IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v199y2017icp359-369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation the potential and energy efficiency of dual stage pressure retarded osmosis process

Author

Listed:
  • Altaee, Ali
  • Zaragoza, Guillermo
  • Drioli, Enrico
  • Zhou, John

Abstract

Power generation by means of Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO) has been proposed for harvesting the energy of a salinity gradient. Energy recovery by the PRO process decreases along the membrane module due to depleting of the chemical potential across the membrane and concentration polarization effects. A dual stage PRO (DSPRO) design can be used to rejuvenate the chemical potential difference and reduce the concentration polarization on feed solution. Several design configurations were suggested for the membrane module arrangements in the first and second stage of the PRO process. PRO performance was evaluated for a number of salinity gradients proposed by coupling Dead Sea water or Reverse Osmosis (RO) brine with seawater or wastewater effluent. Maximum specific energy of inlet and outlet feeds was calculated using a developed computer model to identify the amount of recovered and remaining energy. Initially, specific power generation by the PRO process increased by increasing the number of modules of the first stage. Maximum specific energy is calculated along the PRO module to understand the degradation of the maximum specific energy in each module before introducing a second stage PRO process. Adding a second stage PRO process resulted in a sharp increase of the chemical potential difference and the specific energy yield of the process. Between 10% and 13% increase of the specific power generation was achieved by the DSPRO process for the Dead Sea-seawater salinity gradient depending on the dual stage design configuration. For Dead Sea-RO brine, 12–16% increase of the specific power generation was achieved by the dual stage PRO process. For Dead Sea-wastewater and RO brine-wastewater, a neutral and sometimes negative impact occurred when a second stage PRO process was introduced. We concluded that, for a given draw solution concentration, dual stage performs better than the conventional PRO process at high feed salinities, yet requires lower hydraulic pressure.

