IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamest/v46y1995i7p490-505.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A study of user performance and attitudes with information retrieval interfaces

Author

Listed:
  • Charles T. Meadow
  • Jiabin Wang
  • Weijing Yuan

Abstract

This article reports on a project undertaken to compare the behavior of two types of users with two types of information retrieval interfaces. The user types were search process specialists and subject matter domain specialists with no prior online database search experience. The interfaces were native DIALOG, which uses a procedural language, and OAK, a largely menu‐based, hence nonprocedural language interface communicating with DIALOG. Three types of data were recorded: logs automatically recorded by computer monitoring of all searches, results of structured interviews with subjects at the time of the searches, and results of focus group discussions after all project tasks were completed. The type of user was determined by a combination of prior training, objective in searching, and subject domain knowledge. Our results show that the type of interface does affect performance and that users adapt their behavior to interfaces differently. Different combinations of search experience and domain knowledge will lead to different behavior in use of an information retrieval system. Different kinds of users can best be served with different kinds of interfaces. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles T. Meadow & Jiabin Wang & Weijing Yuan, 1995. "A study of user performance and attitudes with information retrieval interfaces," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 46(7), pages 490-505, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:46:y:1995:i:7:p:490-505
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199508)46:73.0.CO;2-I
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199508)46:73.0.CO;2-I
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199508)46:73.0.CO;2-I?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yong‐Mi Kim, 2010. "The adoption of university library Web site resources: A multigroup analysis," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(5), pages 978-993, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:46:y:1995:i:7:p:490-505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.