IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v61y2010i5p978-993.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The adoption of university library Web site resources: A multigroup analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yong‐Mi Kim

Abstract

University libraries invest a massive amount of resources in digitizing information for the Web, yet there is growing concern that much of this information is being underutilized. The present study uses the technology acceptance model (TAM) to investigate university library website resources (ULWR) usage. We categorize users based on academic roles and then analyze them as subgroups in order to observe different adoption patterns across groups. A total of 299 usable responses was collected from four different universities and across three populations: undergraduate, master, and doctoral student/faculty groups. The findings show that different library users indeed access ULWR for different reasons, resulting in a need for tailored managerial efforts. Overall, the extended TAM explains undergraduate students' usage best; the explanatory power of the model is significantly lower for the doctoral student/faculty group. Some of the findings challenge results reported in TAM research in other fields. The unexpected findings may result from the application of the model to a different context. Detailed theoretical implications and managerial guidance are offered.

Suggested Citation

  • Yong‐Mi Kim, 2010. "The adoption of university library Web site resources: A multigroup analysis," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(5), pages 978-993, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:61:y:2010:i:5:p:978-993
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.21308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21308
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.21308?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pertti Vakkari, 2008. "Perceived influence of the use of electronic information resources on scholarly work and publication productivity," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 59(4), pages 602-612, February.
    2. Teo, Thompson S. H. & Lim, Vivien K. G. & Lai, Raye Y. C., 1999. "Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 25-37, February.
    3. Jon Hartwick & Henri Barki, 1994. "Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 440-465, April.
    4. Anastasios Tombros & Ian Ruthven & Joemon M. Jose, 2005. "How users assess Web pages for information seeking," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 56(4), pages 327-344, February.
    5. Viswanath Venkatesh, 2000. "Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 342-365, December.
    6. Barbara M. Wildemuth, 2004. "The effects of domain knowledge on search tactic formulation," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 55(3), pages 246-258, February.
    7. Yan Zhang, 2008. "Undergraduate students' mental models of the Web as an information retrieval system," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 59(13), pages 2087-2098, November.
    8. Kieran Mathieson, 1991. "Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 173-191, September.
    9. Jonathan W. Palmer, 2002. "Web Site Usability, Design, and Performance Metrics," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 151-167, June.
    10. Joseph W. Janes, 1994. "Other people's judgments: A comparison of users' and others' judgments of document relevance, topicality, and utility," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 45(3), pages 160-171, April.
    11. Yuelin Li, 2009. "Exploring the relationships between work task and search task in information search," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(2), pages 275-291, February.
    12. Karl Jöreskog, 1978. "Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(4), pages 443-477, December.
    13. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    14. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    15. M. Lynne Markus, 1994. "Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(4), pages 502-527, November.
    16. John H. Heinrichs & Kee‐Sook Lim & Jeen‐Su Lim & Melissa Allen Spangenberg, 2007. "Determining factors of academic library Web site usage," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(14), pages 2325-2334, December.
    17. Julian Lin & Hock Chuan Chan & Kwok Kee Wei, 2006. "Understanding competing application usage with the theory of planned behavior," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 57(10), pages 1338-1349, August.
    18. Park, Namkee & Roman, Raul & Lee, Seungyoon & Chung, Jae Eun, 2009. "User acceptance of a digital library system in developing countries: An application of the Technology Acceptance Model," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 196-209.
    19. Christine L. Borgman & Laura J. Smart & Kelli A. Millwood & Jason R. Finley & Leslie Champeny & Anne J. Gilliland & Gregory H. Leazer, 2005. "Comparing faculty information seeking in teaching and research: Implications for the design of digital libraries," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 56(6), pages 636-657, April.
    20. Charles T. Meadow & Jiabin Wang & Weijing Yuan, 1995. "A study of user performance and attitudes with information retrieval interfaces," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 46(7), pages 490-505, August.
    21. Yong‐Mi Kim, 2009. "Validation of psychometric research instruments: The case of information science," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(6), pages 1178-1191, June.
