IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i20p13232-d942800.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Temporal and Spatial Changes of Ecological Environment Quality Based on RSEI: A Case Study in Ulan Mulun River Basin, China

Author

Listed:
  • Meng Luo

    (College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China)

  • Shengwei Zhang

    (College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China
    Key Laboratory of Water Resources Protection and Utilization of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hohhot 010018, China
    Key Laboratory of Large Data Research and Application of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hohhot 010018, China)

  • Lei Huang

    (College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China
    Key Laboratory of Water Resources Protection and Utilization of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hohhot 010018, China)

  • Zhiqiang Liu

    (College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China)

  • Lin Yang

    (College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China)

  • Ruishen Li

    (College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China)

  • Xi Lin

    (College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China)

Abstract

The Ulan Mulun River Basin is an essential ecological protective screen of the Mu Us Desert and a necessary energy base in Ordos City. With the acceleration of industrialization and urbanization, human activities have caused enormous challenges to the local ecological environment. To achieve the region’s economic sustainability and make local development plans more objective, it is necessary to evaluate the basin’s ecological environment quality over a period of time. First, in the Landsat historical images, we selected 5 years of data to investigate the changes in this time-period (2000–2020). Second, based on the opened remote sensing database on Google Earth Engine, we calculated the remote-sensing ecological index (RSEI) distribution map. RSEI includes greenness, temperature, humidity, and dryness. Thirdly, we assessed the ecological-environmental distribution and change characteristics in the Ulan Mulun River Basin. Finally, we analyzed the RSEI spatial auto-correlation distribution characteristics in the study area. The mean values of RSEI in 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020 were 0.418, 0.421, 0.443, 0.456, and 0.507, respectively, which indicated that the ecological environment quality had gradually improved. The ecological environment quality from 2000 to 2005 had the biggest change, as the area with drastically changed water levels accounted for 78.98% of the total basin. It showed a downward trend in the central and western regions. It showed an upward trend in the eastern region. For 20 years, the area of deterioration decreased by 24.37%, and the slight change area increased by 45.84%. The Global Moran’s I value ranged from 0.324 to 0.568. The results demonstrated that the Ulan Mulun River Basin ecological environment quality spatial distribution was positively correlated, and the clustering degree decreased gradually. Local spatial auto-correlation of RSEI showed that high-high(H-H) was mainly distributed in the basin’s eastern and southern regions, where the population density was low and the vegetation was in good condition. Low-low(L-L) was mainly distributed in the basin’s central regions and western regions, where the population density was high, and the industrial and mining enterprises were concentrated. This study provided a theoretical basis for the sustainable development of the Ulan Mulun River Basin, which is crucial for the local ecological environment and economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Meng Luo & Shengwei Zhang & Lei Huang & Zhiqiang Liu & Lin Yang & Ruishen Li & Xi Lin, 2022. "Temporal and Spatial Changes of Ecological Environment Quality Based on RSEI: A Case Study in Ulan Mulun River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13232-:d:942800
