IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v185y2024ics0960077924006076.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of both-density-dependent fear effect in a Leslie–Gower predator–prey model with Beddington–DeAngelis functional response

Author

Listed:
  • Xue, Yalong

Abstract

Animals have evolved fearful behavior throughout a lengthy evolutionary history, and such action should be the result of interactions between prey and predator. At present, the fear factor considered by many scholars in predator–prey models is reasonable to a certain extent, for example in some unicellular and bacterial species, but for most species, the fear factor should be density-dependent of both species due to sexual reproduction. Therefore, based on the existing works, this paper puts forward some more reasonable conditions that should be satisfied by fear factor, and makes theoretical analysis and numerical simulations for specific type of expression. The study shows that fear plays an important role in enriching model dynamics, and that the model dynamics are sensitive to moderate levels of fear. Lower levels of fear maintain the same dynamics as the model without fear, higher levels of fear can exclude periodic solutions (or limit cycles) to promote model stability, while moderate levels of fear may lead to the emergence of Hopf bifurcations. By selecting a different set of parameters, the Hopf bifurcation in our model can be both supercritical and subcritical, contrasting to the typical predator–prey model in which it frequently appears supercritical.

Suggested Citation

  • Xue, Yalong, 2024. "Impact of both-density-dependent fear effect in a Leslie–Gower predator–prey model with Beddington–DeAngelis functional response," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:185:y:2024:i:c:s0960077924006076
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077924006076
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115055?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:185:y:2024:i:c:s0960077924006076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.