IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v61y2013icp7-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison between Markov approximations and other methods for large spatial data sets

Author

Listed:
  • Bolin, David
  • Lindgren, Finn

Abstract

The Matérn covariance function is a popular choice for modeling dependence in spatial environmental data. Standard Matérn covariance models are, however, often computationally infeasible for large data sets. Recent results for Markov approximations of Gaussian Matérn fields based on Hilbert space approximations are extended using wavelet basis functions. Using a simulation-based study, these Markov approximations are compared with two of the most popular methods for computationally efficient model approximations, covariance tapering and the process convolution method. The methods are compared with respect to their computational properties when used for spatial prediction (kriging), and the results show that, for a given computational cost, the Markov methods have a substantial gain in accuracy compared with the other methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Bolin, David & Lindgren, Finn, 2013. "A comparison between Markov approximations and other methods for large spatial data sets," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 7-21.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:61:y:2013:i:c:p:7-21
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2012.11.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947312004021
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2012.11.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gneiting, Tilmann, 2002. "Compactly Supported Correlation Functions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(2), pages 493-508, November.
    2. Zhang, Hao, 2004. "Inconsistent Estimation and Asymptotically Equal Interpolations in Model-Based Geostatistics," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 99, pages 250-261, January.
    3. Sudipto Banerjee & Alan E. Gelfand & Andrew O. Finley & Huiyan Sang, 2008. "Gaussian predictive process models for large spatial data sets," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(4), pages 825-848, September.
    4. Hååvard Rue & Hååkon Tjelmeland, 2002. "Fitting Gaussian Markov Random Fields to Gaussian Fields," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 29(1), pages 31-49, March.
    5. Alexandre Rodrigues & Peter J. Diggle, 2010. "A Class of Convolution‐Based Models for Spatio‐Temporal Processes with Non‐Separable Covariance Structure," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 37(4), pages 553-567, December.
    6. Eidsvik, Jo & Finley, Andrew O. & Banerjee, Sudipto & Rue, Håvard, 2012. "Approximate Bayesian inference for large spatial datasets using predictive process models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 1362-1380.
    7. Finn Lindgren & Håvard Rue & Johan Lindström, 2011. "An explicit link between Gaussian fields and Gaussian Markov random fields: the stochastic partial differential equation approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 73(4), pages 423-498, September.
    8. Song, Hae-Ryoung & Fuentes, Montserrat & Ghosh, Sujit, 2008. "A comparative study of Gaussian geostatistical models and Gaussian Markov random field models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(8), pages 1681-1697, September.
    9. Noel Cressie & Gardar Johannesson, 2008. "Fixed rank kriging for very large spatial data sets," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(1), pages 209-226, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lindgren, Finn & Rue, Håvard, 2015. "Bayesian Spatial Modelling with R-INLA," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 63(i19).
    2. David Bolin, 2014. "Spatial Matérn Fields Driven by Non-Gaussian Noise," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 41(3), pages 557-579, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giovanna Jona Lasinio & Gianluca Mastrantonio & Alessio Pollice, 2013. "Discussing the “big n problem”," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 22(1), pages 97-112, March.
    2. Caamaño-Carrillo, Christian & Bevilacqua, Moreno & López, Cristian & Morales-Oñate, Víctor, 2024. "Nearest neighbors weighted composite likelihood based on pairs for (non-)Gaussian massive spatial data with an application to Tukey-hh random fields estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    3. Morales-Oñate, Víctor & Crudu, Federico & Bevilacqua, Moreno, 2021. "Blockwise Euclidean likelihood for spatio-temporal covariance models," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 176-201.
    4. Jialuo Liu & Tingjin Chu & Jun Zhu & Haonan Wang, 2022. "Large spatial data modeling and analysis: A Krylov subspace approach," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(3), pages 1115-1143, September.
    5. Qian Ren & Sudipto Banerjee, 2013. "Hierarchical Factor Models for Large Spatially Misaligned Data: A Low-Rank Predictive Process Approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(1), pages 19-30, March.
    6. Sandy Burden & Noel Cressie & David G. Steel, 2015. "The SAR Model for Very Large Datasets: A Reduced Rank Approach," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-22, May.
    7. Matthias Katzfuss & Joseph Guinness & Wenlong Gong & Daniel Zilber, 2020. "Vecchia Approximations of Gaussian-Process Predictions," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(3), pages 383-414, September.
    8. Marchetti, Yuliya & Nguyen, Hai & Braverman, Amy & Cressie, Noel, 2018. "Spatial data compression via adaptive dispersion clustering," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 138-153.
    9. Sameh Abdulah & Yuxiao Li & Jian Cao & Hatem Ltaief & David E. Keyes & Marc G. Genton & Ying Sun, 2023. "Large‐scale environmental data science with ExaGeoStatR," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), February.
    10. Si Cheng & Bledar A. Konomi & Georgios Karagiannis & Emily L. Kang, 2024. "Recursive nearest neighbor co‐kriging models for big multi‐fidelity spatial data sets," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(4), June.
    11. Zahra Barzegar & Firoozeh Rivaz, 2020. "A scalable Bayesian nonparametric model for large spatio-temporal data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 153-173, March.
    12. Chen, Yewen & Chang, Xiaohui & Luo, Fangzhi & Huang, Hui, 2023. "Additive dynamic models for correcting numerical model outputs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    13. Zilber, Daniel & Katzfuss, Matthias, 2021. "Vecchia–Laplace approximations of generalized Gaussian processes for big non-Gaussian spatial data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    14. Paciorek, Christopher J. & Lipshitz, Benjamin & Zhuo, Wei & Prabhat, . & Kaufman, Cari G. G. & Thomas, Rollin C., 2015. "Parallelizing Gaussian Process Calculations in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 63(i10).
    15. Edwards, Matthew & Castruccio, Stefano & Hammerling, Dorit, 2020. "Marginally parameterized spatio-temporal models and stepwise maximum likelihood estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    16. Karl Pazdernik & Ranjan Maitra & Douglas Nychka & Stephan Sain, 2018. "Reduced Basis Kriging for Big Spatial Fields," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 80(2), pages 280-300, August.
    17. Bivand, Roger & Krivoruchko, Konstantin, 2018. "Big data sampling and spatial analysis: “which of the two ladles, of fig-wood or gold, is appropriate to the soup and the pot?”," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 87-91.
    18. Angela Ferretti & L. Ippoliti & P. Valentini & R. J. Bhansali, 2023. "Long memory conditional random fields on regular lattices," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(5), August.
    19. Zammit-Mangion, Andrew & Rougier, Jonathan, 2018. "A sparse linear algebra algorithm for fast computation of prediction variances with Gaussian Markov random fields," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 116-130.
    20. Jonathan Bradley & Noel Cressie & Tao Shi, 2015. "Comparing and selecting spatial predictors using local criteria," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 24(1), pages 1-28, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:61:y:2013:i:c:p:7-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.