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13232/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13232/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaole Wen & Yanli Ming & Yonggang Gao & Xinyu Hu, 2019. "Dynamic Monitoring and Analysis of Ecological Quality of Pingtan Comprehensive Experimental Zone, a New Type of Sea Island City, Based on RSEI," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Ruihao Cui & Jiazheng Han & Zhenqi Hu, 2022. "Assessment of Spatial Temporal Changes of Ecological Environment Quality: A Case Study in Huaibei City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Congjian Sun & Xiaoming Li & Wenqiang Zhang & Xingong Li, 2020. "Evolution of Ecological Security in the Tableland Region of the Chinese Loess Plateau Using a Remote-Sensing-Based Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Zhongfa Zhou & Qing Feng & Changli Zhu & Wanlin Luo & Lingyu Wang & Xin Zhao & Lu Zhang, 2022. "The Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Ecological Environment Quality in Karst Ecologically Fragile Areas Driven by Poverty Alleviation Resettlement," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Cheng, Minghan & Jiao, Xiyun & Liu, Yadong & Shao, Mingchao & Yu, Xun & Bai, Yi & Wang, Zixu & Wang, Siyu & Tuohuti, Nuremanguli & Liu, Shuaibing & Shi, Lei & Yin, Dameng & Huang, Xiao & Nie, Chenwei , 2022. "Estimation of soil moisture content under high maize canopy coverage from UAV multimodal data and machine learning," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    6. Xuting Yang & Wanqiang Yao & Pengfei Li & Jinfei Hu & Hooman Latifi & Li Kang & Ningjing Wang & Dingming Zhang, 2022. "Changes of SOC Content in China’s Shendong Coal Mining Area during 1990–2020 Investigated Using Remote Sensing Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Hesham M. Aboelsoud & Mohamed A. E. AbdelRahman & Ahmed M. S. Kheir & Mona S. M. Eid & Khalil A. Ammar & Tamer H. Khalifa & Antonio Scopa, 2022. "Quantitative Estimation of Saline-Soil Amelioration Using Remote-Sensing Indices in Arid Land for Better Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Yongbin Zhang & Tanglei Song & Jihao Fan & Weidong Man & Mingyue Liu & Yongqiang Zhao & Hao Zheng & Yahui Liu & Chunyu Li & Jingru Song & Xiaowu Yang & Junmin Du, 2022. "Land Use and Climate Change Altered the Ecological Quality in the Luanhe River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-22, June.
    9. Mondol, Md Anarul Haque & Zhu, Xuan & Dunkerley, David & Henley, Benjamin J., 2021. "Observed meteorological drought trends in Bangladesh identified with the Effective Drought Index (EDI)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    10. Alistair W. R. Seddon & Marc Macias-Fauria & Peter R. Long & David Benz & Kathy J. Willis, 2016. "Sensitivity of global terrestrial ecosystems to climate variability," Nature, Nature, vol. 531(7593), pages 229-232, March.
    11. Zeke Lian & Huichao Hao & Jing Zhao & Kaizhong Cao & Hesong Wang & Zhechen He, 2022. "Evaluation of Remote Sensing Ecological Index Based on Soil and Water Conservation on the Effectiveness of Management of Abandoned Mine Landscaping Transformation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-15, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xingming Yuan & Bing Guo, 2022. "Dynamic Monitoring of the Ecological Vulnerability for Multi-Type Ecological Functional Areas during 2000–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, November.
    2. Xin Dai & Jianping Chen & Chenli Xue, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Patterns and Driving Factors of the Ecological Environmental Quality along the Jakarta–Bandung High-Speed Railway in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.
    3. Xiaoyu Li & Jiawei Tang & Chao Feng & Yexiao Chen, 2023. "Can Government Environmental Auditing Help to Improve Environmental Quality? Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-21, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu Bi & Bianrong Chang & Fen Hou & Zihan Yang & Qi Fu & Bo Li, 2021. "Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Variation and Driving Mechanism of Ecological Environment Quality in the Arid Regions of Central Asia, Xinjiang," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Xueling Zhang & Ruoxuan Huang & Yixuan Yang, 2022. "On the Landscape Activity Measure Coupling Ecological Index and Public Vitality Index of UGI: The Case Study of Zhongshan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-32, October.
    3. Shangxiao Wang & Ming Zhang & Xi Xi, 2022. "Ecological Environment Evaluation Based on Remote Sensing Ecological Index: A Case Study in East China over the Past 20 Years," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Xueman Zuo & Jiazheng Li & Ludan Zhang & Zhilong Wu & Sen Lin & Xisheng Hu, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Variations in Ecological Quality and Its Response to Topography and Road Network Based on GEE: Taking the Minjiang River Basin as a Case," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, September.
