IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v114y2014icp485-491.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of additives for enhanced sulfur dioxide removal on re-emissions of mercury in wet flue gas desulfurization

Author

Listed:
  • Heidel, Barna
  • Hilber, Melanie
  • Scheffknecht, Günter

Abstract

The wet flue gas desulfurization process (FGD) in fossil fired power plants offers the advantage of simultaneously removing SO2 and other water soluble pollutants, such as certain oxidized mercury compounds (Hg2+). In order to maximize SO2 removal efficiency of installed FGD units, organic additives can be utilized. In the context of multi-pollutant control by wet FGD, the effect of formic and adipic acid on redox reactions of dissolved mercury compounds is investigated with a continuously operated lab-scale test-rig. For sulfite (SO32-) concentrations above a certain critical value, their potential as reducing agent leads to rapidly increasing formation and re-emission of elemental mercury (Hg0). Increasing chloride concentration and decreasing pH and slurry temperature have been identified as key factors for depressing Hg0 re-emissions. Both organic additives have a negative impact on Hg-retention and cause increased Hg0 re-emissions in the wet FGD process, with formic acid being the significantly stronger reducing agent. Different pathways of Hg2+ reduction were identified by qualitative interpretation of the pH-dependence and by comparison of activation enthalpies and activation entropies. While the first mechanism proposed identifies SO32- as reducing agent and is therefore relevant for any FGD process, the second mechanism involves the formate anion, thus being exclusively relevant for FGDs utilizing formic acid as additive.

Suggested Citation

  • Heidel, Barna & Hilber, Melanie & Scheffknecht, Günter, 2014. "Impact of additives for enhanced sulfur dioxide removal on re-emissions of mercury in wet flue gas desulfurization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 485-491.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:114:y:2014:i:c:p:485-491
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.09.059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261913008064
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.09.059?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Islas, Jorge & Grande, Genice, 2008. "Abatement costs of SO2-control options in the Mexican electric-power sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(2-3), pages 80-94, February.
    2. Sun, Zhongwei & Wang, Shengwei & Zhou, Qulan & Hui, Shi'en, 2010. "Experimental study on desulfurization efficiency and gas-liquid mass transfer in a new liquid-screen desulfurization system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(5), pages 1505-1512, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Łuszkiewicz, Dariusz & Jędrusik, Maria & Świerczok, Arkadiusz & Kobylańska-Pawlisz, Mariola, 2023. "Effect of addition of sulphide based additive to WFGD slurry on mercury removal from flue gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    2. Zhao, Haitao & Mu, Xueliang & Yang, Gang & George, Mike & Cao, Pengfei & Fanady, Billy & Rong, Siyu & Gao, Xiang & Wu, Tao, 2017. "Graphene-like MoS2 containing adsorbents for Hg0 capture at coal-fired power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 254-264.
    3. Chen, Long & Xu, Guiyin & Rui, Zhenhua & Alshawabkeh, Akram N., 2019. "Demonstration of a feasible energy-water-environment nexus: Waste sulfur dioxide for water treatment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 1011-1022.
    4. Heidel, Barna & Rogge, Tobias & Scheffknecht, Günter, 2016. "Controlled desorption of mercury in wet FGD waste water treatment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1211-1217.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gu, Hui & Cui, Yanfeng & Zhu, Hongxia & Xue, Rui & Si, Fengqi, 2018. "A new approach for clustering in desulfurization system based on modified framework for gypsum slurry quality monitoring," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 789-801.
    2. Prasad, Ravita D. & Bansal, R.C. & Raturi, Atul, 2014. "Multi-faceted energy planning: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 686-699.
    3. Gao, Xiang & Ding, Honglei & Du, Zhen & Wu, Zuliang & Fang, Mengxiang & Luo, Zhongyang & Cen, Kefa, 2010. "Gas-liquid absorption reaction between (NH4)2SO3 solution and SO2 for ammonia-based wet flue gas desulfurization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(8), pages 2647-2651, August.
    4. Bowen Xiao & Dongxiao Niu & Han Wu & Haichao Wang, 2017. "Marginal Abatement Cost of CO 2 in China Based on Directional Distance Function: An Industry Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Sugathan, Anish & Bhangale, Ritesh & Kansal, Vishal & Hulke, Unmil, 2018. "How can Indian power plants cost-effectively meet the new sulfur emission standards? Policy evaluation using marginal abatement cost-curves," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 124-137.
    6. Jiang, Kaiqi & Yu, Hai & Chen, Linghong & Fang, Mengxiang & Azzi, Merched & Cottrell, Aaron & Li, Kangkang, 2020. "An advanced, ammonia-based combined NOx/SOx/CO2 emission control process towards a low-cost, clean coal technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    7. Chih Chen, 2015. "Assessing the Pollutant Abatement Cost of Greenhouse Gas Emission Regulation: A Case Study of Taiwan’s Freeway Bus Service Industry," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 61(4), pages 477-495, August.
    8. Nazari, S. & Shahhoseini, O. & Sohrabi-Kashani, A. & Davari, S. & Sahabi, H. & Rezaeian, A., 2012. "SO2 pollution of heavy oil-fired steam power plants in Iran," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 456-465.
    9. Halkos, George & Tzeremes, Panagiotis, 2015. "Scenario analysis on greenhouse gas emissions reduction in Southeast Balkans' energy system," MPRA Paper 65280, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Li, Kangkang & Yu, Hai & Qi, Guojie & Feron, Paul & Tade, Moses & Yu, Jingwen & Wang, Shujuan, 2015. "Rate-based modelling of combined SO2 removal and NH3 recycling integrated with an aqueous NH3-based CO2 capture process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 66-77.
    11. Li, Yan & Wei, Yigang & Zhang, Xiaoling & Tao, Yuan, 2020. "Regional and provincial CO2 emission reduction task decomposition of China's 2030 carbon emission peak based on the efficiency, equity and synthesizing principles," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 237-256.
    12. Liu, Liwei & Sun, Xiaoru & Chen, Chuxiang & Zhao, Erdong, 2016. "How will auctioning impact on the carbon emission abatement cost of electric power generation sector in China?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 594-609.
    13. Niu, Shengli & Han, Kuihua & Lu, Chunmei & Sun, Rongyue, 2010. "Thermogravimetric analysis of the relationship among calcium magnesium acetate, calcium acetate and magnesium acetate," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(7), pages 2237-2242, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:114:y:2014:i:c:p:485-491. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.