IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v81y2019icp714-724.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative ecological network analysis: An application to Italy

Author

Listed:
  • De Montis, Andrea
  • Ganciu, Amedeo
  • Cabras, Matteo
  • Bardi, Antonietta
  • Mulas, Maurizio

Abstract

Ecological networks (ENs), i.e. compounds of a set of patches interconnected through a set of corridors, are major strategies for counteracting landscape fragmentation in stressed urban, peri-urban and rural domains. They are adopted in many cases worldwide and their success or difficult rooting can be used as a living indicator of the inclination of human settlements to favour the development of green systems. We aim at constructing a network analysis method and testing it to the comparative study of two ENs to be developed in Sassari and Nuoro, Italy. We will study ENs with the same number of nodes, analyse the size of the patches, and scrutinize the main variables expressing the topological and weighted centrality. This approach allows us to locate the hotspots of the ENs, i.e. the places that need to be protected from external negative drivers. Results demonstrate that the method is useful, as it helps finding similarities and dissimilarities in different ecological systems and confirms that network analysis has very good potential when applied in a comparative modality.

Suggested Citation

  • De Montis, Andrea & Ganciu, Amedeo & Cabras, Matteo & Bardi, Antonietta & Mulas, Maurizio, 2019. "Comparative ecological network analysis: An application to Italy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 714-724.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:81:y:2019:i:c:p:714-724
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837718311840
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jordán, Ferenc & Benedek, Zsófia & Podani, János, 2007. "Quantifying positional importance in food webs: A comparison of centrality indices," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 205(1), pages 270-275.
    2. Borrett, Stuart R. & Moody, James & Edelmann, Achim, 2014. "The rise of Network Ecology: Maps of the topic diversity and scientific collaboration," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 293(C), pages 111-127.
    3. Fath, Brian D. & Scharler, Ursula M. & Ulanowicz, Robert E. & Hannon, Bruce, 2007. "Ecological network analysis: network construction," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 208(1), pages 49-55.
    4. Barabási, A.L & Jeong, H & Néda, Z & Ravasz, E & Schubert, A & Vicsek, T, 2002. "Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 311(3), pages 590-614.
    5. Steven H. Strogatz, 2001. "Exploring complex networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 410(6825), pages 268-276, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Julio Plaza Tabasco & Héctor S. Martínez Sánchez-Mateos, 2021. "Integration Versus Fragmentation, the Role of Minor Rural Networks in Rural Cultural Landscapes. A Study-Case in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    2. De Montis, Andrea & Ganciu, Amedeo & Cabras, Matteo & Bardi, Antonietta & Peddio, Valentina & Caschili, Simone & Massa, Pierangelo & Cocco, Chiara & Mulas, Maurizio, 2019. "Resilient ecological networks: A comparative approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Men, Dan & Pan, Jinghu, 2023. "Ecological network identification and connectivity robustness evaluation in the Yellow River Basin under a multi-scenario simulation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 482(C).
    4. Pătru-Stupariu, Ileana & Nita, Andreea & Mustăţea, Mihai & Huzui-Stoiculescu, Alina & Fürst, Christine, 2020. "Using social network methodological approach to better understand human–wildlife interactions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    5. Gao, Jing & Gong, Jian & Li, Yao & Yang, Jianxin & Liang, Xun, 2024. "Ecological network assessment in dynamic landscapes: Multi-scenario simulation and conservation priority analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    6. Enrico Gottero & Claudia Cassatella & Federica Larcher, 2021. "Planning Peri-Urban Open Spaces: Methods and Tools for Interpretation and Classification," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Jianfeng Zhu & Lijun Yu & Yueping Nie & Fang Liu & Yu Sun & Yuanzhi Zhang & Wenping Song, 2019. "Ancient Environmental Preference and the Site Selection Pattern Based on the Edge Effect and Network Structure in An Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    8. Antonio Ledda & Vittorio Serra & Andrea De Montis, 2019. "The Effect of Rural Buildings on Landscape Fragmentation in Natura 2000 Sites: A Case Study in Sardinia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-18, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Almpanidou, Vasiliki & Mazaris, Antonios D. & Mertzanis, Yorgos & Avraam, Ioannis & Antoniou, Ioannis & Pantis, John D. & Sgardelis, Stefanos P., 2014. "Providing insights on habitat connectivity for male brown bears: A combination of habitat suitability and landscape graph-based models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 286(C), pages 37-44.
