IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v189y2017icp613-622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two-phase anaerobic digestion of municipal solid wastes enhanced by hydrothermal pretreatment: Viability, performance and microbial community evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Wei
  • Guo, Jianbin
  • Cheng, Huicai
  • Wang, Wei
  • Dong, Renjie

Abstract

The viability of hydrothermal pretreatment (HTP) to improve the efficiency of biogas production from municipal solid wastes (MSWs) is uncertain because there is always a trade-off between organic matters hydrolysis and recalcitrant melanoidins formation when applying HTP on different solid wastes. In this study, MSWs including waste activated sludge, fruit and vegetable residues, and kitchen wastes, with and without HTP were digested in the one phase and two-phase anaerobic digesters, respectively. Although the specific biogas production of MSWs in two-phase anaerobic digestion was significantly enhanced by HTP, no benefit could be found in one-phase anaerobic digestion because of the melanoidins formation. The specific biogas production of hydrothermally pretreated MSWs was much higher in two-phase anaerobic digestion (0.71Lbiogas/gVSadded) than that of MSWs in one-phase anaerobic digestion with or without HTP (0.53L and 0.55Lbiogas/gVSadded) when the butyric acid type fermentation dominated in the acidogenic phase. These findings indicated that the recalcitrant melanoidins formed in the HTP process were probably removed in the acidogenic digester. Differing from previous study, mixed-acid type fermentation, rather than ethanol type fermentation, was observed in the acidogenic digester fed with hydrothermally pretreated feedstock when pH was adjusted in the range of 4.0–4.5 with high oxidation reduction potential values of 49–97mV. The succeeding specific biogas production of mixed-acid type feedstock was only 0.59Lbiogas/gVSadded, which was lower than that of the butyric acid type feedstock. Microbial community structure was independent of the pH values and was substrate-specific in the acidogenic digesters. In the acidogenic digester with the HTP substrate, the phylum Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes increased, thereby possibly resulting from the increased content of soluble sugar and proteins in the HTP feedstock. Energy balance estimation of the four defined scenarios indicated that the combined HTP and two-phase AD in the MSWs treatment can achieve higher net energy output by 50.5–97.4% compared to the other three scenarios. This enables the combined process of HTP and two-phase AD to be a promising alternative way in the treatment of feedstock rich in protein and sugar.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Wei & Guo, Jianbin & Cheng, Huicai & Wang, Wei & Dong, Renjie, 2017. "Two-phase anaerobic digestion of municipal solid wastes enhanced by hydrothermal pretreatment: Viability, performance and microbial community evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 613-622.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:189:y:2017:i:c:p:613-622
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261916318724
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.101?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abubaker, J. & Risberg, K. & Pell, M., 2012. "Biogas residues as fertilisers – Effects on wheat growth and soil microbial activities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 126-134.
    2. Ariunbaatar, Javkhlan & Panico, Antonio & Esposito, Giovanni & Pirozzi, Francesco & Lens, Piet N.L., 2014. "Pretreatment methods to enhance anaerobic digestion of organic solid waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 143-156.
    3. Li, Yangyang & Jin, Yiying & Li, Jinhui & Nie, Yongfeng, 2016. "Enhanced nitrogen distribution and biomethanation of kitchen waste by thermal pre-treatment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 380-388.
    4. Zhen, Guangyin & Lu, Xueqin & Li, Yu-You & Zhao, Youcai, 2014. "Combined electrical-alkali pretreatment to increase the anaerobic hydrolysis rate of waste activated sludge during anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 93-102.
    5. Jain, Siddharth & Jain, Shivani & Wolf, Ingo Tim & Lee, Jonathan & Tong, Yen Wah, 2015. "A comprehensive review on operating parameters and different pretreatment methodologies for anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 142-154.
    6. Jiang, Xinyuan & Sommer, Sven G. & Christensen, Knud V., 2011. "A review of the biogas industry in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 6073-6081, October.
    7. Cano, R. & Pérez-Elvira, S.I. & Fdz-Polanco, F., 2015. "Energy feasibility study of sludge pretreatments: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 176-185.
    8. Monlau, Florian & Latrille, Eric & Da Costa, Aline Carvalho & Steyer, Jean-Philippe & Carrère, Hélène, 2013. "Enhancement of methane production from sunflower oil cakes by dilute acid pretreatment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1105-1113.
    9. Li, Yangyang & Jin, Yiying & Li, Jinhui & Li, Hailong & Yu, Zhixin, 2016. "Effects of thermal pretreatment on the biomethane yield and hydrolysis rate of kitchen waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 47-58.
    10. Li, Yangyang & Jin, Yiying, 2015. "Effects of thermal pretreatment on acidification phase during two-phase batch anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 550-557.
