IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v270y2022ics0378377422002682.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving fertigation efficiency by numerical modelling in a lettuce subsurface drip irrigation farm

Author

Listed:
  • Nayebloie, Fatemeh
  • Kouchakzadeh, Mahdi
  • Ebrahimi, Kumars
  • Homaee, Mahdi
  • Abbasi, Fariborz

Abstract

Management strategies that lead to efficient fertigation are essential to minimize nitrate (N) leakage and environmental issues and to optimize crop yield. A helpful way for agricultural water and nutrient management is studying the water and solute movement by models. The objective of this study is to use the Hydrus-2D model to evaluate different nitrate fertigation strategies for improving fertigation management efficiency. The model was calibrated and validated for 2-years field unpublished data with Iceberg Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) for Subsurface Drip Irrigation (SDI) system under wastewater strategies. The validation of the water content model showed that the maximum and average of RMSE are equal to 1.2 and 0.7 cm3/cm3, respectively. Also, the Hydrus model performance was acceptable to simulate soil water content. The results of the soil Nitrate movement model showed the average RMSE is 2.77 mg/l with R2 = 0.97. Different scenarios in fertigation intervals, fertigation time, replacement of drip line, nitrate concentration of wastewater, different nitrate concentrations, and times of fertigation through the growing season were defined. The results of these scenarios analyze to find maximum water uptake and minimum deep percolation, which help to achieve a drip irrigation design with minimal losses and the best efficiency. Scenario results showed that reducing fertigation time by 60% and halving the fertigation interval increase the uptake of water and nitrate by 3.89% and 11.55%, while the rate of deep percolation decreased by 27%. The results of dripline replacement scenarios showed that the depth of 12 cm, without moving in the horizontal direction, has created more favorable conditions. The result of increasing nitrate concentration shows that up to 24.2 mg/l nitrate concentration, increment the plant nitrate uptake by 63.25%, however increasing more than 36.6 mg/l of nitrate concentration had no significant effect on plant nitrate uptake. For finding the best time of fertigation through the growing season, 42 scenarios were defined. All applied nitrate injected into 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 11 irrigation events equally, form 6 fertigation strategies of F, B, T, Q, E, and C respectively. Based on which irrigation number, fertigation strategies start, indices 1–11 are assigned to these 6 fertigation strategies. Based on the results, the best fertigation strategies in this study, were F5, B4, T3, and Q3, which have minimum nitrate leaching losses of 17.79%, 19.9%, 20.8%, and 20.0%, respectively, while had high root nitrate uptake equal to 25.1%, 26.3%, 26.6%, and 26.6%, respectively. Therefore, fertigation of lettuce is most efficient at 22–30 days after planting, equal to 30–38 days before harvesting for the silty clay loam lettuce farm, under SDI at 12 cm depth conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Nayebloie, Fatemeh & Kouchakzadeh, Mahdi & Ebrahimi, Kumars & Homaee, Mahdi & Abbasi, Fariborz, 2022. "Improving fertigation efficiency by numerical modelling in a lettuce subsurface drip irrigation farm," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:270:y:2022:i:c:s0378377422002682
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377422002682
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107721?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hassan-Esfahani, Leila & Torres-Rua, Alfonso & McKee, Mac, 2015. "Assessment of optimal irrigation water allocation for pressurized irrigation system using water balance approach, learning machines, and remotely sensed data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 42-50.
    2. Kandelous, Maziar M. & Simunek, Jirí, 2010. "Numerical simulations of water movement in a subsurface drip irrigation system under field and laboratory conditions using HYDRUS-2D," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(7), pages 1070-1076, July.
    3. Homaee, M. & Dirksen, C. & Feddes, R. A., 2002. "Simulation of root water uptake: I. Non-uniform transient salinity using different macroscopic reduction functions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 89-109, October.
    4. Mojid, M.A. & Wyseure, G.C.L. & Biswas, S.K. & Hossain, A.B.M.Z., 2010. "Farmers' perceptions and knowledge in using wastewater for irrigation at twelve peri-urban areas and two sugar mill areas in Bangladesh," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 79-86, December.
    5. Phogat, V. & Skewes, Mark A. & Mahadevan, M. & Cox, J.W., 2013. "Evaluation of soil plant system response to pulsed drip irrigation of an almond tree under sustained stress conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-11.
