Author
Listed:
- Wu, Zongjun
- Cui, Ningbo
- Zhang, Wenjiang
- Yang, Yenan
- Gong, Daozhi
- Liu, Quanshan
- Zhao, Lu
- Xing, Liwen
- He, Qingyan
- Zhu, Shidan
- Zheng, Shunsheng
- Wen, Shenglin
- Zhu, Bin
Abstract
Accurate and timely prediction of soil moisture in orchards is crucial for making informed irrigation decisions at a regional scale. Conventional methods for monitoring soil moisture are often limited by high cost and disruption of soil structure, etc. However, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote sensing, with high spatial and temporal resolutions, offers an effective alternative for monitoring regional soil moisture. In this study, multi-modal UAV remote sensing data, including RGB, thermal infrared (TIR), and multi-spectral (Mul) data, were acquired in citrus orchards. The correlations between different sensor data and soil moisture were analyzed to construct seven input combinations. Convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM) models and a new hybrid model (CNN-LSTM), were employed to predict soil moisture at depths of 5 cm, 10 cm, 20 cm and 40 cm. Additionally, the impact of standalone sensor, texture features and multi-sensor data fusion on the accuracy of soil moisture prediction was explored. The results indicated that the model with RGB + Mul + TIR achieved the highest prediction accuracy, followed by those with Mul + TIR and RGB + Mul, with the coefficient of determination (R2) ranging 0.80–0.88, 0.64–0.84, and 0.60–0.81, and root mean square error (RMSE) ranging 2.46–2.99 m3·m−3, 2.86–3.89 m3·m−3 and 3.15–4.25 m3·m−3, respectively. Among single sensor inputs, the Mul sensor data has the highest prediction accuracy, followed by TIR and RGB sensor, with the coefficient of determination (R2) ranging 0.54–0.72, 0.36–0.52 and 0.14–0.26, and root mean square error (RMSE) ranging 3.72–4.58 %, 3.81–5.04 % and 4.27–6.21 %, respectively. The hybrid CNN-LSTM model exhibited the highest prediction accuracy, followed by CNN and LSTM models, with the coefficient of determination (R2) ranging 0.20–0.88, 0.16–0.83, and 0.14–0.81, and root mean square error (RMSE) ranging 2.46–5.01 m3·m−3, 2.68–5.35 m3·m−3 and 2.81–6.21 m3·m−3, respectively. The prediction accuracy of the models was the highest at the depth of 5 cm, followed by 10 cm, 20 cm and 40 cm, with the coefficient of determination (R2) average of 0.63, 0.62, 0.59, and 0.55, and root mean square error (RMSE) average of 3.70 m3·m−3, 3.79 m3·m−3, 3.85 m3·m−3 and 4.21 m3·m−3, respectively. Therefore, the hybrid CNN-LSTM model with RGB + Mul + TIR is recommended to predict soil moisture in citrus orchard. It provides method and data support for regional precision irrigation decision-making.
Suggested Citation
Wu, Zongjun & Cui, Ningbo & Zhang, Wenjiang & Yang, Yenan & Gong, Daozhi & Liu, Quanshan & Zhao, Lu & Xing, Liwen & He, Qingyan & Zhu, Shidan & Zheng, Shunsheng & Wen, Shenglin & Zhu, Bin, 2024.
"Estimation of soil moisture in drip-irrigated citrus orchards using multi-modal UAV remote sensing,"
Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:302:y:2024:i:c:s037837742400307x
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108972
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:302:y:2024:i:c:s037837742400307x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.