    11. Mendez, Lara & Mahdy, Ahmed & Ballesteros, Mercedes & González-Fernández, Cristina, 2014. "Methane production of thermally pretreated Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus sp. biomass at increasing biomass loads," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 238-242.
    12. Sambusiti, C. & Monlau, F. & Ficara, E. & Carrère, H. & Malpei, F., 2013. "A comparison of different pre-treatments to increase methane production from two agricultural substrates," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 62-70.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mao, Chunlan & Wang, Yanbo & Wang, Xiaojiao & Ren, Guangxin & Yuan, Liuyan & Feng, Yongzhong, 2019. "Correlations between microbial community and C:N:P stoichiometry during the anaerobic digestion process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 687-695.
    2. Luz, Fábio Codignole & Cordiner, Stefano & Manni, Alessandro & Mulone, Vincenzo & Rocco, Vittorio, 2017. "Anaerobic digestion of coffee grounds soluble fraction at laboratory scale: Evaluation of the biomethane potential," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 166-175.
    3. Darmawan, Arif & Budianto, Dwika & Aziz, Muhammad & Tokimatsu, Koji, 2017. "Retrofitting existing coal power plants through cofiring with hydrothermally treated empty fruit bunch and a novel integrated system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1138-1147.
    4. Usmani, Zeba & Sharma, Minaxi & Karpichev, Yevgen & Pandey, Ashok & Chander Kuhad, Ramesh & Bhat, Rajeev & Punia, Rajesh & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Gupta, Vijai Kumar, 2020. "Advancement in valorization technologies to improve utilization of bio-based waste in bioeconomy context," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    5. Kyle McGaughy & Ahmad Abu Hajer & Edward Drabold & David Bayless & M. Toufiq Reza, 2019. "Algal Remediation of Wastewater Produced from Hydrothermally Treated Septage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-8, June.
    6. Bao, Rui & Wei, Yufang & Guan, Ruolin & Li, Xiujin & Lu, Xuebin & Rong, Siyuan & Zuo, Xiaoyu & Yuan, Hairong, 2023. "High-solids anaerobic co-digestion performances and microbial community dynamics in co-digestion of different mixing ratios with food waste and highland barley straw," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    7. Theresa Menzel & Peter Neubauer & Stefan Junne, 2020. "Role of Microbial Hydrolysis in Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-29, October.
    8. Ayodele, T.R. & Ogunjuyigbe, A.S.O. & Alao, M.A., 2017. "Life cycle assessment of waste-to-energy (WtE) technologies for electricity generation using municipal solid waste in Nigeria," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 200-218.
    9. Brémond, Ulysse & de Buyer, Raphaëlle & Steyer, Jean-Philippe & Bernet, Nicolas & Carrere, Hélène, 2018. "Biological pretreatments of biomass for improving biogas production: an overview from lab scale to full-scale," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 583-604.
    10. Hosseini Koupaie, E. & Lin, L. & Bazyar Lakeh, A.A. & Azizi, A. & Dhar, B.R. & Hafez, H. & Elbeshbishy, E., 2021. "Performance evaluation and microbial community analysis of mesophilic and thermophilic sludge fermentation processes coupled with thermal hydrolysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    11. Ni, Ping & Lyu, Tao & Sun, Hao & Dong, Renjie & Wu, Shubiao, 2017. "Liquid digestate recycled utilization in anaerobic digestion of pig manure: Effect on methane production, system stability and heavy metal mobilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1695-1704.
    12. Monika Šabić Runjavec & Marija Vuković Domanovac & Ante Jukić, 2023. "Application of Industrial Wastewater and Sewage Sludge for Biohydrogen Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-15, March.
    13. Rosas-Mendoza, Erik Samuel & Alvarado-Vallejo, Andrea & Vallejo-Cantú, Norma Alejandra & Velasco-Santos, Carlos & Alvarado-Lassman, Alejandro, 2024. "Valorization of the complex organic waste in municipal solid wastes through the combination of hydrothermal carbonization and anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    14. Munir, M.T. & Mohaddespour, Ahmad & Nasr, A.T. & Carter, Susan, 2021. "Municipal solid waste-to-energy processing for a circular economy in New Zealand," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    15. Douglas Eldo Pereira de Oliveira & Amanda Carvalho Miranda & Milton Vieira Junior & José Carlos Curvelo Santana & Elias Basile Tambourgi & Francesco Facchini & Raffaello Iavagnilio & Luiz Fernando Rod, 2024. "Economic and Environmental Feasibility of Cogeneration from Food Waste: A Case Study in São Paulo City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhen, Guangyin & Lu, Xueqin & Kato, Hiroyuki & Zhao, Youcai & Li, Yu-You, 2017. "Overview of pretreatment strategies for enhancing sewage sludge disintegration and subsequent anaerobic digestion: Current advances, full-scale application and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 559-577.
