IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/icmbdj/v1y2017i1p41-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Advantages Related to a Municipality – the Experts View

Author

Listed:
  • Yana Balashova-Kostadinova

    (University of Economics - Varna)

Abstract

In recent years competitiveness has intensified immensely not only between businesses but also amongst territories. This is on large part due to globalization, development of communication technologies as well as the easy opportunities for traveling and exploring. Territories nowadays have to look for ways they can improve their competitiveness not only on the global markets or related to their attractiveness to external audiences but also related to local residents’ and business’s attitude towards the territory itself. One way to increase the competitiveness of a territory is to use its advantages in order to distinguish it from other territories with similar characteristics. In classical economics theory two types of advantages are described comparative advantages and absolute advantages. Absolute advantages can be used to build competitiveness but not all territories have absolute advantages and also absolute advantages are not always enough to ensure sustainability over time. Territories have to also look for and explore the options for developing their comparative advantages. Comparative advantages are derived from the opportunity for exchange which leads to increased productivity and consumption. In other words the value of the comparative advantage is assessed based on the advantages the competitor has. Applied towards territories comparative advantages could be found in specific features pertaining to the territory like certain climate conditions, a given set of natural resources, the available sightseeing sights, traditional culture, local customs and traditions, certain locally produced food and drinks and so on - all of which give the opportunity to build advantages over competitors. In the current paper the experts’ views on identifying the potential comparative advantages of Varna municipality will be put up for discussion.

Suggested Citation

  • Yana Balashova-Kostadinova, 2017. "Comparative Advantages Related to a Municipality – the Experts View," International Conference on Marketing and Business Development Journal, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 41-52, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:icmbdj:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:41-52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.mbd.ase.ro/RePEc/aes/icmbdj/2017/ICMBD_V1_2017_9.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Moise, 2015. "Events Marketing 4-D Research," International Conference on Marketing and Business Development Journal, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 227-232, July.
    2. Paul C. Cheshire, 2003. "Territorial Competition: Lessons for (Innovation) Policy," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Johannes Bröcker & Dirk Dohse & Rüdiger Soltwedel (ed.), Innovation Clusters and Interregional Competition, chapter 16, pages 331-346, Springer.
    3. Daniela Gracan & Marina Barkidija, 2015. "Green Business for Green Meetings (Case Study: Opatija Kongress Hotels)," International Conference on Marketing and Business Development Journal, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 274-280, July.
    4. Nuvolati, Giampaolo, 2003. "Resident and Non-resident Populations: Quality of Life, Mobility, and Time Policies," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 33(2), pages 1-17.
    5. Helmut Birnleitner, 2014. "Attractiveness of Countries for Foreign Direct Investments from the Macro-Economic Perspective," Proceedings of FIKUSZ '14, in: Pál Michelberger (ed.),Proceedings of FIKUSZ '14, pages 29-40, Óbuda University, Keleti Faculty of Business and Management.
    6. Alexandra Zbuchea, 2014. "Territorial Marketing Based On Cultural Heritage," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(2), pages 135-151, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yana BALASHOVA-KOSTADINOVA, 2018. "Comparative Advantages of Territories – the Residents’ View," Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 55-68, November.
    2. Fancello, Giovanna & Tsoukiàs, Alexis, 2021. "Learning urban capabilities from behaviours. A focus on visitors values for urban planning," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    3. Paola Panuccio, 2019. "Smart Planning: From City to Territorial System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Fabio Gaetano Santeramo & Roberto Manno & Marco Tappi & Emilia Lamonaca, 2022. "Trademarks and Territorial Marketing: Retrospective and Prospective Analyses of the trademark Prodotti di Qualità," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 24(1), pages 1-37.
    5. Neutens, Tijs & Delafontaine, Matthias & Schwanen, Tim & Weghe, Nico Van de, 2012. "The relationship between opening hours and accessibility of public service delivery," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 128-140.
    6. Brambert Patryk & Kiniorska Iwona, 2018. "Changes in the Standard of Living in Rural Population of Poland in the Period of the Eu Membership," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 10(2), pages 263-279, June.
    7. Julie Vallée, 2022. "Une lecture critique des politiques territorialement sélectives et de leur géographie," Post-Print halshs-03801117, HAL.
    8. Gavrysh Oleg & Kukharuk Anna & Gavrysh Iuliia, 2022. "Innovative Determinants of the Investment Attractiveness of a Country: The Case of Ukraine," Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, Sciendo, vol. 44(2), pages 21-40, June.
    9. Andranik Muradyan, 2018. "Assessment of the Attractiveness of Foreign Markets– A Case Study. Comparison of Armenia and Poland," Journal of Marketing and Consumer Behaviour in Emerging Markets, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 2(8), pages 4-20.
    10. Lucas Figal Garone & Alessandro Maffioli & Joao Negri & Cesar Rodriguez & Gonzalo Vázquez-Baré, 2015. "Cluster development policy, SME’s performance, and spillovers: evidence from Brazil," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 925-948, April.
    11. Małgorzata Zdon-Korzeniowska & Monika Noviello, 2019. "The Wooden Architecture Route as an Example of a Regional Tourism Product in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-13, September.
    12. Georgeta-Madalina MEGHISAN, 2015. "Cultural Influences On Pre-Pay Mobile Telecommunications Services Users," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(1), pages 181-187, May.
    13. Vincent Mabillard & Renaud Vuignier, 2017. "The less transparent, the more attractive? A critical perspective on transparency and place branding," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(4), pages 348-359, November.
    14. MM. Andranik Muradyan, 2020. "Procedure for Assessing the Investment Attractivenessof Foreign Markets.Comparative Analysis of Former USSR Countries," Journal of Marketing and Consumer Behaviour in Emerging Markets, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 1(10), pages 24-48.
    15. Bartkowiak Piotr & Krzakiewicz Marianna, 2017. "Shaping of the intramunicipal relations in the contemporary local government on the city of Poznan example," Management, Sciendo, vol. 22(1), pages 194-207, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    comparative advantage; competitiveness; territory.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:icmbdj:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:41-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucian Onisor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.