IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aib/ibtjbs/v13y2017i1p25-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact Of Generational Differences On Employees’ Preferences For Engagement - Enablers And Drivers At Feroze1888 Mills Ltd

Author

Listed:
  • Jamila Majid

    (Jamila Majid is an MBA Scholar at Bahria University & HR Generalist at Feroze1888)

  • Sayma Zia

    (Sayma Zia is Assistant Professor and PhD Scholar at Bahria University Karachi)

  • Bashir Ahmad

    (Bashir Ahmad is Associate Professor at Bahria University Karachi)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to identify the impact of generational differences on employee preferences for engagement enablers and drivers at feroze1888 mills ltd.To conduct this research, Employee Engagement Drivers have been identified through the research paper named as ‘The Drivers of Employee Engagement a diagnostic model which was presented by Institute of Employment Studies in 2003, while the Employee Engagement Enablers have been extracted from the research paper ‘Engaging for Success Enhancing performance through employee engagement’ published in 2009 by MacLeod and Clarke.The identified variables in terms of Enablers and Drivers have then been evaluated with respect to preferences of three generations for them which includes Baby Boomers, Gen X and Gen Y.Stratified Random Sampling has been used for this research resulting in a total sample size of 208 respondents comprising of 3 strata groups based on the 3 generations.For data Integration and analysis, oneway ANOVA has been used to find out the results in categorical form for the purpose of creating a comparison between the three groups.Having some of its hypothesis rejected while majority getting excepted, the research has concluded that ‘yes there do exist some difference amongst the 3 generations in their preferences for the Enablers and Drivers’.This research can be useful for organizations who consider the Engagement of each of their employees equally important regardless of the age bracket to which they belong.This research can provide them an insight about which areas of Employee Engagement are to be kept in focus to engage their young, middle aged and senior employees