    2. Borrett, Stuart R. & Sheble, Laura & Moody, James & Anway, Evan C., 2018. "Bibliometric review of ecological network analysis: 2010–2016," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 382(C), pages 63-82.
    3. Biao Xiong & Bixin Li & Rong Fan & Qingzhong Zhou & Wu Li, 2017. "Modeling and Simulation for Effectiveness Evaluation of Dynamic Discrete Military Supply Chain Networks," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-9, October.
    4. Mehmet N. Aydin & N. Ziya Perdahci, 2019. "Dynamic network analysis of online interactive platform," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 229-240, April.
    5. Selen Onel & Abe Zeid & Sagar Kamarthi, 2011. "The structure and analysis of nanotechnology co-author and citation networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 89(1), pages 119-138, October.
    6. Chen, Qinghua & Chen, Shenghui, 2007. "A highly clustered scale-free network evolved by random walking," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 383(2), pages 773-781.
    7. Kim, Daehyun & Phillips, Jonathan D., 2013. "Predicting the structure and mode of vegetation dynamics: An application of graph theory to state-and-transition models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 265(C), pages 64-73.
    8. Stefano Allesina & Mercedes Pascual, 2009. "Googling Food Webs: Can an Eigenvector Measure Species' Importance for Coextinctions?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-6, September.
    9. Gao, Cai & Wei, Daijun & Hu, Yong & Mahadevan, Sankaran & Deng, Yong, 2013. "A modified evidential methodology of identifying influential nodes in weighted networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(21), pages 5490-5500.
    10. Türker, İlker & Çavuşoğlu, Abdullah, 2016. "Detailing the co-authorship networks in degree coupling, edge weight and academic age perspective," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 386-392.
    11. Mehmet N. Aydin & N. Ziya Perdahci, 0. "Dynamic network analysis of online interactive platform," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-12.
    12. repec:dau:papers:123456789/11779 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Jacob Wood & Gohar Feroz Khan, 2015. "International trade negotiation analysis: network and semantic knowledge infrastructure," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(1), pages 537-556, October.
    14. Marian-Gabriel Hâncean & Matjaž Perc & Lazăr Vlăsceanu, 2014. "Fragmented Romanian Sociology: Growth and Structure of the Collaboration Network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-9, November.
    15. Emerson, Isaac Arnold & Amala, Arumugam, 2017. "Protein contact maps: A binary depiction of protein 3D structures," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 465(C), pages 782-791.
    16. Marian-Gabriel Hâncean & Matjaž Perc & Jürgen Lerner, 2021. "The coauthorship networks of the most productive European researchers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 201-224, January.
    17. Duk Hee Lee & Il Won Seo & Ho Chull Choe & Hee Dae Kim, 2012. "Collaboration network patterns and research performance: the case of Korean public research institutions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(3), pages 925-942, June.
    18. Faedo, Nicolás & García-Violini, Demián & Ringwood, John V., 2021. "Controlling synchronization in a complex network of nonlinear oscillators via feedback linearisation and H∞-control," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    19. Xiao‐Bing Hu & Hang Li & XiaoMei Guo & Pieter H. A. J. M. van Gelder & Peijun Shi, 2019. "Spatial Vulnerability of Network Systems under Spatially Local Hazards," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(1), pages 162-179, January.
    20. Ruiz Vargas, E. & Mitchell, D.G.V. & Greening, S.G. & Wahl, L.M., 2014. "Topology of whole-brain functional MRI networks: Improving the truncated scale-free model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 405(C), pages 151-158.
    21. Dunlap, J. & Schramski, J.R., 2024. "Energy-systems accounting in industrial-natural systems; An energy analysis of a managed forest ecosystem including food web biomass dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 488(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:81:y:2019:i:c:p:714-724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.