IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v249y2019icp1-13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A conceptual framework and techno-economic analysis of a pelletization-gasification based bioenergy system

Author

Listed:
  • Pradhan, Priyabrata
  • Gadkari, Prabodh
  • Mahajani, Sanjay M.
  • Arora, Amit

Abstract

This paper presents a holistic approach to promote bioenergy in India by designing a conceptual framework that combines resource, technology and market. The proposed concept is an attempt to integrate pelletization and gasification technology for bioenergy system development through an end-to-end approach. The potential of bioenergy resource (i.e. agro waste) was estimated based on survey. The study further assessed the economic feasibility of agro waste pelletization. The economic evaluation was made using indicators such as net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), discounted payback period (DPBP) etc. Pellet plant capacity of 0.5 ton h−1 showed acceptable economics and the NPV, IRR and DPBP were ₹9.35 million ($0.13 million), 41% and 2.8 years, respectively. Moreover, the larger capacity plants (>2 ton h−1) were subjected to more risk under low pellet prices (< ₹5 kg−1 or $71.4 ton−1). The cash flow statement showed a strong debt paying ability for the project. Pellet price was the most sensitive factor followed by annual operating days on pellet plant economics. Monte Carlo simulation predicted an average NPV of ₹9.3 ± 2.0 million ($133.2 ± 29.1 thousand). The economics of fuel pellets utilization in a gasifier for energy applications was also evaluated. The pellet fed gasifier system appeared to be cost competitive with commercial liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and wood at a pellet price range of ₹6.3–8.8 kg−1 ($90–126 ton−1) in a select scenario. Overall, the designed framework appears to reduce over-dependency on wood or fossil sources, and facilitate bioenergy promotion in rural areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Pradhan, Priyabrata & Gadkari, Prabodh & Mahajani, Sanjay M. & Arora, Amit, 2019. "A conceptual framework and techno-economic analysis of a pelletization-gasification based bioenergy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 1-13.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:249:y:2019:i:c:p:1-13
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919307676
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.129?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pacudan, Romeo, 2016. "Implications of applying solar industry best practice resource estimation on project financing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 489-497.
    2. Jiang, Dong & Zhuang, Dafang & Fu, Jinying & Huang, Yaohuan & Wen, Kege, 2012. "Bioenergy potential from crop residues in China: Availability and distribution," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 1377-1382.
    3. Wang, Xiaoyu & Yang, Lu & Steinberger, Yosef & Liu, Zuxin & Liao, Shuhua & Xie, Guanghui, 2013. "Field crop residue estimate and availability for biofuel production in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 864-875.
    4. Salman, Chaudhary Awais & Naqvi, Muhammad & Thorin, Eva & Yan, Jinyue, 2018. "Gasification process integration with existing combined heat and power plants for polygeneration of dimethyl ether or methanol: A detailed profitability analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 116-128.
    5. Jha, Shibani K. & Puppala, Harish, 2017. "Prospects of renewable energy sources in India: Prioritization of alternative sources in terms of Energy Index," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 116-127.
    6. Sahoo, Kamalakanta & Bilek, Edward & Bergman, Richard & Mani, Sudhagar, 2019. "Techno-economic analysis of producing solid biofuels and biochar from forest residues using portable systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 578-590.
    7. Hiloidhari, Moonmoon & Das, Dhiman & Baruah, D.C., 2014. "Bioenergy potential from crop residue biomass in India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 504-512.
    8. Christoforou, Elias & Kylili, Angeliki & Fokaides, Paris A., 2016. "Technical and economical evaluation of olive mills solid waste pellets," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA), pages 33-41.
    9. Prasad, Lalta & Subbarao, P.M.V. & Subrahmanyam, J.P., 2015. "Experimental investigation on gasification characteristic of high lignin biomass (Pongamia shells)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 415-423.
    10. Ghosh, Debyani & D Sagar, Ambuj & Kishore, V.V.N., 2006. "Scaling up biomass gasifier use: an application-specific approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(13), pages 1566-1582, September.
    11. Golecha, Rajdeep & Gan, Jianbang, 2016. "Biomass transport cost from field to conversion facility when biomass yield density and road network vary with transport radius," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 321-331.
    12. Ciolkosz, Daniel & Jacobson, Michael & Heil, Nichole & Brandau, Will, 2017. "An assessment of farm scale biomass pelleting in the Northeast," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 85-91.
    13. Di Giacomo, G. & Taglieri, L., 2009. "Renewable energy benefits with conversion of woody residues to pellets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 724-731.
    14. Gan, Lin & Yu, Juan, 2008. "Bioenergy transition in rural China: Policy options and co-benefits," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 531-540, February.