Suggested Citation

  • Jamila Majid & Sayma Zia & Bashir Ahmad, 2017. "Impact Of Generational Differences On Employees’ Preferences For Engagement - Enablers And Drivers At Feroze1888 Mills Ltd," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 13(1), pages 25-44.
    • Handle: RePEc:aib:ibtjbs:v:13:y:2017:i:1:p:25-44
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.46745/ilma.ibtjbs.2017.131.3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ibtjbs.ilmauniversity.edu.pk/journal/jbs/13.1/3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.46745/ilma.ibtjbs.2017.131.3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bayo-Moriones, Alberto & Galdon-Sanchez, Jose Enrique & Martinez-de-Morentin, Sara, 2011. "Performance Appraisal: Dimensions and Determinants," IZA Discussion Papers 5623, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Jurjen J.A. Kamphorst & Otto H. Swank, 2018. "The role of performance appraisals in motivating employees," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 251-269, June.
    3. Dorothea Wahyu Ariani, 2013. "The Relationship between Employee Engagement, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Counterproductive Work Behavior," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(2), pages 46-56, March.
    4. Brikend AZIRI, 2011. "Job Satisfaction, A Literature Review," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 3(4), pages 77-86, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jamila Majid & Sayma Zia & Bashir Ahmad, 2017. "Impact Of Generational Differences On Employees’ Preferences For Engagement - Enablers And Drivers At Feroze1888 Mills Ltd," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 13(1), pages 13-13.
    2. Rana Khaled Abu Khalaf & Hazar Y.Hmoud & Bader Obeidat, 2019. "Reviewing the Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction on the Effect of Employee Engagement on Organizational Performance," Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS), , vol. 8(1), pages 7-23, January.
    3. repec:jso:coejss:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:7.23 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Hyo Sun Jung & Kyung Hwa Seo & Hye Hyun Yoon, 2020. "The Importance of Leader Integrity on Family Restaurant Employees’ Engagement and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Exploring Sustainability of Employees’ Generational Differences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-12, March.
    5. Ms. Ginu George & Dr. Binoy Joseph, 2014. "A Study on Employees’ Engagement Level in Travel Organisations with Reference to Karnataka," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 5(3), pages 08-15, September.
    6. Ling Tan & Yongli Wang & Hailing Lu, 2022. "Leader Humor Extends beyond Work: how and when Followers Have Better Family Lives," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(1), pages 351-374, February.
    7. Alaa Ibrahim Lary & Rosmini Omar, 2021. "A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Role of Employer Branding, Person-Organization Fit and Employee Engagement in Shaping Organizational Citizenship Behavior," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 12(2), pages 172-181, December.
    8. Rana Muhammad Shahid Yaqub & Nazim Hussain & Shanayyara Mahmood & Zahra Farooq, 2021. "Linking Compensation, Employee Engagement, Employee Loyalty And Organizational Performance: The Mediating Role Of Organization Commitment," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 10(3), pages 17-32.
    9. Delfgaauw, Josse & Souverijn, Michiel, 2016. "Biased supervision," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 107-125.
    10. Stephan HUMPERT, 2016. "What Workers Want: Job Satisfaction In The U.S," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 8(1), pages 39-45, March.
    11. repec:bfv:journl:015 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Christian Maier & Sven Laumer & Tim Weitzel, 2022. "A Dark Side of Telework: A Social Comparison-Based Study from the Perspective of Office Workers," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(6), pages 793-811, December.
    13. Giulia Casu & Marco Giovanni Mariani & Rita Chiesa & Dina Guglielmi & Paola Gremigni, 2021. "The Role of Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Gender between Job Satisfaction and Task Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-15, September.
    14. Sheharbano Tariq & Syed Musa Kazim & Maria Idress & Dr. Ali Raza, 2022. "Impact of Harassment on Work Basic Need Satisfaction of Women Working in Media Houses," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 8(4), pages 35-39, December.
    15. Tilahun Kidane Diko & Shabnam Saxena, 2023. "Antecedents and outcome of employee engagement: Empirical study of Ethiopian public higher education institutions," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(8), pages 1-30, August.
    16. Bakanauskienė Irena & Zagurskytė Gustė, 2021. "Happiness at Work: Evidence of Young People’s Expectations from Lithuania," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 85(1), pages 1-12, June.
    17. Asghar Ali & Iqbal Ahmad & M. Anees-ul-Husnain Shah, 2016. "Comparing Perceptions of Public versus Government School Teachers towards Job Satisfaction at District Malakand," Global Regional Review, Humanity Only, vol. 1(1), pages 285-298, June.
    18. Nobuki Hashiguchi & Jianfei Cao & Yeongjoo Lim & Yasushi Kubota & Shigeo Kitahara & Shuichi Ishida & Kota Kodama, 2020. "The Effects of Psychological Factors on Perceptions of Productivity in Construction Sites in Japan by Worker Age," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Elena-Mădălina Vătămănescu & Elena Dinu & Mădălina-Elena Stratone & Roxana-Maria Stăneiu & Florina Vintilă, 2022. "Adding Knowledge to Virtual Teams in the New Normal: From Leader-Team Communication towards the Satisfaction with Teamwork," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.
    20. Baciu Andreea Daniela & Cernega DUmitrița Adelina & Mocanu Cătălina Anca & Rus Mihaela, 2023. "This study focuses on evaluating employees ' job satisfaction and the degree of fairness within organizations. Abstract: The main aim is to examine the relationship between these crucial elements of t," BlackSea Journal of Psychology, Ovidius University of Constanta, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, vol. 14(4), pages 80-88, November.
    21. Ayman Alshaabani & Farheen Naz & Róbert Magda & Ildikó Rudnák, 2021. "Impact of Perceived Organizational Support on OCB in the Time of COVID-19 Pandemic in Hungary: Employee Engagement and Affective Commitment as Mediators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-21, July.
    22. Behl, Abhishek & Jayawardena, Nirma & Ishizaka, Alessio & Gupta, Manish & Shankar, Amit, 2022. "Gamification and gigification: A multidimensional theoretical approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1378-1393.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aib:ibtjbs:v:13:y:2017:i:1:p:25-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Syed Kashif Rafi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmilmpk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.