IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v87y2010i8p2647-2651.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gas-liquid absorption reaction between (NH4)2SO3 solution and SO2 for ammonia-based wet flue gas desulfurization

Author

Listed:
  • Gao, Xiang
  • Ding, Honglei
  • Du, Zhen
  • Wu, Zuliang
  • Fang, Mengxiang
  • Luo, Zhongyang
  • Cen, Kefa

Abstract

In order to investigate the characteristics of the reaction between ammonium sulfite, the main desulfurizing solution, and the flue-gas-contained sulfur dioxide during the process of ammonia-based WFGD (wet flue gas desulfurization) in a power plant, the gas-liquid absorption reaction between sulfur dioxide and an ammonium sulfite solution was studied in a stirred tank reactor. The experimental results indicate that the absorption of sulfur dioxide is controlled by both the gas- and liquid-films when the ammonium sulfite concentration is lower than 0.05Â mol/L, and mainly by the gas-film at higher concentrations. In the latter case, the reaction rates are found to be zero-order with respect to the concentration of ammonium sulfite. The absorption rates of sulfur dioxide increase as the concentration of sulfur dioxide in inlet gas and the temperature increase. The reaction rate is of 0.6th-order with respect to the concentration of sulfur dioxide.

Suggested Citation

  • Gao, Xiang & Ding, Honglei & Du, Zhen & Wu, Zuliang & Fang, Mengxiang & Luo, Zhongyang & Cen, Kefa, 2010. "Gas-liquid absorption reaction between (NH4)2SO3 solution and SO2 for ammonia-based wet flue gas desulfurization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(8), pages 2647-2651, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:87:y:2010:i:8:p:2647-2651
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306-2619(10)00087-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Jinsheng & Anthony, Edward J., 2008. "Clean combustion of solid fuels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(2-3), pages 73-79, February.
    2. Pikoñ, Krzysztof, 2003. "Environmental impact of combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(3-4), pages 213-220, July.
    3. Kaminski, Jacek, 2003. "Technologies and costs of SO2-emissions reduction for the energy sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(3-4), pages 165-172, July.
    4. Chung, Whan-Sam & Tohno, Susumu & Shim, Sang Yul, 2009. "An estimation of energy and GHG emission intensity caused by energy consumption in Korea: An energy IO approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(10), pages 1902-1914, October.
    5. Islas, Jorge & Grande, Genice, 2008. "Abatement costs of SO2-control options in the Mexican electric-power sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(2-3), pages 80-94, February.
    6. Roy, Sounak & Hegde, M.S. & Madras, Giridhar, 2009. "Catalysis for NOx abatement," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(11), pages 2283-2297, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ling Li & Buting Zhang & Ping Zhu & Liangying Yu & Guangjin Zhao & Min Li & Hecen Wang, 2022. "Structure Optimization Research Based on Numerical Simulation of Flow Field in Ammonia-Based Wet Sintering Flue Gas Desulfurization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Si, Tong & Wang, Chunbo & Yan, Xuenan & Zhang, Yue & Ren, Yujie & Hu, Jian & Anthony, Edward J., 2019. "Simultaneous removal of SO2 and NOx by a new combined spray-and-scattered-bubble technology based on preozonation: From lab scale to pilot scale," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1528-1538.
    3. Jiang, Kaiqi & Yu, Hai & Chen, Linghong & Fang, Mengxiang & Azzi, Merched & Cottrell, Aaron & Li, Kangkang, 2020. "An advanced, ammonia-based combined NOx/SOx/CO2 emission control process towards a low-cost, clean coal technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    4. Li, Kangkang & Yu, Hai & Qi, Guojie & Feron, Paul & Tade, Moses & Yu, Jingwen & Wang, Shujuan, 2015. "Rate-based modelling of combined SO2 removal and NH3 recycling integrated with an aqueous NH3-based CO2 capture process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 66-77.
    5. Zhang, Xiangyu & Zhang, Bo & Lu, Xu & Gao, Ning & Xiang, Xiaofeng & Xu, Hongjie, 2017. "Experimental study on urea hydrolysis to ammonia for gas denitration in a continuous tank reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 677-688.
    6. Zhao, Haitao & Mu, Xueliang & Yang, Gang & George, Mike & Cao, Pengfei & Fanady, Billy & Rong, Siyu & Gao, Xiang & Wu, Tao, 2017. "Graphene-like MoS2 containing adsorbents for Hg0 capture at coal-fired power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 254-264.
    7. Chen, Long & Xu, Guiyin & Rui, Zhenhua & Alshawabkeh, Akram N., 2019. "Demonstration of a feasible energy-water-environment nexus: Waste sulfur dioxide for water treatment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 1011-1022.
