IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/341557.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International experience in applying and developing the economic mechanism of public administration of food security

Author

Listed:
  • Stetsiv, Iryna

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of this article is to develop and test the methodological foundations for researching the international experience in the application and development of the economic mechanism of public administration of food security, to identify typical patterns of public administration in developed countries, with the purpose of further implementing the acquired knowledge in Ukraine. Methodology / approach. In this study, the following methods were used: theoretical generalization, abstract-logical and formalisation (systematisation of theoretical positions regarding methodological foundations of the study), financial-economic and statistical analysis (identification of trends in key indicators changes), correlation and regression analysis (determining the dependence of the global food security index on the development indicator of the economic mechanism); abstract-logical and graphical (visual representation of results). An original research methodology for the international experience in the application and development of the economic mechanism of public administration of food security has been developed. The empirical part of the study is conducted using data from countries in Europe, America, and Asia for the period from 1836–2022. Results. The results of the conducted analysis demonstrate a gradual change of the development of the economic mechanism of state management of food security across all components of public administration. The determined absolute indicator of the development of the economic mechanism of public administration of food security proves Finland’s leading positions, amounting to 108.35, which is a benchmark value. The results of the correlation and regression analysis indicate a close connection between the development indicator of the economic mechanism of state management of food security and the global food security index across its components, proving the key role of the economic mechanism in state management. The constructed model of the spiral dynamics of the development of the economic mechanism of state management of food security is characterised by cyclical movement from the domestic needs of countries to the global scales of the international level. Originality / scientific novelty. For the first time, a methodology for researching the international experience in the application and development of the economic mechanism of public administration of food security has been proposed, which, unlike existing ones, allows evaluating the implementation of certain functions of individual state management bodies, the development of regulations and directions of state policy aimed at ensuring food security in terms of its components. Practical value / implications. The main results of the study can be used for further evaluation of other countries to determine their positions on the world stage and the implementation of best practices in state management, as well as for researching the economic mechanism of state management in other areas of social life.