Suggested Citation

  • Altaee, Ali & Zaragoza, Guillermo & Drioli, Enrico & Zhou, John, 2017. "Evaluation the potential and energy efficiency of dual stage pressure retarded osmosis process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 359-369.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:199:y:2017:i:c:p:359-369
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261917305421
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maisonneuve, Jonathan & Laflamme, Claude B. & Pillay, Pragasen, 2016. "Experimental investigation of pressure retarded osmosis for renewable energy conversion: Towards increased net power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 425-435.
    2. Altaee, Ali & Millar, Graeme J. & Zaragoza, Guillermo, 2016. "Integration and optimization of pressure retarded osmosis with reverse osmosis for power generation and high efficiency desalination," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 110-118.
    3. Altaee, Ali & Palenzuela, Patricia & Zaragoza, Guillermo & AlAnezi, Adnan Alhathal, 2017. "Single and dual stage closed-loop pressure retarded osmosis for power generation: Feasibility and performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 328-345.
    4. He, Wei & Wang, Jihong, 2017. "Feasibility study of energy storage by concentrating/desalinating water: Concentrated Water Energy Storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 872-884.
    5. Farrell, Eanna & Hassan, Mohamed I. & Tufa, Ramato A. & Tuomiranta, Arttu & Avci, Ahmet H. & Politano, Antonio & Curcio, Efrem & Arafat, Hassan A., 2017. "Reverse electrodialysis powered greenhouse concept for water- and energy-self-sufficient agriculture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 390-409.
    6. Han, Gang & Ge, Qingchun & Chung, Tai-Shung, 2014. "Conceptual demonstration of novel closed-loop pressure retarded osmosis process for sustainable osmotic energy generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 383-393.
    7. Prante, Jeri L. & Ruskowitz, Jeffrey A. & Childress, Amy E. & Achilli, Andrea, 2014. "RO-PRO desalination: An integrated low-energy approach to seawater desalination," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 104-114.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Altaee, Ali & Zhou, John & Alhathal Alanezi, Adnan & Zaragoza, Guillermo, 2017. "Pressure retarded osmosis process for power generation: Feasibility, energy balance and controlling parameters," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 303-311.
    2. Maisonneuve, Jonathan & Chintalacheruvu, Sanjana, 2019. "Increasing osmotic power and energy with maximum power point tracking," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 683-695.
    3. Altaee, Ali & Cipolina, Andrea, 2019. "Modelling and optimization of modular system for power generation from a salinity gradient," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 139-147.
    4. Wang, Yu & Luo, Shirui & Guo, Jiaji & Liu, Ming & Wang, Jinshi & Yan, Junjie & Luo, Tengfei, 2020. "LIS-PRO: A new concept of power generation from low temperature heat using liquid-phase ion-stripping-induced salinity gradient," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    5. Manzoor, Husnain & Selam, Muaz A. & Abdur Rahman, Fahim Bin & Adham, Samer & Castier, Marcelo & Abdel-Wahab, Ahmed, 2020. "A tool for assessing the scalability of pressure-retarded osmosis (PRO) membranes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 987-999.
    6. Touati, Khaled & Rahaman, Md. Saifur, 2020. "Viability of pressure-retarded osmosis for harvesting energy from salinity gradients," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    7. Tawalbeh, Muhammad & Al-Othman, Amani & Abdelwahab, Noun & Alami, Abdul Hai & Olabi, Abdul Ghani, 2021. "Recent developments in pressure retarded osmosis for desalination and power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    8. Tufa, Ramato Ashu & Pawlowski, Sylwin & Veerman, Joost & Bouzek, Karel & Fontananova, Enrica & di Profio, Gianluca & Velizarov, Svetlozar & Goulão Crespo, João & Nijmeijer, Kitty & Curcio, Efrem, 2018. "Progress and prospects in reverse electrodialysis for salinity gradient energy conversion and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 290-331.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Altaee, Ali & Palenzuela, Patricia & Zaragoza, Guillermo & AlAnezi, Adnan Alhathal, 2017. "Single and dual stage closed-loop pressure retarded osmosis for power generation: Feasibility and performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 328-345.
    2. Tufa, Ramato Ashu & Pawlowski, Sylwin & Veerman, Joost & Bouzek, Karel & Fontananova, Enrica & di Profio, Gianluca & Velizarov, Svetlozar & Goulão Crespo, João & Nijmeijer, Kitty & Curcio, Efrem, 2018. "Progress and prospects in reverse electrodialysis for salinity gradient energy conversion and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 290-331.
    3. Wan, Chun Feng & Chung, Tai-Shung, 2018. "Techno-economic evaluation of various RO+PRO and RO+FO integrated processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1038-1050.
    4. Tawalbeh, Muhammad & Al-Othman, Amani & Abdelwahab, Noun & Alami, Abdul Hai & Olabi, Abdul Ghani, 2021. "Recent developments in pressure retarded osmosis for desalination and power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    5. Altaee, Ali & Zhou, John & Alhathal Alanezi, Adnan & Zaragoza, Guillermo, 2017. "Pressure retarded osmosis process for power generation: Feasibility, energy balance and controlling parameters," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 303-311.
    6. Maisonneuve, Jonathan & Chintalacheruvu, Sanjana, 2019. "Increasing osmotic power and energy with maximum power point tracking," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 683-695.
    7. Zadeh, Ali Etemad & Touati, Khaled & Mulligan, Catherine N. & McCutcheon, Jeffrey R. & Rahaman, Md. Saifur, 2022. "Closed-loop pressure retarded osmosis draw solutions and their regeneration processes: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    8. Long, Rui & Lai, Xiaotian & Liu, Zhichun & Liu, Wei, 2019. "Pressure retarded osmosis: Operating in a compromise between power density and energy efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 592-598.
    9. Bargiacchi, Eleonora & Orciuolo, Francesco & Ferrari, Lorenzo & Desideri, Umberto, 2020. "Use of Pressure-Retarded-Osmosis to reduce Reverse Osmosis energy consumption by exploiting hypersaline flows," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    10. Ortega-Delgado, B. & Giacalone, F. & Cipollina, A. & Papapetrou, M. & Kosmadakis, G. & Tamburini, A. & Micale, G., 2019. "Boosting the performance of a Reverse Electrodialysis – Multi-Effect Distillation Heat Engine by novel solutions and operating conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Wan, Chun Feng & Chung, Tai-Shung, 2016. "Energy recovery by pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) in SWRO–PRO integrated processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 687-698.
    12. Touati, Khaled & Tadeo, Fernando & Elfil, Hamza, 2017. "Osmotic energy recovery from Reverse Osmosis using two-stage Pressure Retarded Osmosis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 213-224.
    13. Jihye Kim & Kwanho Jeong & Myoung Jun Park & Ho Kyong Shon & Joon Ha Kim, 2015. "Recent Advances in Osmotic Energy Generation via Pressure-Retarded Osmosis (PRO): A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-25, October.
    14. Touati, Khaled & Usman, Haamid Sani & Mulligan, Catherine N. & Rahaman, Md. Saifur, 2020. "Energetic and economic feasibility of a combined membrane-based process for sustainable water and energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    15. Tufa, Ramato Ashu & Noviello, Ylenia & Di Profio, Gianluca & Macedonio, Francesca & Ali, Aamer & Drioli, Enrico & Fontananova, Enrica & Bouzek, Karel & Curcio, Efrem, 2019. "Integrated membrane distillation-reverse electrodialysis system for energy-efficient seawater desalination," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    16. Maisonneuve, Jonathan & Laflamme, Claude B. & Pillay, Pragasen, 2016. "Experimental investigation of pressure retarded osmosis for renewable energy conversion: Towards increased net power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 425-435.
    17. Farrell, Eanna & Hassan, Mohamed I. & Tufa, Ramato A. & Tuomiranta, Arttu & Avci, Ahmet H. & Politano, Antonio & Curcio, Efrem & Arafat, Hassan A., 2017. "Reverse electrodialysis powered greenhouse concept for water- and energy-self-sufficient agriculture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 390-409.
    18. He, Wei & Wang, Yang & Shaheed, Mohammad Hasan, 2015. "Maximum power point tracking (MPPT) of a scale-up pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) osmotic power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 584-596.
    19. Soleimanzade, Mohammad Amin & Kumar, Amit & Sadrzadeh, Mohtada, 2022. "Novel data-driven energy management of a hybrid photovoltaic-reverse osmosis desalination system using deep reinforcement learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    20. Giorgia Tomassi & Pietro Romano & Gabriele Di Giacomo, 2021. "Modern Use of Water Produced by Purification of Municipal Wastewater: A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-13, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:199:y:2017:i:c:p:359-369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.