IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mpifgw/117.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Kooperation oder Konfrontation? Der Aufstieg Chinas in der globalen politischen Ökonomie

Author

Listed:
  • ten Brink, Tobias

Abstract

Welche Folgen zeitigt der rasante Aufstieg Chinas? Im Anschluss an Erkenntnisse der Chinaforschung und politökonomischer Ansätze wird die Volksrepublik China als eine Variante der nachholenden (staats-)kapitalistischen Entwicklung analysiert, die an einer wirtschaftlichen und geopolitischen Aufwertung interessiert ist. Dabei verkörpert die inter- und transnationale Einbettung des neuen chinesischen Kapitalismus in ein instabiles Weltsystem trotz des Bemühens der Staatsführung um eine verantwortungsvolle Großmachtpolitik einen spannungsreichen Prozess. Zwar bleibt die chinesische Volkswirtschaft abhängig von den alten Zentren des globalen Kapitalismus. Daraus folgt jedoch nicht umstandslos eine reibungslose Zusammenarbeit. Im Gegenteil weisen aktuelle Währungsdispute mit den USA im Zuge des globalen Wirtschaftseinbruchs auf politisch vermittelte Standortkonflikte hin. Perspektiven einer konfliktarmen Integration Chinas müssen daher relativiert werden - wie zusätzlich die Führungsrolle des Landes im ostasiatischen Regionalisierungsprozess illustriert -, ohne voreilige Schlussfolgerungen hinsichtlich militärischer Zusammenstöße und eines Übergangs zu einer neuen globalen chinesischen Hegemonie zu übernehmen. Abgezielt wird darauf, die Vorteile einer politökonomischen Betrachtungsweise bei der Beantwortung einer Frage herauszustellen, die üblicherweise in einer Perspektive der Internationalen Beziehungen, das heißt fokussiert auf zwischenstaatliche Beziehungen, behandelt wird.

Suggested Citation

  • ten Brink, Tobias, 2011. "Kooperation oder Konfrontation? Der Aufstieg Chinas in der globalen politischen Ökonomie," MPIfG Working Paper 11/7, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgw:117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/52725/1/675831628.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amable, Bruno, 2003. "The Diversity of Modern Capitalism," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199261147.
    2. Streeck, Wolfgang, 2010. "E pluribus unum? Varieties and commonalities of capitalism," MPIfG Discussion Paper 10/12, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    3. Xudong Gao & Yajun Wu & Mingfang Li, 2010. "Managing complexity in the process of transforming new start-ups into well established firms in the Chinese economy context," International Journal of Business and Systems Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(5/6), pages 577-595.
    4. Deutschmann, Christoph, 2009. "Soziologie kapitalistischer Dynamik," MPIfG Working Paper 09/5, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    5. Barry Naughton, 2007. "The Chinese Economy: Transitions and Growth," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262640643, April.
    6. H. Yeung, 2006. "Change and Continuity in Southeast Asian Ethnic Chinese Business," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 229-254, September.
    7. Peter Nolan, 2010. "America and the Crossroads of Capitalist Globalization," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(6), pages 77-92.
    8. Bob Jessop & Ngai-Ling Sum, 2006. "Beyond the Regulation Approach," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3606.
    9. Andong Zhu & David M. Kotz, 2011. "The Dependence of China's Economic Growth on Exports and Investment," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 43(1), pages 9-32, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. ten Brink, Tobias, 2011. "Institutional change in market-liberal state capitalism. An integrative perspective on the development of the private business sector in China," MPIfG Discussion Paper 11/2, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    2. ten Brink, Tobias, 2010. "Strukturmerkmale des chinesischen Kapitalismus," MPIfG Discussion Paper 10/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    3. Tobias ten Brink, 2011. "Patterns of Distinctive Institutional Change in Chinese Capitalism," Chapters, in: Werner Pascha & Cornelia Storz & Markus Taube (ed.), Institutional Variety in East Asia, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Martynov, Arkady, 2019. "The phenomena of after socialist institutional transformation: China and Russia comparison," MPRA Paper 97692, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 18 Dec 2019.
    5. Hassel, Anke, 2011. "The paradox of liberalization – understanding dualism and the recovery of the German political economy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 53212, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Leszczyński Dariusz, 2015. "Emerging Varieties of Capitalism in Transition Countries: Literature Review," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 48(1), pages 101-124, December.
    7. Emre Ünal, 2016. "A comparative analysis of export growth in Turkey and China through macroeconomic and institutional factors," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 57-91, June.
    8. Anke Hassel, 2011. "The paradox of liberalization – Understanding dualism and the recovery of the German political economy," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 42, European Institute, LSE.
    9. Anke Hassel, 2014. "The Paradox of Liberalization — Understanding Dualism and the Recovery of the German Political Economy," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 52(1), pages 57-81, March.
    10. Meelen, Toon & Herrmann, Andrea M. & Faber, Jan, 2017. "Disentangling patterns of economic, technological and innovative specialization of Western economies: An assessment of the Varieties-of-Capitalism theory on comparative institutional advantages," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 667-677.
    11. Feng, Qu & Wu, Guiying Laura, 2018. "On the reverse causality between output and infrastructure: The case of China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 97-104.
    12. Abasov, Muzaffar, 2017. "Comparison of Chinese reform experience with other transition economies (in the example of Russia)," MPRA Paper 79841, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Jarreau, Joachim & Poncet, Sandra, 2012. "Export sophistication and economic growth: Evidence from China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 281-292.
    14. Girardone, Claudia & Kokas, Sotirios & Wood, Geoffrey, 2021. "Diversity and women in finance: Challenges and future perspectives," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    15. repec:lic:licosd:20508 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Da Teng & Douglas B. Fuller & Chengchun Li, 2018. "Institutional change and corporate governance diversity in China’s SOEs," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 273-293, May.
    17. Bruno Amable & Donatella Gatti & Jan Schumacher, 2006. "Welfare-State Retrenchment: The Partisan Effect Revisited," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 22(3), pages 426-444, Autumn.
    18. Nathalie Greenan & Ekaterina Kalugina & Emmanuelle Walkowiak, 2014. "Has the quality of working life improved in the EU-15 between 1995 and 2005?," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 23(2), pages 399-428.
    19. Grande, Rafael & Muñoz de Bustillo, Rafael & Fernández Macías, Enrique & Antón, José Ignacio, 2020. "Innovation and job quality. A firm-level exploration," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 130-142.
    20. Reto Bürgisser & Donato Di Carlo, 2023. "Blessing or Curse? The Rise of Tourism‐Led Growth in Europe's Southern Periphery," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(1), pages 236-258, January.
    21. Chloé Duvivier Duvivier & Mary-Françoise Renard & Shi Li, 2012. "Are workers close to cities paid higher non-agricultural wages in rural China?," CERDI Working papers halshs-00673698, HAL.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgw:117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mpigfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.