IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v71y2014icp530-541.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian analysis of a Gibbs hard-core point pattern model with varying repulsion range

Author

Listed:
  • Rajala, T.
  • Penttinen, A.

Abstract

A Bayesian solution is suggested for the modelling of spatial point patterns with inhomogeneous hard-core radius using Gaussian processes in the regularization. The key observation is that a straightforward use of the finite Gibbs hard-core process likelihood together with a log-Gaussian random field prior does not work without penalisation towards high local packing density. Instead, a nearest neighbour Gibbs process likelihood is used. This approach to hard-core inhomogeneity is an alternative to the transformation inhomogeneous hard-core modelling. The computations are based on recent Markovian approximation results for Gaussian fields. As an application, data on the nest locations of Sand Martin (Riparia riparia) colony11Dataset is attached to the online version. on a vertical sand bank are analysed.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajala, T. & Penttinen, A., 2014. "Bayesian analysis of a Gibbs hard-core point pattern model with varying repulsion range," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 530-541.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:71:y:2014:i:c:p:530-541
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2012.08.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947312003179
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2012.08.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. Mase & J. Møller & D. Stoyan & R. Waagepetersen & G. Döge, 2001. "Packing Densities and Simulated Tempering for Hard Core Gibbs Point Processes," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 53(4), pages 661-680, December.
    2. Zhang, Hao, 2004. "Inconsistent Estimation and Asymptotically Equal Interpolations in Model-Based Geostatistics," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 99, pages 250-261, January.
    3. van Lieshout, M.N.M. & Stoica, R.S., 2006. "Perfect simulation for marked point processes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 679-698, November.
    4. Linda Stougaard Nielsen & Eva B. Vedel Jensen, 2004. "Statistical Inference for Transformation Inhomogeneous Point Processes," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 31(1), pages 131-142, March.
    5. Finn Lindgren & Håvard Rue & Johan Lindström, 2011. "An explicit link between Gaussian fields and Gaussian Markov random fields: the stochastic partial differential equation approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 73(4), pages 423-498, September.
    6. J. Møller & A. N. Pettitt & R. Reeves & K. K. Berthelsen, 2006. "An efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo method for distributions with intractable normalising constants," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 93(2), pages 451-458, June.
    7. Bognar, Matthew A., 2005. "Bayesian inference for spatially inhomogeneous pairwise interacting point processes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 1-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ute Hahn & Eva B. Vedel Jensen, 2016. "Hidden Second-order Stationary Spatial Point Processes," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(2), pages 455-475, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Monterrubio-Gómez, Karla & Roininen, Lassi & Wade, Sara & Damoulas, Theodoros & Girolami, Mark, 2020. "Posterior inference for sparse hierarchical non-stationary models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    2. David L. Miller & Richard Glennie & Andrew E. Seaton, 2020. "Understanding the Stochastic Partial Differential Equation Approach to Smoothing," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(1), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Philip A. White & Durban G. Keeler & Daniel Sheanshang & Summer Rupper, 2022. "Improving piecewise linear snow density models through hierarchical spatial and orthogonal functional smoothing," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5), August.
    4. Jonas Wallin & David Bolin, 2015. "Geostatistical Modelling Using Non-Gaussian Matérn Fields," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(3), pages 872-890, September.
    5. Qian Ren & Sudipto Banerjee, 2013. "Hierarchical Factor Models for Large Spatially Misaligned Data: A Low-Rank Predictive Process Approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(1), pages 19-30, March.
    6. Jin, Ick Hoon & Liang, Faming, 2014. "Use of SAMC for Bayesian analysis of statistical models with intractable normalizing constants," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 402-416.
    7. Paul B. May & Andrew O. Finley & Ralph O. Dubayah, 2024. "A Spatial Mixture Model for Spaceborne Lidar Observations Over Mixed Forest and Non-forest Land Types," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 29(4), pages 671-694, December.
    8. Giovanna Jona Lasinio & Gianluca Mastrantonio & Alessio Pollice, 2013. "Discussing the “big n problem”," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 22(1), pages 97-112, March.
    9. Bevilacqua, Moreno & Caamaño-Carrillo, Christian & Porcu, Emilio, 2022. "Unifying compactly supported and Matérn covariance functions in spatial statistics," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    10. Bolin, David & Lindgren, Finn, 2013. "A comparison between Markov approximations and other methods for large spatial data sets," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 7-21.
    11. Peter J. Diggle & Emanuele Giorgi, 2016. "Model-Based Geostatistics for Prevalence Mapping in Low-Resource Settings," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(515), pages 1096-1120, July.
    12. Christopher J. Geoga & Mihai Anitescu & Michael L. Stein, 2021. "Flexible nonstationary spatiotemporal modeling of high‐frequency monitoring data," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), August.
    13. Ninna Vihrs & Jesper Møller & Alan E. Gelfand, 2022. "Approximate Bayesian inference for a spatial point process model exhibiting regularity and random aggregation," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(1), pages 185-210, March.
    14. K. Shuvo Bakar & Nicholas Biddle & Philip Kokic & Huidong Jin, 2020. "A Bayesian spatial categorical model for prediction to overlapping geographical areas in sample surveys," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(2), pages 535-563, February.
    15. Zhang, Tonglin, 2017. "An example of inconsistent MLE of spatial covariance parameters under increasing domain asymptotics," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 108-113.
    16. Matthias Katzfuss & Joseph Guinness & Wenlong Gong & Daniel Zilber, 2020. "Vecchia Approximations of Gaussian-Process Predictions," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(3), pages 383-414, September.
    17. Girard, Didier A., 2016. "Asymptotic near-efficiency of the “Gibbs-energy and empirical-variance” estimating functions for fitting Matérn models — I: Densely sampled processes," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 191-197.
    18. Finn Lindgren, 2015. "Comments on: Comparing and selecting spatial predictors using local criteria," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 24(1), pages 35-44, March.
    19. Vanhatalo, Jarno & Veneranta, Lari & Hudd, Richard, 2012. "Species distribution modeling with Gaussian processes: A case study with the youngest stages of sea spawning whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus L. s.l.) larvae," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 49-58.
    20. Xiaoyu Xiong & Benjamin D. Youngman & Theodoros Economou, 2021. "Data fusion with Gaussian processes for estimation of environmental hazard events," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:71:y:2014:i:c:p:530-541. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.