    5. Qiang Liu & Feihong Yu & Xingmin Mu, 2022. "Evaluation of the Ecological Environment Quality of the Kuye River Source Basin Using the Remote Sensing Ecological Index," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Jiayu Xia & Duyuzheng Ren & Xuhui Wang & Bo Xu & Xingyao Zhong & Yajiang Fan, 2023. "Ecosystem Quality Assessment and Ecological Restoration in Fragile Zone of Loess Plateau: A Case Study of Suide County, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-32, May.
    7. Deng, Juntao & Pan, Shijia & Zhou, Mingu & Gao, Wen & Yan, Yuncai & Niu, Zijie & Han, Wenting, 2023. "Optimum sampling window size and vegetation index selection for low-altitude multispectral estimation of root soil moisture content for Xuxiang Kiwifruit," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    8. Sharaniya Vijitharan & Nophea Sasaki & Manjunatha Venkatappa & Nitin Kumar Tripathi & Issei Abe & Takuji W. Tsusaka, 2022. "Assessment of Forest Cover Changes in Vavuniya District, Sri Lanka: Implications for the Establishment of Subnational Forest Reference Emission Level," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-25, July.
    9. Fuyu Yang & Jingjing Xu & Xin Zhao & Xuekai Wang & Yi Xiong, 2022. "Assessment of the Grassland Ecological Compensation Policy (GECP) in Qinghai, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, September.
    10. Li Yang & Yue Xu & Junqi Zhu & Keyu Sun, 2024. "Research on Water Ecological Resilience Measurement and Influencing Factors: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-23, August.
    11. Junhao Liu & Zhe Hao & Jianli Ding & Yukun Zhang & Zhiguo Miao & Yu Zheng & Alimira Alimu & Huiling Cheng & Xiang Li, 2024. "Ensemble Machine-Learning-Based Framework for Estimating Surface Soil Moisture Using Sentinel-1/2 Data: A Case Study of an Arid Oasis in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, October.
    12. Shulin Chen & Zhenghao Zhu & Xiaotong Liu & Li Yang, 2022. "Variation in Vegetation and Its Driving Force in the Pearl River Delta Region of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-15, August.
    13. Huang, Ze & Liu, Yu & Qiu, Kaiyang & López-Vicente, Manuel & Shen, Weibo & Wu, Gao-Lin, 2021. "Soil-water deficit in deep soil layers results from the planted forest in a semi-arid sandy land: Implications for sustainable agroforestry water management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    14. Mondol, Md Anarul Haque & Zhu, Xuan & Dunkerley, David & Henley, Benjamin J., 2022. "Changing occurrence of crop water surplus or deficit and the impact of irrigation: An analysis highlighting consequences for rice production in Bangladesh," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    15. Kaizheng Xiang & Anzhou Zhao & Haixin Liu & Xiangrui Zhang & Anbing Zhang & Xinle Tian & Zihan Jin, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Coupling Pattern Analysis of Urbanization and Ecological Environmental Quality of the Chinese Loess Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Yuhao Jin & Han Zhang & Yuchao Yan & Peitong Cong, 2020. "A Semi-Parametric Geographically Weighted Regression Approach to Exploring Driving Factors of Fractional Vegetation Cover: A Case Study of Guangdong," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    17. Binhua Zhao & Jianchun Han & Peng Li & Hongtao Li & Yangfan Feng & Bingze Hu & Guojun Zhang & Jie Li, 2023. "Evidence for Urbanization Effects on Eco-Environmental Quality: A Case Study of Guyuan City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.
    18. Henry R. Scharf & Ann M. Raiho & Sierra Pugh & Carl A. Roland & David K. Swanson & Sarah E. Stehn & Mevin B. Hooten, 2022. "Multivariate Bayesian clustering using covariate‐informed components with application to boreal vegetation sensitivity," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 1427-1440, December.
    19. Gokhan Yildirim & Ataur Rahman, 2022. "Spatiotemporal meteorological drought assessment: a case study in south-east Australia," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(1), pages 305-332, March.
    20. Cecilia Parracciani & Robert Buitenwerf & Jens-Christian Svenning, 2023. "Impacts of Climate Change on Vegetation in Kenya: Future Projections and Implications for Protected Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13232-:d:942800. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.