Author
Listed:
- Liu, Quanshan
- Wu, Zongjun
- Cui, Ningbo
- Zheng, Shunsheng
- Zhu, Shidan
- Jiang, Shouzheng
- Wang, Zhihui
- Gong, Daozhi
- Wang, Yaosheng
- Zhao, Lu
Abstract
Soil moisture content (SMC), as a pivotal component in the energy and matter exchange processes within the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum, plays a crucial role in surface water dynamics, energy fluxes, and carbon cycling within ecosystems. The development of remote sensing technology has offered new perspectives for monitoring soil moisture at regional scales. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) equip with multispectral have distinct advantages for vegetation monitoring, including rapidity and cost-effectiveness, which has superior applicability and practicality. Therefore, in a 5a "Daya" late-maturing citrus orchard, the vegetation index (VI) and texture feature (TF) information of citrus canopy based on UAV multi-spectral images were extracted, and soil and plant analyzer development (SPAD) of citrus was collected. These different data sources were integrated into the framework of the random forest algorithm (RF) and genetic algorithm-optimized random forest (GA-RF) to evaluate the accuracy of surface SMC (SSMC) estimation in citrus orchard. The Biswas model was utilized to simulate the root zone SMC (RSMC). The spatiotemporal variations of SMC in citrus orchard were analyzed, and the potential of low-cost sensor-equipped drones in rapidly acquiring spatial and temporal distribution information of SMC at a large regional scale was explored. The results indicated that the GA-RF models outperformed the RF models in estimating citrus orchard SMC (with R2 ranging from 0.502 to 0.949 and RMSE ranging from 0.552 % to 3.166 % for GA-RF, compared to R2 ranging from 0.430 to 0.936 and RMSE ranging from 0.587 % to 3.449 % for the RF). The GA-RF models using VI+SPAD as inputs exhibited the best performance for SMC at depths of 5 cm, 10 cm, 20 cm and 40 cm (SMC5, SMC10, SMC20 and SMC40) across citrus growth stages (R2 ranging from 0.793 to 0.949 at 5 cm, R2 ranging from 0.702 to 0.938 at 10 cm, R2 ranging from 0.714 to 0.927 at 20 cm). In bud bust to flowering, young fruit and fruit maturation stages (stage Ⅰ, ⅠⅠ and ⅠⅤ), all models demonstrated good accuracy in estimating SMC at depth of 10 cm (R2 ranging from 0.567 to 0.908 in stage Ⅰ, with R2 ranging from 0.681 to 0.916 in stage ⅠⅠ and R2 ranging from 0.579 to 0.938 in stage ⅠⅤ). In fruit expansion stage (stage III), the models performed best in predicting SMC5 (R2 ranging from 0.698 to 0.861). The Biswas model was constructed to simulate SMC40 by utilizing the inverted SMC10 and SMC20, thereby generating spatiotemporal distribution maps of SMC at different depths in citrus orchard. The SSMC was susceptible to environmental factors, exhibiting significant spatiotemporal heterogeneity. In summary, this study illustrated that the integration of multiple data sources into GA-RF enhanced the estimation performance of SMC at different growth stages of late-maturing citrus orchard in the Southwest China. Additionally, it enabled the rapid and efficient monitoring of spatiotemporal variations in SMC, providing an effective method and practical foundation for precision irrigation and improved water use efficiency.
Suggested Citation
Liu, Quanshan & Wu, Zongjun & Cui, Ningbo & Zheng, Shunsheng & Zhu, Shidan & Jiang, Shouzheng & Wang, Zhihui & Gong, Daozhi & Wang, Yaosheng & Zhao, Lu, 2024.
"Soil moisture content estimation of drip-irrigated citrus orchard based on UAV images and machine learning algorithm in Southwest China,"
Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:303:y:2024:i:c:s0378377424004050
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109069
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:303:y:2024:i:c:s0378377424004050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.