IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v180y2017ipap13-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating performance of macroscopic water uptake models at productive growth stages of durum wheat under saline conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Jalali, Vahidreza
  • Asadi Kapourchal, Safoora
  • Homaee, Mehdi

Abstract

Water management in agricultural lands largely depends on quantity and quality of available soil and water resources. In arid and semi arid regions, scarcity of fresh water and soil salinity are two main important limiting factors for crop production. Under such limiting conditions, one practical alternative for crop production is the use of unconventional or brackish water. If used, the quantitative response of plants to salinity must be carefully analyzed by means of modeling. On the other hand, plant response to salinity varies under different growth stages. Durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L.) is an important crop cultivated in some arid and semi-arid areas across the world such as Middle East and North Africa. This study was aimed to quantitatively characterize the Durum wheat response to salinity under different productive growth stages. Consequently, a large experiment in natural saline sandy loam soil (Typic Toriorthent) with five natural saline water treatments including 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 dS/m each with three replicates was conducted. Furthermore, four predictive linear and nonlinear models of Maas and Hoffman, van Genuchten and Hoffman, Dirksen et al. and Homaee et al. were evaluated to predict relative transpiration and relative yield of durum wheat under heading and ripening growth stages. Three statistics including modified coefficient efficiency (E'), modified index of agreement (d') and coefficient of residual mass (CRM) were used to compare the used models and to assess their performances. Results indicated that among the examined models, the macroscopic model of Homaee et al. can provide more reasonable predictions at heading stage, while the piece-wise linear model of Maas and Hoffman provided slightly better prediction at ripening growth stage. The obtained threshold value and slope of reduction yield were quite different from those previously reported in the literature. These findings reveal that the widely cited tables describing the relationship between relative yield and electrical conductivity of saturated extract, averaged over the root zone as well as the entire growing season, are quite approximate and carry significant uncertainty. More experimental studies are still needed to obtain reliable data under different growth stages.

Suggested Citation

  • Jalali, Vahidreza & Asadi Kapourchal, Safoora & Homaee, Mehdi, 2017. "Evaluating performance of macroscopic water uptake models at productive growth stages of durum wheat under saline conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 180(PA), pages 13-21.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:180:y:2017:i:pa:p:13-21
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.10.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377416304012
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.10.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pedrero, F. & Maestre-Valero, J.F. & Mounzer, O. & Nortes, P.A. & Alcobendas, R. & Romero-Trigueros, C. & Bayona, J.M. & Alarcón, J.J. & Nicolás, E., 2015. "Response of young ‘Star Ruby’ grapefruit trees to regulated deficit irrigation with saline reclaimed water," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 51-60.
    2. Nouri, Milad & Homaee, Mehdi & Bannayan, Mohammad & Hoogenboom, Gerrit, 2016. "Towards modeling soil texture-specific sensitivity of wheat yield and water balance to climatic changes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 248-263.
    3. Katerji, N. & van Hoorn, J.W. & Fares, C. & Hamdy, A. & Mastrorilli, M. & Oweis, T., 2005. "Salinity effect on grain quality of two durum wheat varieties differing in salt tolerance," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 85-91, July.
    4. Chamekh, Zoubeir & Karmous, Chahine & Ayadi, Sawsen & Sahli, Ali & Hammami, Zied & Belhaj Fraj, Makram & Benaissa, Nadhira & Trifa, Youssef & Slim-Amara, Hajer, 2015. "Stability analysis of yield component traits in 25 durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) genotypes under contrasting irrigation water salinity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1-6.
    5. Homaee, M. & Dirksen, C. & Feddes, R. A., 2002. "Simulation of root water uptake: I. Non-uniform transient salinity using different macroscopic reduction functions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 89-109, October.
    6. Josephson, Anna Leigh & Ricker-Gilbert, Jacob & Florax, Raymond J.G.M., 2014. "How does population density influence agricultural intensification and productivity? Evidence from Ethiopia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 142-152.