    6. Karandish, Fatemeh & Šimůnek, Jiří, 2017. "Two-dimensional modeling of nitrogen and water dynamics for various N-managed water-saving irrigation strategies using HYDRUS," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 174-190.
    7. Qadir, M. & Wichelns, D. & Raschid-Sally, L. & McCornick, P.G. & Drechsel, P. & Bahri, A. & Minhas, P.S., 2010. "The challenges of wastewater irrigation in developing countries," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(4), pages 561-568, April.
    8. Gardenas, A.I. & Hopmans, J.W. & Hanson, B.R. & Simunek, J., 2005. "Two-dimensional modeling of nitrate leaching for various fertigation scenarios under micro-irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 74(3), pages 219-242, June.
    9. Chojnacka, K. & Witek-Krowiak, A. & Moustakas, K. & Skrzypczak, D. & Mikula, K. & Loizidou, M., 2020. "A transition from conventional irrigation to fertigation with reclaimed wastewater: Prospects and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    10. Urbano, Vanessa Ribeiro & Mendonça, Thaís Grandizoli & Bastos, Reinaldo Gaspar & Souza, Claudinei Fonseca, 2017. "Effects of treated wastewater irrigation on soil properties and lettuce yield," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 108-115.
    11. Ajdary, Khalil & Singh, D.K. & Singh, A.K. & Khanna, Manoj, 2007. "Modelling of nitrogen leaching from experimental onion field under drip fertigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(1-2), pages 15-28, April.
    12. Mailhol, Jean Claude & Ruelle, Pierre & Walser, Sabine & Schütze, Niels & Dejean, Cyril, 2011. "Analysis of AET and yield predictions under surface and buried drip irrigation systems using the Crop Model PILOTE and Hydrus-2D," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(6), pages 1033-1044, April.
    13. Homaee, M. & Feddes, R. A. & Dirksen, C., 2002. "Simulation of root water uptake: II. Non-uniform transient water stress using different reduction functions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 111-126, October.
    14. Homaee, M. & Feddes, R. A. & Dirksen, C., 2002. "Simulation of root water uptake: III. Non-uniform transient combined salinity and water stress," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 127-144, October.
    15. Yang, J.M. & Yang, J.Y. & Liu, S. & Hoogenboom, G., 2014. "An evaluation of the statistical methods for testing the performance of crop models with observed data," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 81-89.
    16. Oron, Gideon & Campos, Claudia & Gillerman, Leonid & Salgot, Miquel, 1999. "Wastewater treatment, renovation and reuse for agricultural irrigation in small communities," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 223-234, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bao, Lei & Zhang, Saifeng & Liang, Xinyu & Wang, Peizhou & Guo, Yawen & Sun, Qinghao & Zhou, Jianbin & Chen, Zhujun, 2023. "Intelligent drip fertigation increases water and nutrient use efficiency of watermelon in greenhouse without compromising the yield," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    2. Callau-Beyer, Ana Claudia & Mburu, Martin Mungai & Weßler, Caspar-Friedrich & Amer, Nasser & Corbel, Anne-Laure & Wittnebel, Mareille & Böttcher, Jürgen & Bachmann, Jörg & Stützel, Hartmut, 2024. "Effect of high frequency subsurface drip fertigation on plant growth and agronomic nitrogen use efficiency of red cabbage," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. He, Qinsi & Li, Sien & Kang, Shaozhong & Yang, Hanbo & Qin, Shujing, 2018. "Simulation of water balance in a maize field under film-mulching drip irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 252-260.
    2. Azad, Nasrin & Behmanesh, Javad & Rezaverdinejad, Vahid & Abbasi, Fariborz & Navabian, Maryam, 2018. "Developing an optimization model in drip fertigation management to consider environmental issues and supply plant requirements," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 344-356.
    3. Phogat, V. & Skewes, M.A. & Cox, J.W. & Alam, J. & Grigson, G. & Šimůnek, J., 2013. "Evaluation of water movement and nitrate dynamics in a lysimeter planted with an orange tree," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 74-84.