    8. Yu, Hesheng & Zhu, Qunyi & Tan, Zhongchao, 2012. "Absorption of nitric oxide from simulated flue gas using different absorbents at room temperature and atmospheric pressure," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 53-58.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Kangkang & Yu, Hai & Qi, Guojie & Feron, Paul & Tade, Moses & Yu, Jingwen & Wang, Shujuan, 2015. "Rate-based modelling of combined SO2 removal and NH3 recycling integrated with an aqueous NH3-based CO2 capture process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 66-77.
    2. Sugathan, Anish & Bhangale, Ritesh & Kansal, Vishal & Hulke, Unmil, 2018. "How can Indian power plants cost-effectively meet the new sulfur emission standards? Policy evaluation using marginal abatement cost-curves," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 124-137.
    3. Jiang, Kaiqi & Yu, Hai & Chen, Linghong & Fang, Mengxiang & Azzi, Merched & Cottrell, Aaron & Li, Kangkang, 2020. "An advanced, ammonia-based combined NOx/SOx/CO2 emission control process towards a low-cost, clean coal technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    4. Nazari, S. & Shahhoseini, O. & Sohrabi-Kashani, A. & Davari, S. & Sahabi, H. & Rezaeian, A., 2012. "SO2 pollution of heavy oil-fired steam power plants in Iran," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 456-465.
    5. Niu, Shengli & Han, Kuihua & Lu, Chunmei & Sun, Rongyue, 2010. "Thermogravimetric analysis of the relationship among calcium magnesium acetate, calcium acetate and magnesium acetate," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(7), pages 2237-2242, July.
    6. Zhao, Haitao & Mu, Xueliang & Yang, Gang & George, Mike & Cao, Pengfei & Fanady, Billy & Rong, Siyu & Gao, Xiang & Wu, Tao, 2017. "Graphene-like MoS2 containing adsorbents for Hg0 capture at coal-fired power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 254-264.
    7. Lixiao Zhang & Qiuhong Hu & Fan Zhang, 2014. "Input-Output Modeling for Urban Energy Consumption in Beijing: Dynamics and Comparison," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-11, March.
    8. Jiang, Meihui & An, Haizhong & Guan, Qing & Sun, Xiaoqi, 2018. "Global embodied mineral flow between industrial sectors: A network perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 192-201.
    9. Li, Shiyuan & Xu, Mingxin & Jia, Lufei & Tan, Li & Lu, Qinggang, 2016. "Influence of operating parameters on N2O emission in O2/CO2 combustion with high oxygen concentration in circulating fluidized bed," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 197-209.
    10. Imtiaz, Qasim & Broda, Marcin & Müller, Christoph R., 2014. "Structure–property relationship of co-precipitated Cu-rich, Al2O3- or MgAl2O4-stabilized oxygen carriers for chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 557-565.
    11. Kasikowski, Tomasz & Buczkowski, Roman & Cichosz, Marcin & Lemanowska, Eliza, 2007. "Combined distiller waste utilisation and combustion gases desulphurisation method," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 665-690.
    12. Jindal, Abhinav & Nilakantan, Rahul, 2021. "Falling efficiency levels of Indian coal-fired power plants: A slacks-based analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    13. Zhang, Yongxing & Doroodchi, Elham & Moghtaderi, Behdad, 2014. "Chemical looping combustion of ultra low concentration of methane with Fe2O3/Al2O3 and CuO/SiO2," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1916-1923.
    14. Ahmad O. Hasan & Khamis Essa & Mohamed R. Gomaa, 2022. "Synthesis, Structure Characterization and Study of a New Kind of Catalyst: A Monolith of Nickel Made by Additive Manufacturing Coated with Platinum," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-13, October.
    15. Wang, Qunwei & Zhou, Peng & Zhou, Dequn, 2012. "Efficiency measurement with carbon dioxide emissions: The case of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 161-166.
    16. Aisyah, L. & Ashman, P.J. & Kwong, C.W., 2013. "Performance of coal fly-ash based oxygen carrier for the chemical looping combustion of synthesis gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 44-50.
    17. Heidel, Barna & Hilber, Melanie & Scheffknecht, Günter, 2014. "Impact of additives for enhanced sulfur dioxide removal on re-emissions of mercury in wet flue gas desulfurization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 485-491.
    18. Zhang, Shuai & Xiao, Rui & Zheng, Wenguang, 2014. "Comparative study between fluidized-bed and fixed-bed operation modes in pressurized chemical looping combustion of coal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 181-189.
    19. Meng, William X. & Banerjee, Subhodeep & Zhang, Xiao & Agarwal, Ramesh K., 2015. "Process simulation of multi-stage chemical-looping combustion using Aspen Plus," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1869-1877.
    20. Prasad, Ravita D. & Bansal, R.C. & Raturi, Atul, 2014. "Multi-faceted energy planning: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 686-699.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:87:y:2010:i:8:p:2647-2651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.