    7. Homaee, M. & Feddes, R. A. & Dirksen, C., 2002. "Simulation of root water uptake: II. Non-uniform transient water stress using different reduction functions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 111-126, October.
    8. Homaee, M. & Feddes, R. A. & Dirksen, C., 2002. "Simulation of root water uptake: III. Non-uniform transient combined salinity and water stress," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 127-144, October.
    9. Saadat, Saeed & Homaee, Mehdi, 2015. "Modeling sorghum response to irrigation water salinity at early growth stage," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 119-124.
    10. Ricker-Gilbert, Jacob & Jumbe, Charles & Chamberlin, Jordan, 2014. "How does population density influence agricultural intensification and productivity? Evidence from Malawi," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 114-128.
    11. Yang, Y.N. & Sheng, Q. & Zhang, L. & Kang, H.Q. & Liu, Y., 2015. "Desalination of saline farmland drainage water through wetland plants," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 19-29.
    12. Chinnasamy, Pennan & Misra, Gourav & Shah, Tushaar & Maheshwari, Basant & Prathapar, Sanmugam, 2015. "Evaluating the effectiveness of water infrastructures for increasing groundwater recharge and agricultural production – A case study of Gujarat, India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 179-188.
    13. Safa, M. & Samarasinghe, S., 2011. "Determination and modelling of energy consumption in wheat production using neural networks: “A case study in Canterbury province, New Zealand”," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 5140-5147.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rania M. El-Shal & Ahmed H. El-Naggar & Talaat R. El-Beshbeshy & Esawy K. Mahmoud & Nasser I. Abd El-Kader & Ali M. Missaui & Daolin Du & Adel M. Ghoneim & Mahmoud S. El-Sharkawy, 2022. "Effect of Nano-Fertilizers on Alfalfa Plants Grown under Different Salt Stresses in Hydroponic System," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Wang, Lichun & Ning, Songrui & Chen, Xiaoli & Li, Youli & Guo, Wenzhong & Ben-Gal, Alon, 2021. "Modeling tomato root water uptake influenced by soil salinity under drip irrigation with an inverse method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    3. Muhammad, Tahir & Zhou, Bo & Liu, Zeyuan & Chen, Xiuzhi & Li, Yunkai, 2021. "Effects of phosphorus-fertigation on emitter clogging in drip irrigation system with saline water," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    4. Li, Jianshe & Gao, Yanming & Zhang, Xueyan & Tian, Ping & Li, Juan & Tian, Yongqiang, 2019. "Comprehensive comparison of different saline water irrigation strategies for tomato production: Soil properties, plant growth, fruit yield and fruit quality," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 521-533.
    5. Li, Jingang & He, Pingru & Chen, Jing & Hamad, Amar Ali Adam & Dai, Xiaoping & Jin, Qiu & Ding, Siyu, 2023. "Tomato performance and changes in soil chemistry in response to salinity and Na/Ca ratio of irrigation water," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nouri, Milad & Homaee, Mehdi & Bannayan, Mohammad & Hoogenboom, Gerrit, 2017. "Towards shifting planting date as an adaptation practice for rainfed wheat response to climate change," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 108-119.
    2. Nouri, Milad & Homaee, Mehdi & Bannayan, Mohammad & Hoogenboom, Gerrit, 2016. "Towards modeling soil texture-specific sensitivity of wheat yield and water balance to climatic changes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 248-263.
    3. Nayebloie, Fatemeh & Kouchakzadeh, Mahdi & Ebrahimi, Kumars & Homaee, Mahdi & Abbasi, Fariborz, 2022. "Improving fertigation efficiency by numerical modelling in a lettuce subsurface drip irrigation farm," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    4. Rashki, Paria & piri, halimeh & Khamari, Eisa, 2022. "Determining the production function and optimal irrigation depth of Roselle in deficit irrigation conditions and using potassium fertilizer," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    5. Barnard, J.H. & Bennie, A.T.P. & van Rensburg, L.D. & Preez, C.C. du, 2015. "SWAMP: A soil layer water supply model for simulating macroscopic crop water uptake under osmotic stress," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 150-163.
