IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/brjirl/v59y2021i2p474-502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constructing Inequalities: Tenure Trajectories of Immigrant Workers and Union Strategies in the Milan Construction Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Lorenzo Frangi
  • Tingting Zhang
  • Rupa Banerjee

Abstract

In this mixed‐methods study, we examined the employment trajectories of immigrant employees in the construction sector in Milan and the role of unions in promoting their labour market inclusion. Drawing on a unique dataset of 417,004 contracts representing more than 166,000 construction workers over a 12‐year period (2000–2011), we employed Growth Curve Modelling (GCM) to explore national group differences in contract, firm and sector tenure trajectories. We found Egyptian and Romanian workers suffer from lowest tenure levels. To investigate these results, we conducted 15 interviews with key informants. Results suggested firm characteristics and position along the production process (mono‐task), pervasive immigrant hiring queues (mono‐national) and union's use of class strategies are interlocking forces that shape deep labour market segregation. We recommend unions develop and apply tailored ethnic strategies to empower highly segregated immigrant groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorenzo Frangi & Tingting Zhang & Rupa Banerjee, 2021. "Constructing Inequalities: Tenure Trajectories of Immigrant Workers and Union Strategies in the Milan Construction Sector," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 59(2), pages 474-502, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:59:y:2021:i:2:p:474-502
    DOI: 10.1111/bjir.12567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12567
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/bjir.12567?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Justin Byrne & Linda Clarke & Marc Van Der Meer, 2005. "Gender and ethnic minority exclusion from skilled occupations in construction: a Western European comparison," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(10), pages 1025-1034.
    2. Nathan Lillie, 2012. "Subcontracting, Posted Migrants and Labour Market Segmentation in Finland," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 50(1), pages 148-167, March.
    3. Graham J. Ive & Stephen L. Gruneberg, 2000. "The Economics of the Modern Construction Sector," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-51091-3.
    4. Patrick McGovern, 2007. "Immigration, Labour Markets and Employment Relations: Problems and Prospects," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 45(2), pages 217-235, June.
    5. Kerry London & Russell Kenley, 2001. "An industrial organization economic supply chain approach for the construction industry: a review," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(8), pages 777-788.
    6. Christelle Havard & Brigitte Rorive & André Sobczak, 2009. "Client, employer and employee: Mapping a complex triangulation," Post-Print hal-00771101, HAL.
    7. repec:bla:jecsur:v:12:y:1998:i:1:p:63-101 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Grimshaw, Damian & Rubery, Jill, 1998. "Integrating the Internal and External Labour Markets," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 22(2), pages 199-220, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valeria Pulignano & Guglielmo Meardi & Nadja Doerflinger, 2015. "Trade unions and labour market dualisation: a comparison of policies and attitudes towards agency and migrant workers in Germany and Belgium," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 29(5), pages 808-825, October.
    2. Robert MacKenzie & Chris Forde, 2009. "The rhetoric of the `good worker' versus the realities of employers' use and the experiences of migrant workers," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 23(1), pages 142-159, March.
    3. Damian Raess & Brian Burgoon, 2015. "Flexible Work and Immigration in Europe," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 53(1), pages 94-111, March.
    4. Chris F. Wright, 2017. "Employer Organizations and Labour Immigration Policy in Australia and the United Kingdom: The Power of Political Salience and Social Institutional Legacies," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 55(2), pages 347-371, June.
    5. Dawson Chris & Veliziotis Michail & Hopkins Benjamin, 2014. "Assimilation of the migrant work ethic," Working Papers 20141407, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    6. Jenny Rodriguez & Evangelina Holvino & Joyce K. Fletcher & Stella M. Nkomo & Tessa Wright, 2016. "Women's Experience of Workplace Interactions in Male-Dominated Work: The Intersections of Gender, Sexuality and Occupational Group," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 348-362, May.
    7. Jens Arnholtz & Nana Wesley Hansen, 2013. "Labour market specific institutions and the working conditions of labour migrants: The case of Polish migrant labour in the Danish labour market," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 34(3), pages 401-422, August.
    8. Mikolaj Stanek & Alberto Veira, 2012. "Ethnic niching in a segmented labour market: Evidence from Spain," Migration Letters, Migration Letters, vol. 9(3), pages 249-262, September.
    9. Dimitria Groutsis & Joana Vassilopoulou & Olivia Kyriakidou & Mustafa F Özbilgin, 2020. "The ‘New’ Migration for Work Phenomenon: The Pursuit of Emancipation and Recognition in the Context of Work," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(5), pages 864-882, October.
    10. Virginie Xhauflair & Benjamin Huybrechts & François Pichault, 2018. "How Can New Players Establish Themselves in Highly Institutionalized Labour Markets? A Belgian Case Study in the Area of Project†Based Work," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 56(2), pages 370-394, June.
    11. Ines Wagner, 2015. "EU posted work and transnational action in the German meat industry," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 21(2), pages 201-213, May.
    12. Chloe Tarrabain & Robyn Thomas, 2024. "The Dynamics of Control of Migrant Agency Workers: Over-Recruitment, ‘The Bitchlist’ and the Enterprising-Self," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(1), pages 27-43, February.
    13. Maarten Vendrik & Christiane Schwieren, 2010. "Identification, screening and stereotyping in labour market discrimination," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 99(2), pages 141-171, March.
    14. Bidabadi Zahra Toroghi & Hosseinalipour Mujtaba & Hamidizadeh Mohammad Reza & Mohebifar Amirhossein, 2016. "Supply chain collaboration within the Iranian construction industry," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 1437-1445, December.
    15. Gabriella Alberti & Davide Però, 2018. "Migrating Industrial Relations: Migrant Workers’ Initiative Within and Outside Trade Unions," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 56(4), pages 693-715, December.
    16. Héloïse Petit, 2004. "Cambridge contre Cambridge : Deux approches segmentationnistes face au tournant des années 1980," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-00801427, HAL.
    17. Nathan Lillie, 2022. "Round Table. Nordic unions and the European Minimum Wage Directive," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 28(4), pages 499-504, November.
    18. Siegmann, K.A. & Ivosevic, P. & Visser, O., 2021. "Working like machines: Exploring effects of technological change on migrant labour in Dutch horticulture," ISS Working Papers - General Series 691, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    19. Pichault, Francois & Fatien Diochon, Pauline & Nizet, Jean, 2020. "Autonomy of independent professionals: A political process perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 623-633.
    20. Xosé H. Vázquez, 2004. "Allocating Decision Rights on the Shop Floor: A Perspective from Transaction Cost Economics and Organization Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 463-480, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:59:y:2021:i:2:p:474-502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.