IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/scjsta/v48y2021i1p349-370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feature screening for case‐cohort studies with failure time outcome

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Zhang
  • Haibo Zhou
  • Yanyan Liu
  • Jianwen Cai

Abstract

Case‐cohort design has been demonstrated to be an economical and efficient approach in large cohort studies when the measurement of some covariates on all individuals is expensive. Various methods have been proposed for case‐cohort data when the dimension of covariates is smaller than sample size. However, limited work has been done for high‐dimensional case‐cohort data which are frequently collected in large epidemiological studies. In this paper, we propose a variable screening method for ultrahigh‐dimensional case‐cohort data under the framework of proportional model, which allows the covariate dimension increases with sample size at exponential rate. Our procedure enjoys the sure screening property and the ranking consistency under some mild regularity conditions. We further extend this method to an iterative version to handle the scenarios where some covariates are jointly important but are marginally unrelated or weakly correlated to the response. The finite sample performance of the proposed procedure is evaluated via both simulation studies and an application to a real data from the breast cancer study.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Zhang & Haibo Zhou & Yanyan Liu & Jianwen Cai, 2021. "Feature screening for case‐cohort studies with failure time outcome," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(1), pages 349-370, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:48:y:2021:i:1:p:349-370
    DOI: 10.1111/sjos.12503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/sjos.12503
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/sjos.12503?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jing Zhang & Guosheng Yin & Yanyan Liu & Yuanshan Wu, 2018. "Censored cumulative residual independent screening for ultrahigh-dimensional survival data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 273-292, April.
    2. Wenliang Pan & Xueqin Wang & Weinan Xiao & Hongtu Zhu, 2019. "A Generic Sure Independence Screening Procedure," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(526), pages 928-937, April.
    3. Yuanshan Wu & Guosheng Yin, 2015. "Conditional quantile screening in ultrahigh-dimensional heterogeneous data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 102(1), pages 65-76.
    4. Zhao, Sihai Dave & Li, Yi, 2012. "Principled sure independence screening for Cox models with ultra-high-dimensional covariates," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 397-411.
    5. Thomas H. Scheike & Torben Martinussen, 2004. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Cox's Regression Model Under Case–Cohort Sampling," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 31(2), pages 283-293, June.
    6. Donglin Zeng & D. Y. Lin, 2014. "Efficient Estimation of Semiparametric Transformation Models for Two-Phase Cohort Studies," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(505), pages 371-383, March.
    7. Rui Song & Wenbin Lu & Shuangge Ma & X. Jessie Jeng, 2014. "Censored rank independence screening for high-dimensional survival data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 101(4), pages 799-814.
    8. Norman E. Breslow & Jon A. Wellner, 2007. "Weighted Likelihood for Semiparametric Models and Two‐phase Stratified Samples, with Application to Cox Regression," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 34(1), pages 86-102, March.
    9. Tibshirani Robert J., 2009. "Univariate Shrinkage in the Cox Model for High Dimensional Data," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, April.
    10. Fan, Jianqing & Feng, Yang & Song, Rui, 2011. "Nonparametric Independence Screening in Sparse Ultra-High-Dimensional Additive Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(494), pages 544-557.
    11. Michal Kulich & D.Y. Lin, 2004. "Improving the Efficiency of Relative-Risk Estimation in Case-Cohort Studies," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 99, pages 832-844, January.
    12. S. Kang & J. Cai, 2009. "Marginal hazards model for case-cohort studies with multiple disease outcomes," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 96(4), pages 887-901.
    13. Jianqing Fan & Jinchi Lv, 2008. "Sure independence screening for ultrahigh dimensional feature space," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(5), pages 849-911, November.
    14. Runze Li & Wei Zhong & Liping Zhu, 2012. "Feature Screening via Distance Correlation Learning," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(499), pages 1129-1139, September.
    15. Anders Gorst-Rasmussen & Thomas Scheike, 2013. "Independent screening for single-index hazard rate models with ultrahigh dimensional features," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 75(2), pages 217-246, March.
