IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnljfs/v61y2015i11id46-2015-jfs.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A fixed count sampling estimator of stem density based on a survival function

Author

Listed:
  • S. Magnussen

    (Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Victoria BC, Canada)

Abstract

In fixed count sampling (FCS) a fixed number (k) of observations is made at n randomly selected sample locations. For estimation of stem density, the distance from a random sample location to the k nearest trees was measured. It is known that practical FCS estimators of stem density are biased. With the objective of reducing bias in FCS estimators of stem density, a new estimator derived from a survival function with distance acting as time was presented. To allow for spatial heterogeneity in stem density, the survival function includes shared frailty. Encouraging results with k = 6 in terms of bias, root mean squared error (RMSE), and coverage of nominal 95% confidence intervals were obtained in an extensive testing with simulated random sampling from 54 actual and four simulated spatial point patterns of tree locations. Sample sizes were 9, 15, and 30, with 1200 replications per setting. The performance across sites of the new FCS estimator was variable but almost paralleled that of a design-based estimator with fixed area plots. Users of the new FCS estimator can expect an absolute relative bias and a root mean squared error that are 1% greater than for sampling with fixed area plots holding an average of k trees. The chance of a smaller RMSE with the proposed estimator was estimated at 0.44.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Magnussen, 2015. "A fixed count sampling estimator of stem density based on a survival function," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(11), pages 485-495.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:61:y:2015:i:11:id:46-2015-jfs
    DOI: 10.17221/46/2015-JFS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/46/2015-JFS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/46/2015-JFS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/46/2015-JFS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberto G. Gutierrez, 2002. "Parametric frailty and shared frailty survival models," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 2(1), pages 22-44, February.
    2. Yi Li & Louise Ryan, 2002. "Modeling Spatial Survival Data Using Semiparametric Frailty Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(2), pages 287-297, June.
    3. Yi Li & Louise Ryan, 2004. "Survival Analysis With Heterogeneous Covariate Measurement Error," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 99, pages 724-735, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hormoz SOHRABI, 2018. "Adaptive k-tree sample plot for the estimation of stem density: An empirical approach," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(1), pages 17-24.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mihailo Radoman & Marcel C. Voia, 2015. "Youth Training Programs and Their Impact on Career and Spell Duration of Professional Soccer Players," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 29(2), pages 163-193, June.
    2. Elaine F. Frey, 2013. "Technology Diffusion and Environmental Regulation: The Adoption of Scrubbers by Coal-Fired Power Plants," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    3. Dirk Oberschachtsiek, 2014. "Waiting to start a business venture. Empirical evidence on the determinants," Working Paper Series in Economics 293, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.
    4. Bulan, Laarni & Mayer, Christopher & Somerville, C. Tsuriel, 2009. "Irreversible investment, real options, and competition: Evidence from real estate development," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 237-251, May.
    5. Paik, Jane & Ying, Zhiliang, 2012. "A composite likelihood approach for spatially correlated survival data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 209-216, January.
    6. Bessonova, Evguenia, 2023. "Firms’ efficiency, exits and government procurement contracts," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    7. Domenico Tabasso, 2011. "With or Without You: Hazard of Divorce and Intra-household Allocation of Time," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2011n07, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    8. K. Motarjem & M. Mohammadzadeh & A. Abyar, 2020. "Geostatistical survival model with Gaussian random effect," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 85-107, February.
    9. Akim Adekpedjou & Sophie Dabo‐Niang, 2021. "Semiparametric estimation with spatially correlated recurrent events," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(4), pages 1097-1126, December.
    10. Mehmet Ugur & Marco Vivarelli, 2021. "Innovation, firm survival and productivity: the state of the art," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 433-467, July.
    11. Glenn Hoetker & Anand Swaminathan & Will Mitchell, 2007. "Modularity and the Impact of Buyer-Supplier Relationships on the Survival of Suppliers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 178-191, February.
    12. Rezgar Zaki & Abbas Barabadi & Javad Barabady & Ali Nouri Qarahasanlou, 2022. "Observed and unobserved heterogeneity in failure data analysis," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(1), pages 194-207, February.
    13. Geršl, Adam & Jakubík, Petr & Kowalczyk, Dorota & Ongena, Steven & Peydró, José-Luis, 2015. "Monetary conditions and banks’ behaviour in the Czech Republic," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 26(3), pages 407-445.
    14. Love, James H. & Máñez, Juan A., 2019. "Persistence in exporting: Cumulative and punctuated learning effects," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 74-89.
    15. Yanlin Tang & Xinyuan Song & Grace Yun Yi, 2022. "Bayesian analysis under accelerated failure time models with error-prone time-to-event outcomes," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 139-168, January.
    16. Reza Barabadi & Mohammad Ataei & Reza Khalokakaie & Ali Nouri Qarahasanlou, 2021. "Spare-part management in a heterogeneous environment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-14, March.
    17. Ali Nouri Qarahasanlou & Ali Zamani & Abbas Barabadi & Mahdi Mokhberdoran, 2021. "Resilience Assessment: A Performance-Based Importance Measure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    18. Howdon, Daniel & Jones, Andrew M., 2015. "A discrete latent factor model for smoking, cancer and mortality," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 57-73.
    19. Taylor, Benjamin M. & Rowlingson, Barry S., 2017. "spatsurv: An R Package for Bayesian Inference with Spatial Survival Models," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 77(i04).
    20. Ugur, Mehmet & Trushin, Eshref & Solomon, Edna, 2016. "Inverted-U relationship between R&D intensity and survival: Evidence on scale and complementarity effects in UK data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 1474-1492.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:61:y:2015:i:11:id:46-2015-jfs. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.