IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v415y2002i6871d10.1038_415530a.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Laura J. van 't Veer

    (Radiotherapy and Molecular Carcinogenesis and Center for Biomedical Genetics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute)

  • Hongyue Dai

    (Rosetta Inpharmatics)

  • Marc J. van de Vijver

    (Radiotherapy and Molecular Carcinogenesis and Center for Biomedical Genetics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute)

  • Yudong D. He

    (Rosetta Inpharmatics)

  • Augustinus A. M. Hart

    (Radiotherapy and Molecular Carcinogenesis and Center for Biomedical Genetics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute)

  • Mao Mao

    (Rosetta Inpharmatics)

  • Hans L. Peterse

    (Radiotherapy and Molecular Carcinogenesis and Center for Biomedical Genetics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute)

  • Karin van der Kooy

    (Radiotherapy and Molecular Carcinogenesis and Center for Biomedical Genetics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute)

  • Matthew J. Marton

    (Rosetta Inpharmatics)

  • Anke T. Witteveen

    (Radiotherapy and Molecular Carcinogenesis and Center for Biomedical Genetics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute)

  • George J. Schreiber

    (Rosetta Inpharmatics)

  • Ron M. Kerkhoven

    (Radiotherapy and Molecular Carcinogenesis and Center for Biomedical Genetics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute)

  • Chris Roberts

    (Rosetta Inpharmatics)

  • Peter S. Linsley

    (Rosetta Inpharmatics)

  • René Bernards

    (Radiotherapy and Molecular Carcinogenesis and Center for Biomedical Genetics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute)

  • Stephen H. Friend

    (Rosetta Inpharmatics)

Abstract

Breast cancer patients with the same stage of disease can have markedly different treatment responses and overall outcome. The strongest predictors for metastases (for example, lymph node status and histological grade) fail to classify accurately breast tumours according to their clinical behaviour1,2,3. Chemotherapy or hormonal therapy reduces the risk of distant metastases by approximately one-third; however, 70–80% of patients receiving this treatment would have survived without it4,5. None of the signatures of breast cancer gene expression reported to date6,7,8,9,10,11,12 allow for patient-tailored therapy strategies. Here we used DNA microarray analysis on primary breast tumours of 117 young patients, and applied supervised classification to identify a gene expression signature strongly predictive of a short interval to distant metastases (‘poor prognosis’ signature) in patients without tumour cells in local lymph nodes at diagnosis (lymph node negative). In addition, we established a signature that identifies tumours of BRCA1 carriers. The poor prognosis signature consists of genes regulating cell cycle, invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis. This gene expression profile will outperform all currently used clinical parameters in predicting disease outcome. Our findings provide a strategy to select patients who would benefit from adjuvant therapy.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura J. van 't Veer & Hongyue Dai & Marc J. van de Vijver & Yudong D. He & Augustinus A. M. Hart & Mao Mao & Hans L. Peterse & Karin van der Kooy & Matthew J. Marton & Anke T. Witteveen & George J. S, 2002. "Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer," Nature, Nature, vol. 415(6871), pages 530-536, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:415:y:2002:i:6871:d:10.1038_415530a
    DOI: 10.1038/415530a
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/415530a
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/415530a?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:415:y:2002:i:6871:d:10.1038_415530a. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.