activities, urban sprawl and open-pit mining, while destruction of surface vegetation and ecological restoration coexist. This has also resulted in complex land use shifts that significantly affect regional ecological connectivity. However, the impact of such complex Land use/land cover changes (LUCC) on ecological connectivity in this region is not well understood Therefore, this study takes the suburban open-pit mining concentration area of Jinan City as a case study and uses Land use/land cover (LULC) data from the years 2000, 2010, and 2020 to simulate the spatio-temporal evolution of ecological networks (ENs). Subsequently, a pattern collection of changing relationships was proposed that relate changes in ecological resistance to changes in EN elements, addressing the dynamic transmission process from "spatial field" to "spatial structure entity". Based on this approach, GeoDetector is employed to reveal the response extent of EN elements to LUCC. The results indicate: (1) In the past 20 years, the area of construction land has increased by 100 %, while mining land has increased by 69 %. This significant increase in LUCC has led to a notable enhancement in ecological resistance in the study area, driving the generation of 20 % more ecological pinch points and barriers. Additionally, it has resulted in a twofold increase in both the number and length of level 1 ecological corridors. (2) The dominant status and structure of grassland, agriculture land, and woodland remain relatively stable; however, the interflow among them has caused approximately 25 % of the ecological corridors to undergo changes such as disappearance and path alteration. (3) The implementation of ecological protection and restoration has led to a continuous increase in the area of ecological sources, particularly with the mining rehabilitation increasing by 32.7 times compared to 2000, thereby driving gradual improvement in 25 % of the ecological network elements. (4) Although the quantity and length of ecological corridors in the study area remain relatively stable, evaluation results indicate that its spatial structure is gradually deteriorating, with ecological connectivity decreasing by 7.7 %. This study highlights the importance of restoration of ecological processes in sub-urban open-pit mining concentration areas. The study results can provide a scientific basis for ecological restoration and sustainable development in resource-based cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei, Zhongyong & Liu, Tao & Liang, Huaixiang & Zhang, Zhe & Wang, Chunhui & Lv, Yadong & Sun, Jizhe & Wang, Qi, 2024. "Uncovering the impacts of LUCC on ecological connectivity in suburban open-pit mining concentration areas: A pattern collection of changing relationships between ecological resistance and ecological n," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 496(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:496:y:2024:i:c:s0304380024002035
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110815
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380024002035
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110815?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Feng & Ye, Yaping & Song, Bowen & Wang, Rusong, 2015. "Evaluation of urban suitable ecological land based on the minimum cumulative resistance model: A case study from Changzhou, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 194-203.
    2. Men, Dan & Pan, Jinghu, 2023. "Ecological network identification and connectivity robustness evaluation in the Yellow River Basin under a multi-scenario simulation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 482(C).
    3. Xu, Aokang & Hu, Mengjun & Shi, Jing & Bai, Qingzhu & Li, Xuehong, 2024. "Construction and optimization of ecological network in inland river basin based on circuit theory, complex network and ecological sensitivity: A case study of Gansu section of Heihe River Basin," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 488(C).
    4. He, Hui & Yu, Xiangke & Yu, Hui & Ma, Zhigang & Luo, Yong & Liu, Tao & Rong, Ziwei & Xu, Jinhong & Chen, Dianpeng & Li, Pengshang & Yuan, Fuxin & Zhao, Yongtao, 2024. "Suitable habitat evaluation and ecological security pattern optimization for the ecological restoration of Giant Panda habitat based on nonstationary factors and MCR model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 494(C).
    5. Shen, Jiake & Zhu, Wenjia & Peng, Zhenwei & Wang, Yuncai, 2023. "Improving landscape ecological network connectivity in urbanizing areas from dual dimensions of structure and function," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 482(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pan, Huanhuan & Du, Ziqiang & Wu, Zhitao & Zhang, Hong & Ma, Keming, 2024. "Building ecosystem services-based ecological networks in energy and chemical industry areas," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 498(C).