    16. Laura J. van 't Veer & Hongyue Dai & Marc J. van de Vijver & Yudong D. He & Augustinus A. M. Hart & Mao Mao & Hans L. Peterse & Karin van der Kooy & Matthew J. Marton & Anke T. Witteveen & George J. S, 2002. "Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer," Nature, Nature, vol. 415(6871), pages 530-536, January.
    17. Fan J. & Li R., 2001. "Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1348-1360, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jing Zhang & Haibo Zhou & Yanyan Liu & Jianwen Cai, 2021. "Conditional screening for ultrahigh-dimensional survival data in case-cohort studies," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 632-661, October.
    2. Jing Zhang & Yanyan Liu & Hengjian Cui, 2021. "Model-free feature screening via distance correlation for ultrahigh dimensional survival data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(6), pages 2711-2738, December.
    3. Zhong, Wei & Wang, Jiping & Chen, Xiaolin, 2021. "Censored mean variance sure independence screening for ultrahigh dimensional survival data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    4. Jing Zhang & Guosheng Yin & Yanyan Liu & Yuanshan Wu, 2018. "Censored cumulative residual independent screening for ultrahigh-dimensional survival data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 273-292, April.
    5. Liu, Yanyan & Zhang, Jing & Zhao, Xingqiu, 2018. "A new nonparametric screening method for ultrahigh-dimensional survival data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 74-85.
    6. Jing Zhang & Qihua Wang & Xuan Wang, 2022. "Surrogate-variable-based model-free feature screening for survival data under the general censoring mechanism," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 74(2), pages 379-397, April.
    7. Zhang, Jing & Liu, Yanyan & Wu, Yuanshan, 2017. "Correlation rank screening for ultrahigh-dimensional survival data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 121-132.
    8. Zhang, Shucong & Zhou, Yong, 2018. "Variable screening for ultrahigh dimensional heterogeneous data via conditional quantile correlations," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-13.
    9. Chen, Xiaolin & Chen, Xiaojing & Wang, Hong, 2018. "Robust feature screening for ultra-high dimensional right censored data via distance correlation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 118-138.
    10. Pan, Yingli, 2022. "Feature screening and FDR control with knockoff features for ultrahigh-dimensional right-censored data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    11. Jing Pan & Yuan Yu & Yong Zhou, 2018. "Nonparametric independence feature screening for ultrahigh-dimensional survival data," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 81(7), pages 821-847, October.
    12. Grace Y. Yi & Wenqing He & Raymond. J. Carroll, 2022. "Feature screening with large‐scale and high‐dimensional survival data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 894-907, September.
    13. Xuewei Cheng & Gang Li & Hong Wang, 2024. "The concordance filter: an adaptive model-free feature screening procedure," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 39(5), pages 2413-2436, July.
    14. Jinfeng Xu & Wai Keung Li & Zhiliang Ying, 2020. "Variable screening for survival data in the presence of heterogeneous censoring," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 47(4), pages 1171-1191, December.
    15. Jianglin Fang, 2021. "Feature screening for ultrahigh-dimensional survival data when failure indicators are missing at random," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 1141-1166, June.
    16. Zhang, Shen & Zhao, Peixin & Li, Gaorong & Xu, Wangli, 2019. "Nonparametric independence screening for ultra-high dimensional generalized varying coefficient models with longitudinal data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 37-52.
    17. Xiaolin Chen & Yi Liu & Qihua Wang, 2019. "Joint feature screening for ultra-high-dimensional sparse additive hazards model by the sparsity-restricted pseudo-score estimator," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 71(5), pages 1007-1031, October.
    18. Qu, Lianqiang & Wang, Xiaoyu & Sun, Liuquan, 2022. "Variable screening for varying coefficient models with ultrahigh-dimensional survival data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    19. Hyokyoung G. Hong & Xuerong Chen & David C. Christiani & Yi Li, 2018. "Integrated powered density: Screening ultrahigh dimensional covariates with survival outcomes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 421-429, June.
    20. He, Yong & Zhang, Liang & Ji, Jiadong & Zhang, Xinsheng, 2019. "Robust feature screening for elliptical copula regression model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 568-582.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:48:y:2021:i:1:p:349-370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0303-6898 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.