    6. Wang, Tianshu & Xu, Yanqi & Zuo, Qiang & Shi, Jianchu & Wu, Xun & Liu, Lining & Sheng, Jiandong & Jiang, Pingan & Ben-Gal, Alon, 2023. "Evaluating and improving soil water and salinity stress response functions for root water uptake," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    7. Skaggs, Todd H. & van Genuchten, Martinus Th. & Shouse, Peter J. & Poss, James A., 2006. "Macroscopic approaches to root water uptake as a function of water and salinity stress," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(1-2), pages 140-149, November.
    8. Milad Nouri & Mehdi Homaee & Mohammad Bannayan, 2017. "Quantitative Trend, Sensitivity and Contribution Analyses of Reference Evapotranspiration in some Arid Environments under Climate Change," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(7), pages 2207-2224, May.
    9. Liu, Lining & Wang, Tianshu & Wang, Lichun & Wu, Xun & Zuo, Qiang & Shi, Jianchu & Sheng, Jiandong & Jiang, Pingan & Chen, Quanjia & Ben-Gal, Alon, 2022. "Plant water deficit index-based irrigation under conditions of salinity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    10. Wu, Xun & Zhang, Wenjing & Liu, Wen & Zuo, Qiang & Shi, Jianchu & Yan, Xudong & Zhang, Hongfei & Xue, Xuzhang & Wang, Lichun & Zhang, Mo & Ben-Gal, Alon, 2017. "Root-weighted soil water status for plant water deficit index based irrigation scheduling," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 137-147.
    11. Saadat, Saeed & Homaee, Mehdi, 2015. "Modeling sorghum response to irrigation water salinity at early growth stage," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 119-124.
    12. Ritzema, H.P., 2016. "Drain for Gain: Managing salinity in irrigated lands—A review," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 18-28.
    13. Wang, Lichun & Ning, Songrui & Chen, Xiaoli & Li, Youli & Guo, Wenzhong & Ben-Gal, Alon, 2021. "Modeling tomato root water uptake influenced by soil salinity under drip irrigation with an inverse method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    14. Rosa, R.D. & Ramos, T.B. & Pereira, L.S., 2016. "The dual Kc approach to assess maize and sweet sorghum transpiration and soil evaporation under saline conditions: Application of the SIMDualKc model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 77-94.
    15. Wang, Lichun & Shi, Jianchu & Zuo, Qiang & Zheng, Wenjuan & Zhu, Xiangming, 2012. "Optimizing parameters of salinity stress reduction function using the relationship between root-water-uptake and root nitrogen mass of winter wheat," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 142-152.
    16. Nancy McCarthy & Talip Kilic & Alejandro de la Fuente & Joshua M. Brubaker, 2018. "Shelter from the Storm? Household-Level Impacts of, and Responses to, the 2015 Floods in Malawi," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 237-258, October.
    17. Homaee, M. & Feddes, R. A. & Dirksen, C., 2002. "Simulation of root water uptake: III. Non-uniform transient combined salinity and water stress," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 127-144, October.
    18. repec:lic:licosd:37416 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Wu, Xun & Zuo, Qiang & Shi, Jianchu & Wang, Lichun & Xue, Xuzhang & Ben-Gal, Alon, 2020. "Introducing water stress hysteresis to the Feddes empirical macroscopic root water uptake model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    20. Gaetano Perone, 2020. "The impact of agribusiness crimes on food prices: evidence from Italy," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 37(3), pages 877-909, October.
    21. Tiberti, M. & Zezza, A. & Azzarri, C., 2018. "Livestock Ownership and Child Nutrition in Uganda: Evidence from a Panel Survey," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277403, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:180:y:2017:i:pa:p:13-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.