    4. Liu, Lining & Wang, Tianshu & Wang, Lichun & Wu, Xun & Zuo, Qiang & Shi, Jianchu & Sheng, Jiandong & Jiang, Pingan & Chen, Quanjia & Ben-Gal, Alon, 2022. "Plant water deficit index-based irrigation under conditions of salinity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    5. Wu, Xun & Zhang, Wenjing & Liu, Wen & Zuo, Qiang & Shi, Jianchu & Yan, Xudong & Zhang, Hongfei & Xue, Xuzhang & Wang, Lichun & Zhang, Mo & Ben-Gal, Alon, 2017. "Root-weighted soil water status for plant water deficit index based irrigation scheduling," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 137-147.
    6. Saadat, Saeed & Homaee, Mehdi, 2015. "Modeling sorghum response to irrigation water salinity at early growth stage," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 119-124.
    7. Jalali, Vahidreza & Asadi Kapourchal, Safoora & Homaee, Mehdi, 2017. "Evaluating performance of macroscopic water uptake models at productive growth stages of durum wheat under saline conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 180(PA), pages 13-21.
    8. Wang, Zhen & Li, Jiusheng & Li, Yanfeng, 2014. "Simulation of nitrate leaching under varying drip system uniformities and precipitation patterns during the growing season of maize in the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 19-28.
    9. Minhas, P.S. & Ramos, Tiago B. & Ben-Gal, Alon & Pereira, Luis S., 2020. "Coping with salinity in irrigated agriculture: Crop evapotranspiration and water management issues," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    10. Nouri, Milad & Homaee, Mehdi & Bannayan, Mohammad & Hoogenboom, Gerrit, 2016. "Towards modeling soil texture-specific sensitivity of wheat yield and water balance to climatic changes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 248-263.
    11. Albasha, Rami & Mailhol, Jean-Claude & Cheviron, Bruno, 2015. "Compensatory uptake functions in empirical macroscopic root water uptake models – Experimental and numerical analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 22-39.
    12. Zahra Jafari & Sayed Hamid Matinkhah & Mohammad Reza Mosaddeghi, 2022. "Wetting Patterns in a Subsurface Irrigation System Using Reservoirs of Different Permeabilities: Experimental and HYDRUS-2D/3D Modeling," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(14), pages 5335-5352, November.
    13. Rashki, Paria & piri, halimeh & Khamari, Eisa, 2022. "Determining the production function and optimal irrigation depth of Roselle in deficit irrigation conditions and using potassium fertilizer," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    14. Barnard, J.H. & Bennie, A.T.P. & van Rensburg, L.D. & Preez, C.C. du, 2015. "SWAMP: A soil layer water supply model for simulating macroscopic crop water uptake under osmotic stress," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 150-163.
    15. Phogat, V. & Šimůnek, J. & Skewes, M.A. & Cox, J.W. & McCarthy, M.G., 2016. "Improving the estimation of evaporation by the FAO-56 dual crop coefficient approach under subsurface drip irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 189-200.
    16. Grecco, Katarina L. & Miranda, Jarbas H. de & Silveira, Laís K. & van Genuchten, Martinus Th., 2019. "HYDRUS-2D simulations of water and potassium movement in drip irrigated tropical soil container cultivated with sugarcane," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 334-347.
    17. Nouri, Milad & Homaee, Mehdi & Bannayan, Mohammad & Hoogenboom, Gerrit, 2017. "Towards shifting planting date as an adaptation practice for rainfed wheat response to climate change," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 108-119.
    18. Skaggs, Todd H. & van Genuchten, Martinus Th. & Shouse, Peter J. & Poss, James A., 2006. "Macroscopic approaches to root water uptake as a function of water and salinity stress," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(1-2), pages 140-149, November.
    19. Zhang, You-Liang & Feng, Shao-Yuan & Wang, Feng-Xin & Binley, Andrew, 2018. "Simulation of soil water flow and heat transport in drip irrigated potato field with raised beds and full plastic-film mulch in a semiarid area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 178-187.
    20. Rosa, R.D. & Ramos, T.B. & Pereira, L.S., 2016. "The dual Kc approach to assess maize and sweet sorghum transpiration and soil evaporation under saline conditions: Application of the SIMDualKc model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 77-94.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:270:y:2022:i:c:s0378377422002682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.