    22. Massimo Melucci, 2004. "Making digital libraries effective: Automatic generation of links for similarity search across hyper‐textbooks," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 55(5), pages 414-430, March.
    23. Oded Nov & Chen Ye, 2009. "Resistance to change and the adoption of digital libraries: An integrative model," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(8), pages 1702-1708, August.
    24. Oded Nov & Chen Ye, 2008. "Users' personality and perceived ease of use of digital libraries: The case for resistance to change," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 59(5), pages 845-851, March.
    25. Bernadette Szajna, 1996. "Empirical Evaluation of the Revised Technology Acceptance Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 85-92, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Enis Yakut & Ayse Gul Bayraktaroglu, 2021. "Consumer reactions to product recalls: the effects of intentionality, reputation, and public apology on purchase intentions," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(4), pages 527-564, May.
    2. Tugrul Daim & Nuri Basoglu & Banu Kargin & Kenny Phan, 2014. "Service Innovation Adoption: the Case of Value-Added Mobile Services," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 5(4), pages 784-802, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agarwal, Reeti & Rastogi, Sanjay & Mehrotra, Ankit, 2009. "Customers’ perspectives regarding e-banking in an emerging economy," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 340-351.
    2. Nedra, Bahri-Ammari & Hadhri, Walid & Mezrani, Mariem, 2019. "Determinants of customers' intentions to use hedonic networks: The case of Instagram," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 21-32.
    3. Huang, Tony Cheng-Kui & Liu, Chuang-Chun & Chang, Dong-Cheng, 2012. "An empirical investigation of factors influencing the adoption of data mining tools," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 257-270.
    4. Andrei OGREZEANU, 2015. "Models Of Technology Adoption: An Integrative Approach," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 5, pages 55-67, June.
    5. Viswanath Venkatesh, 2000. "Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 342-365, December.
    6. Gao, Tao (Tony) & Rohm, Andrew J. & Sultan, Fareena & Pagani, Margherita, 2013. "Consumers un-tethered: A three-market empirical study of consumers' mobile marketing acceptance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2536-2544.
    7. Johannes Putzke & Detlef Schoder & Kai Fischbach, 2010. "Adoption of Mass-Customized Newspapers: An Augmented Technology Acceptance Perspective," Journal of Media Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 143-164.
    8. Chen Wei, 2021. "The influence of Consumers’ Purchase intention on Smart Wearable Device: A study of Consumers in East China," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 5(8), pages 46-72.
    9. Donglin Han & Huiying (Cynthia) Hou & Hao Wu & Joseph H. K. Lai, 2021. "Modelling Tourists’ Acceptance of Hotel Experience-Enhancement Smart Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    10. Mariani, Marcello M. & Ek Styven, Maria & Teulon, Fréderic, 2021. "Explaining the intention to use digital personal data stores: An empirical study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    11. Song, Jinzhu & Drennan, Judy C. & Andrews, Lynda M., 2012. "Exploring regional differences in Chinese consumer acceptance of new mobile technology: A qualitative study," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 80-88.
    12. Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Banita Lal & Michael D. Williams & Marc Clement, 2017. "Citizens’ adoption of an electronic government system: towards a unified view," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 549-568, June.
    13. Wong Lai Soon & Bobby Chai Boon Hui & Wong Kee Luen, 2013. "Joining the New Band: Factors Triggering the Intentions of Malaysian College and University Students to Adopt 4G Broadband," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 5(2), pages 58-65.
    14. Kathrin Dudenhöffer, 2013. "Why electric vehicles failed," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 95-124, July.
    15. Hasnan Baber & N M Baki Billah, 2022. "Fintech and Islamic Banks - an integrative model approach to predict the intentions," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 24(2), pages 24-45, December.
    16. Yu-Jin Choi & Jin-Woo Park, 2020. "Investigating Factors Influencing the Behavioral Intention of Online Duty-Free Shop Users," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    17. Ainsworth, Jeremy & Ballantine, Paul W., 2017. "Consumers’ cognitive response to website change," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 56-66.
    18. Gartner, Johannes & Fink, Matthias & Maresch, Daniela, 2022. "The Role of Fear of Missing Out and Experience in the Formation of SME Decision Makers’ Intentions to Adopt New Manufacturing Technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    19. Pookulangara, Sanjukta & Koesler, Kristian, 2011. "Cultural influence on consumers' usage of social networks and its' impact on online purchase intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 348-354.
    20. Türker, Cansu & Altay, Burak Can & Okumuş, Abdullah, 2022. "Understanding user acceptance of QR code mobile payment systems in Turkey: An extended TAM," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:61:y:2010:i:5:p:978-993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.