    15. Lohan, Shiv Kumar & Jat, H.S. & Yadav, Arvind Kumar & Sidhu, H.S. & Jat, M.L. & Choudhary, Madhu & Peter, Jyotsna Kiran & Sharma, P.C., 2018. "Burning issues of paddy residue management in north-west states of India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 693-706.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Congyu & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Ho, Shih-Hsin & Park, Young-Kwon & Wang, Chengyu & Zhang, Ying, 2023. "Pelletization property analysis of raw and torrefied corn stalks for industrial application to achieve agricultural waste conversion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    2. Sunday Yusuf Kpalo & Mohamad Faiz Zainuddin & Latifah Abd Manaf & Ahmad Muhaimin Roslan & Nik Nor Rahimah Nik Ab Rahim, 2022. "Techno-Economic Viability Assessment of a Household Scale Agricultural Residue Composite Briquette Project for Rural Communities in Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Adalberto Ospino-Castro & Carlos Robles-Algar n & Juan Tob n-Perez & Rafael Pe a-Gallardo & Melisa Acosta-coll, 2020. "Financing of Residential Rooftop Photovoltaic Projects Under a Net Metering Policy Framework: The Case of the Colombian Caribbean Region," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(6), pages 337-346.
    4. Lenka Štofová & Petra Szaryszová & Bohuslava Mihalčová, 2021. "Testing the Bioeconomic Options of Transitioning to Solid Recovered Fuel: A Case Study of a Thermal Power Plant in Slovakia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. V. Venkatramanan & Shachi Shah & Shiv Prasad & Anoop Singh & Ram Prasad, 2021. "Assessment of Bioenergy Generation Potential of Agricultural Crop Residues in India," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(4), pages 1335-1348, December.
    2. Mohsen Jamali & Esmaeil Bakhshandeh & Mohammad Yaghoubi Khanghahi & Carmine Crecchio, 2021. "Metadata Analysis to Evaluate Environmental Impacts of Wheat Residues Burning on Soil Quality in Developing and Developed Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Lohan, Shiv Kumar & Jat, H.S. & Yadav, Arvind Kumar & Sidhu, H.S. & Jat, M.L. & Choudhary, Madhu & Peter, Jyotsna Kiran & Sharma, P.C., 2018. "Burning issues of paddy residue management in north-west states of India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 693-706.
    4. Ji, Li-Qun, 2015. "An assessment of agricultural residue resources for liquid biofuel production in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 561-575.
    5. Ru Fang, Yan & Zhang, Silu & Zhou, Ziqiao & Shi, Wenjun & Hui Xie, Guang, 2022. "Sustainable development in China: Valuation of bioenergy potential and CO2 reduction from crop straw," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    6. Gaurav Kumar Porichha & Yulin Hu & Kasanneni Tirumala Venkateswara Rao & Chunbao Charles Xu, 2021. "Crop Residue Management in India: Stubble Burning vs. Other Utilizations including Bioenergy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    7. Zhang, Bingquan & Xu, Jialu & Lin, Zhixian & Lin, Tao & Faaij, André P.C., 2021. "Spatially explicit analyses of sustainable agricultural residue potential for bioenergy in China under various soil and land management scenarios," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    8. Holmatov, B. & Schyns, J.F. & Krol, M.S. & Gerbens-Leenes, P.W. & Hoekstra, A.Y., 2021. "Can crop residues provide fuel for future transport? Limited global residue bioethanol potentials and large associated land, water and carbon footprints," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    9. Wen, Wen & Zhang, Qin, 2015. "A design of straw acquisition mode for China's straw power plant based on supply chain coordination," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 369-374.
    10. Famoso, F. & Prestipino, M. & Brusca, S. & Galvagno, A., 2020. "Designing sustainable bioenergy from residual biomass: Site allocation criteria and energy/exergy performance indicators," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    11. Singh, Jaswinder, 2016. "Identifying an economic power production system based on agricultural straw on regional basis in India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1140-1155.
    12. Feng, Cheng & Yu, Xinxin & Tan, Hanqiu & Liu, Tian & Hu, Tianyu & Zhang, Zhuoyan & Qiu, Shi & Chen, Longjian, 2013. "The economic feasibility of a crop-residue densification plant: A case study for the city of Jinzhou in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 172-180.
    13. Jat, H.S. & Jat, R.D. & Nanwal, R.K. & Lohan, Shiv Kumar & Yadav, A.K. & Poonia, Tanuja & Sharma, P.C. & Jat, M.L., 2020. "Energy use efficiency of crop residue management for sustainable energy and agriculture conservation in NW India," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1372-1382.
    14. Anand, Abhijeet & Kumar, Vivek & Kaushal, Priyanka, 2022. "Biochar and its twin benefits: Crop residue management and climate change mitigation in India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    15. Wu, Bo & Wang, Yan-Wei & Dai, Yong-Hua & Song, Chao & Zhu, Qi-Li & Qin, Han & Tan, Fu-Rong & Chen, Han-Cheng & Dai, Li-Chun & Hu, Guo-Quan & He, Ming-Xiong, 2021. "Current status and future prospective of bio-ethanol industry in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    16. Fang, Yan Ru & Wu, Yi & Xie, Guang Hui, 2019. "Crop residue utilizations and potential for bioethanol production in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    17. Bundhoo, Zumar M.A. & Mauthoor, Sumayya & Mohee, Romeela, 2016. "Potential of biogas production from biomass and waste materials in the Small Island Developing State of Mauritius," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1087-1100.
    18. Lingling Wang & Tsunemi Watanabe, 2016. "A Stackelberg Game Theoretic Analysis of Incentive Effects under Perceived Risk for China’s Straw-Based Power Plant Supply Chain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-20, June.
    19. Christoforou, Elias & Kylili, Angeliki & Fokaides, Paris A., 2016. "Technical and economical evaluation of olive mills solid waste pellets," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA), pages 33-41.
    20. Anna Härri & Jarkko Levänen & Katariina Koistinen, 2020. "Marginalized Small-Scale Farmers as Actors in Just Circular-Economy Transitions: Exploring Opportunities to Circulate Crop Residue as Raw Material in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-18, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:249:y:2019:i:c:p:1-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.