IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v54y2010i9p2066-2081.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inference for a simple step-stress model with competing risks for failure from the exponential distribution under time constraint

Author

Listed:
  • Han, Donghoon
  • Balakrishnan, N.

Abstract

In reliability analysis, accelerated life-testing allows for gradual increment of stress levels on test units during an experiment. In a special class of accelerated life tests known as step-stress tests, the stress levels increase discretely at pre-fixed time points, and this allows the experimenter to obtain information on the parameters of the lifetime distributions more quickly than under normal operating conditions. Moreover, when a test unit fails, there are often more than one fatal cause for the failure, such as mechanical or electrical. In this article, we consider the simple step-stress model under time constraint when the lifetime distributions of the different risk factors are independently exponentially distributed. Under this setup, we derive the maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) of the unknown mean parameters of the different causes under the assumption of a cumulative exposure model. Since it is found that the MLEs do not exist when there is no failure by any particular risk factor within the specified time frame, the exact sampling distributions of the MLEs are derived through the use of conditional moment generating functions. Using these exact distributions as well as the asymptotic distributions, the parametric bootstrap method, and the Bayesian posterior distribution, we discuss the construction of confidence intervals and credible intervals for the parameters. Their performance is assessed through Monte Carlo simulations and finally, we illustrate the methods of inference discussed here with an example.

Suggested Citation

  • Han, Donghoon & Balakrishnan, N., 2010. "Inference for a simple step-stress model with competing risks for failure from the exponential distribution under time constraint," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(9), pages 2066-2081, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:54:y:2010:i:9:p:2066-2081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(10)00117-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N. Balakrishnan & Qihao Xie & D. Kundu, 2009. "Exact inference for a simple step-stress model from the exponential distribution under time constraint," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 61(1), pages 251-274, March.
    2. A. Childs & B. Chandrasekar & N. Balakrishnan & D. Kundu, 2003. "Exact likelihood inference based on Type-I and Type-II hybrid censored samples from the exponential distribution," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 55(2), pages 319-330, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Han, David & Bai, Tianyu, 2020. "Design optimization of a simple step-stress accelerated life test – Contrast between continuous and interval inspections with non-uniform step durations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    2. Sun, Yanqing & Li, Mei & Gilbert, Peter B., 2016. "Goodness-of-fit test of the stratified mark-specific proportional hazards model with continuous mark," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 348-358.
    3. Herbert Hove & Frank Beichelt & Parmod K. Kapur, 2017. "Estimation of the Frank copula model for dependent competing risks in accelerated life testing," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(4), pages 673-682, December.
    4. Julian Górny & Erhard Cramer, 2020. "On Exact Inferential Results for a Simple Step-Stress Model Under a Time Constraint," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 82(2), pages 201-239, November.
    5. David Han & H.K.T. Ng, 2013. "Comparison between constant‐stress and step‐stress accelerated life tests under Time Constraint," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(7), pages 541-556, October.
    6. David Han & Debasis Kundu, 2013. "Inference for a step-stress model with competing risks from the GE distribution under Type-I censoring," Working Papers 0181mss, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    7. Yuan Ma & Wenhao Gui, 2021. "Competing Risks Step-Stress Model with Lagged Effect under Gompertz Distribution," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(24), pages 1-26, December.
    8. Han, David, 2015. "Time and cost constrained optimal designs of constant-stress and step-stress accelerated life tests," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 1-14.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Balakrishnan, N. & Kundu, Debasis, 2013. "Hybrid censoring: Models, inferential results and applications," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 166-209.
    2. Arnab Koley & Debasis Kundu, 2017. "On generalized progressive hybrid censoring in presence of competing risks," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 80(4), pages 401-426, May.
    3. N. Balakrishnan & G. Iliopoulos, 2010. "Stochastic monotonicity of the MLEs of parameters in exponential simple step-stress models under Type-I and Type-II censoring," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 89-109, July.
    4. Julian Górny & Erhard Cramer, 2019. "From B-spline representations to gamma representations in hybrid censoring," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1119-1135, August.
    5. Julian Górny & Erhard Cramer, 2020. "On Exact Inferential Results for a Simple Step-Stress Model Under a Time Constraint," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 82(2), pages 201-239, November.
    6. Park, Sangun & Balakrishnan, N. & Zheng, Gang, 2008. "Fisher information in hybrid censored data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(16), pages 2781-2786, November.
    7. Deepak Prajapati & Sharmistha Mitra & Debasis Kundu, 2019. "A New Decision Theoretic Sampling Plan for Type-I and Type-I Hybrid Censored Samples from the Exponential Distribution," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 81(2), pages 251-288, December.
    8. Suparna Basu & Sanjay K. Singh & Umesh Singh, 2019. "Estimation of Inverse Lindley Distribution Using Product of Spacings Function for Hybrid Censored Data," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 1377-1394, December.
    9. Jimut Bahan Chakrabarty & Shovan Chowdhury & Soumya Roy, 2019. "Optimum life test plan for products sold under warranty having Type-I generalizedhybrid censored Weibull distributed lifetimes," Working papers 302, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    10. B. Chandrasekar & A. Childs & N. Balakrishnan, 2004. "Exact likelihood inference for the exponential distribution under generalized Type‐I and Type‐II hybrid censoring," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(7), pages 994-1004, October.
    11. Balakrishnan, N. & Rasouli, Abbas, 2008. "Exact likelihood inference for two exponential populations under joint Type-II censoring," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 2725-2738, January.
    12. Feizjavadian, S.H. & Hashemi, R., 2015. "Analysis of dependent competing risks in the presence of progressive hybrid censoring using Marshall–Olkin bivariate Weibull distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 19-34.
    13. Julian Górny & Erhard Cramer, 2018. "Modularization of hybrid censoring schemes and its application to unified progressive hybrid censoring," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 173-210, February.
    14. Ruhul Ali Khan & Murari Mitra, 2021. "Estimation issues in the Exponential–Logarithmic model under hybrid censoring," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 419-450, February.
    15. Jorge Navarro, 2016. "Stochastic comparisons of generalized mixtures and coherent systems," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(1), pages 150-169, March.
    16. Ping Chan & Hon Ng & Feng Su, 2015. "Exact likelihood inference for the two-parameter exponential distribution under Type-II progressively hybrid censoring," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 78(6), pages 747-770, August.
    17. Prakash Chandra & Yogesh Mani Tripathi & Liang Wang & Chandrakant Lodhi, 2023. "Estimation for Kies distribution with generalized progressive hybrid censoring under partially observed competing risks model," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 237(6), pages 1048-1072, December.
    18. Kundu, Debasis & Joarder, Avijit, 2006. "Analysis of Type-II progressively hybrid censored data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(10), pages 2509-2528, June.
    19. Debashis Samanta & Debasis Kundu & Ayon Ganguly, 2018. "Order Restricted Bayesian Analysis of a Simple Step Stress Model," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 80(2), pages 195-221, November.
    20. Abhimanyu Singh Yadav & Emrah Altun & Haitham M. Yousof, 2021. "Burr–Hatke Exponential Distribution: A Decreasing Failure Rate Model, Statistical Inference and Applications," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 241-260, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:54:y:2010:i:9:p:2066-2081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.