    2. Kavitha, S. & Banu, J. Rajesh & Priya, A. Arul & Uan, Do Khac & Yeom, Ick Tae, 2017. "Liquefaction of food waste and its impacts on anaerobic biodegradability, energy ratio and economic feasibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 228-238.
    3. Zabed, Hossain M. & Akter, Suely & Yun, Junhua & Zhang, Guoyan & Zhang, Yufei & Qi, Xianghui, 2020. "Biogas from microalgae: Technologies, challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    4. Li, Yangyang & Jin, Yiying & Li, Jinhui & Li, Hailong & Yu, Zhixin, 2016. "Effects of thermal pretreatment on the biomethane yield and hydrolysis rate of kitchen waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 47-58.
    5. Ebenezer, A. Vimala & Arulazhagan, P. & Adish Kumar, S. & Yeom, Ick-Tae & Rajesh Banu, J., 2015. "Effect of deflocculation on the efficiency of low-energy microwave pretreatment and anaerobic biodegradation of waste activated sludge," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 104-110.
    6. Liao, Xiaocong & Li, Huan, 2015. "Biogas production from low-organic-content sludge using a high-solids anaerobic digester with improved agitation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 252-259.
    7. Elalami, D. & Carrere, H. & Monlau, F. & Abdelouahdi, K. & Oukarroum, A. & Barakat, A., 2019. "Pretreatment and co-digestion of wastewater sludge for biogas production: Recent research advances and trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Elsamadony, M. & Tawfik, A. & Suzuki, M., 2015. "Surfactant-enhanced biohydrogen production from organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) via dry anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 272-282.
    9. Wang, Hanxi & Xu, Jianling & Sheng, Lianxi, 2019. "Study on the comprehensive utilization of city kitchen waste as a resource in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 263-277.
    10. Monlau, F. & Sambusiti, C. & Antoniou, N. & Barakat, A. & Zabaniotou, A., 2015. "A new concept for enhancing energy recovery from agricultural residues by coupling anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 32-38.
    11. Roozbeh Feiz & Jonas Ammenberg & Annika Björn & Yufang Guo & Magnus Karlsson & Yonghui Liu & Yuxian Liu & Laura Shizue Moriga Masuda & Alex Enrich-Prast & Harald Rohracher & Kristina Trygg & Sepehr Sh, 2019. "Biogas Potential for Improved Sustainability in Guangzhou, China—A Study Focusing on Food Waste on Xiaoguwei Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, March.
    12. Yin, Yao & Liu, Ya-Juan & Meng, Shu-Juan & Kiran, Esra Uçkun & Liu, Yu, 2016. "Enzymatic pretreatment of activated sludge, food waste and their mixture for enhanced bioenergy recovery and waste volume reduction via anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1131-1137.
    13. Georgia-Christina Mitraka & Konstantinos N. Kontogiannopoulos & Maria Batsioula & George F. Banias & Anastasios I. Zouboulis & Panagiotis G. Kougias, 2022. "A Comprehensive Review on Pretreatment Methods for Enhanced Biogas Production from Sewage Sludge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-56, September.
    14. Zhang, Jingxin & Kan, Xiang & Shen, Ye & Loh, Kai-Chee & Wang, Chi-Hwa & Dai, Yanjun & Tong, Yen Wah, 2018. "A hybrid biological and thermal waste-to-energy system with heat energy recovery and utilization for solid organic waste treatment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 214-222.
    15. Budzianowski, Wojciech M., 2016. "A review of potential innovations for production, conditioning and utilization of biogas with multiple-criteria assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1148-1171.
    16. Bhatnagar, N. & Ryan, D. & Murphy, R. & Enright, A.M., 2022. "A comprehensive review of green policy, anaerobic digestion of animal manure and chicken litter feedstock potential – Global and Irish perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    17. Cheng, Shikun & Li, Zifu & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Neupane, Kalidas & Wauthelet, Marc & Huba, Elisabeth-Maria, 2014. "Application of fault tree approach for technical assessment of small-sized biogas systems in Nepal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1372-1381.
    18. Lübken, Manfred & Koch, Konrad & Gehring, Tito & Horn, Harald & Wichern, Marc, 2015. "Parameter estimation and long-term process simulation of a biogas reactor operated under trace elements limitation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 352-360.
    19. Li, Yue & Chen, Yinguang & Wu, Jiang, 2019. "Enhancement of methane production in anaerobic digestion process: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 120-137.
    20. Fernández-Polanco, D. & Tatsumi, H., 2016. "Optimum energy integration of thermal hydrolysis through pinch analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB), pages 1093-1102.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:189:y:2017:i:c:p:613-622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.