Suggested Citation

  • Stetsiv, Iryna, 2024. "International experience in applying and developing the economic mechanism of public administration of food security," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 10(01), March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:341557
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.341557
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/341557/files/5_Stetsiv_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.341557?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jayson Beckman & Amanda M. Countryman, 2021. "The Importance of Agriculture in the Economy: Impacts from COVID‐19," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(5), pages 1595-1611, October.
    2. Patricia Rojas & Helgi Jung-Cook & Elizabeth Ruiz-Sánchez & Irma Susana Rojas-Tomé & Carolina Rojas & Arely M. López-Ramírez & Aldo Arturo Reséndiz-Albor, 2022. "Historical Aspects of Herbal Use and Comparison of Current Regulations of Herbal Products between Mexico, Canada and the United States of America," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Margaret Chitiga & Martin Henseler & Ramos Emmanuel Mabugu & Hélène Maisonnave, 2022. "How COVID-19 Pandemic Worsens the Economic Situation of Women in South Africa," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(3), pages 1627-1644, June.
    4. B. Lahcen & J. Brusselaers & K. Vrancken & Y. Dams & C. Silva Paes & J. Eyckmans & S. Rousseau, 2020. "Green Recovery Policies for the COVID-19 Crisis: Modelling the Impact on the Economy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(4), pages 731-750, August.
    5. Stetsiv, Iryna, 2022. "Public administration of food security: conceptual basis and rational approaches," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(4), December.
    6. Cui, Qi & He, Ling & Liu, Yu & Zheng, Yanting & Wei, Wei & Yang, Bo & Zhou, Meifang, 2021. "The impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on China’s transport sectors based on the CGE model coupled with a decomposition analysis approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 103-115.
    7. Michiel van Dijk & Gerdien Meijerink, 2014. "A review of global food security scenario and assessment studies: results, gaps and research priorities," FOODSECURE Working papers 20, LEI Wageningen UR.
    8. Sviatoslav Kniaz & Nazar Podolchak & Yurii Dziurakh & Veronika Karkovska & Anatolii Kucher, 2023. "Development of Government Regulation on Investment Activities in Agriculture of Ukraine," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 136-150.
    9. Nataliia Patyka & Olena Gryschenko & Anatolii Kucher & Maria Hełdak & Beata Raszka, 2021. "Assessment of the Degree of Factors Impact on Employment in Ukraine’s Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    10. Duan, Hongbo & Bao, Qin & Tian, Kailan & Wang, Shouyang & Yang, Cuihong & Cai, Zongwu, 2021. "The hit of the novel coronavirus outbreak to China's economy," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Yawen & Cui, Qi & Liu, Yu & Zhang, Jinzhu & Zhou, Meifang & Ali, Tariq & Yang, Lingyu & Feng, Kuishuang & Hubacek, Klaus & Li, Xinbei, 2021. "Countermeasures against economic crisis from COVID-19 pandemic in China: An analysis of effectiveness and trade-offs," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 482-495.
    2. Liu, Li-Jing & Yao, Yun-Fei & Liang, Qiao-Mei & Qian, Xiang-Yan & Xu, Chun-Lei & Wei, Si-Yi & Creutzig, Felix & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2021. "Combining economic recovery with climate change mitigation: A global evaluation of financial instruments," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 438-453.
    3. Feng, Chun-Chiang & Chang, Kuei-Feng & Lin, Jin-Xu & Lee, Tsung-Chen & Lin, Shih-Mo, 2022. "Toward green transition in the post Paris Agreement era: The case of Taiwan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    4. Shehabi, Manal, 2022. "Modeling long-term impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and oil price declines on Gulf oil economies," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    5. Jiang, Shiqi & Lin, Xinyue & Qi, Lingli & Zhang, Yongqiang & Sharp, Basil, 2022. "The macro-economic and CO2 emissions impacts of COVID-19 and recovery policies in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 981-996.
    6. Xinyue Lin & Lingli Qi & Haoran Pan & Basil Sharp, 2022. "COVID-19 Pandemic, Technological Progress and Food Security Based on a Dynamic CGE Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Beckman, Jayson & Gale, Fred & Morgan, Stephen & Sabala, Ethan & Ufer, Danielle & Valcu-Lisman, Adriana & Zeng, Wendy & Arita, Shawn, 2022. "China's Import Potential for Beef, Corn, Pork, and Wheat," Amber Waves:The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 2020(Economic ), August.
    8. Hugo S. Gonçalves & Sérgio Moro, 2023. "On the economic impacts of COVID‐19: A text mining literature analysis," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 375-394, February.
    9. Yang, Senyan & Ning, Lianju & Jiang, Tingfeng & He, Yingqi, 2021. "Dynamic impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on the regional express logistics: Evidence from China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 111-124.
    10. Dogan, Eyup & Majeed, Muhammad Tariq & Luni, Tania, 2022. "Analyzing the nexus of COVID-19 and natural resources and commodities: Evidence from time-varying causality," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    11. Yanguas Parra, Paola & Hauenstein, Christian & Oei, Pao-Yu, 2021. "The death valley of coal – Modelling COVID-19 recovery scenarios for steam coal markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    12. Robert Mroczek & Oksana Kiforenko & Igor Olech, 2024. "The Investments of the European Union Member-States into the Ukrainian Agricultural Sector and their Impact on its Competitiveness," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 797-809.
    13. Zou, Chen & Huang, Yongchun & Ye, Zi & Pan, Anqi, 2023. "The effect of major public emergencies on technology-based SMEs: Survival crisis and relief paths," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PA).
    14. Koasidis, Konstantinos & Nikas, Alexandros & Van de Ven, Dirk-Jan & Xexakis, Georgios & Forouli, Aikaterini & Mittal, Shivika & Gambhir, Ajay & Koutsellis, Themistoklis & Doukas, Haris, 2022. "Towards a green recovery in the EU: Aligning further emissions reductions with short- and long-term energy-sector employment gains," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    15. Rūta Banelienė, 2022. "Sustainable Economic Growth in the European Union under COVID-19 Conditions," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 16(1), March.
    16. Elif Bozkaya & Levent Eriskin & Mumtaz Karatas, 2023. "Data analytics during pandemics: a transportation and location planning perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(1), pages 193-244, September.
    17. Gao, Yixuan & Malone, Trey & Schaefer, K. Aleks & Myers, Robert J., 2023. "Disentangling Short-Run COVID-19 Price Impact Pathways in the US Corn Market," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 48(2), May.
    18. Li, Tao & Rong, Lili & Zhang, Anming, 2021. "Assessing regional risk of COVID-19 infection from Wuhan via high-speed rail," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 226-238.
    19. Liu, Yunqiang & Liu, Sha & Ye, Deping & Tang, Hong & Wang, Fang, 2022. "Dynamic impact of negative public sentiment on agricultural product prices during COVID-19," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    20. Vaiknoras, Kate & Hahn, William & Padilla, Samantha & Valcu-Lisman, Adriana & Grossen, Grace, 2022. "COVID-19 Working Paper: COVID-19 and the U.S. Meat and Poultry Supply Chains," Administrative Publications 327338, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Food Security and Poverty;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:341557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.