    2. Zhenzhen Yuan & Weijie Li & Yong Wang & Dayun Zhu & Qiuhong Wang & Yan Liu & Lingyan Zhou, 2022. "Ecosystem Health Evaluation and Ecological Security Patterns Construction Based on VORSD and Circuit Theory: A Case Study in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region in Chongqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Rong Guo & Tong Wu & Mengran Liu & Mengshi Huang & Luigi Stendardo & Yutong Zhang, 2019. "The Construction and Optimization of Ecological Security Pattern in the Harbin-Changchun Urban Agglomeration, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Yiming Wei & Hongwei Wang & Bo Tan & Mengqi Xue & Yucong Yin, 2022. "Analysis of the Spatial Differentiation and Development Optimization of Towns’ Livable Quality in Aksu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Haochen Yu & Jiu Huang & Chuning Ji & Zi’ao Li, 2021. "Construction of a Landscape Ecological Network for a Large-Scale Energy and Chemical Industrial Base: A Case Study of Ningdong, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-24, March.
    6. Lingfan Ju & Yan Liu & Jin Yang & Mingshun Xiang & Qing Xiang & Wenkai Hu & Zhengyi Ding, 2023. "Construction of Nature Reserves’ Ecological Security Pattern Based on Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment: A Case Study of Garze Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Caihong Yang & Huijun Guo & Xiaoyuan Huang & Yanxia Wang & Xiaona Li & Xinyuan Cui, 2022. "Ecological Network Construction of a National Park Based on MSPA and MCR Models: An Example of the Proposed National Parks of “Ailaoshan-Wuliangshan” in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, October.
    8. Zhang, Zuo & Li, Jiaming & Luo, Xiang & Li, Chongming & Zhang, Lu, 2020. "Urban lake spatial openness and relationship with neighboring land prices: Exploratory geovisual analytics for essential policy insights," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    9. Siyuan Wang & Minmin Zhao & Weicui Ding & Qiang Yang & Hao Li & Changqing Shao & Binghu Wang & Yi Liu, 2024. "Ecological Suitability Evaluation of City Construction Based on Landscape Ecological Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-16, October.
    10. Xiaoxia Su & Jing Wu & Pengshuo Li & Renjie Li & Penggen Cheng, 2022. "RSEI-Based Modeling of Ecological Security and Its Spatial Impacts on Soil Quality: A Case Study of Dayu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.
    11. Liu Yang & Mengmeng Suo & Shunqian Gao & Hongzan Jiao, 2022. "Construction of an Ecological Network Based on an Integrated Approach and Circuit Theory: A Case Study of Panzhou in Guizhou Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-29, July.
    12. Wenhao Cheng & Caihong Ma & Tongsheng Li & Yuanyuan Liu, 2024. "Construction of Ecological Security Patterns and Evaluation of Ecological Network Stability under Multi-Scenario Simulation: A Case Study in Desert–Oasis Area of the Yellow River Basin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, July.
    13. Ren Yang & Baoqing Qin & Yuancheng Lin, 2021. "Assessment of the Impact of Land Use Change on Spatial Differentiation of Landscape and Ecosystem Service Values in the Case of Study the Pearl River Delta in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    14. Guanglong Dong & Zhonghao Liu & Yuanzhao Niu & Wenya Jiang, 2022. "Identification of Land Use Conflicts in Shandong Province from an Ecological Security Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Ziyi Liu & Xiaoyu Gan & Weining Dai & Ying Huang, 2022. "Construction of an Ecological Security Pattern and the Evaluation of Corridor Priority Based on ESV and the “Importance–Connectivity” Index: A Case Study of Sichuan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-25, March.
    16. Jing Xie & Binggeng Xie & Kaichun Zhou & Junhan Li & Jianyong Xiao & Changchang Liu & Xuemao Zhang, 2023. "Multiple Probability Ecological Network and County-Scale Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, August.
    17. Wenting Zhang & Bo Li, 2021. "Research on an Analytical Framework for Urban Spatial Structural and Functional Optimisation: A Case Study of Beijing City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    18. Pingxing Li & Jinlong Gao & Jianglong Chen, 2020. "Quantitative assessment of ecological stress of construction lands by quantity and location: case study in Southern Jiangsu, Eastern China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1559-1578, February.
    19. Xiye Zheng & Jiahui Wu & Hongbing Deng, 2021. "Spatial Distribution and Land Use of Traditional Villages in Southwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, June.
    20. Haoran Fan & Qi Si & Wenming Dong & Gang Lu & Xinping Liu, 2023. "Land Use Change and Landscape Ecological Risk Prediction in Urumqi under the Shared Socio-Economic Pathways and the Representative Concentration Pathways (SSP-RCP) Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-21, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:496:y:2024:i:c:s0304380024002035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.