IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/lueimf/48.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Mitarbeiterorientierte Personalpolitik und Unternehmenserfolg: Ein Anwendungsfall der Anreiz-Beitrags-Theorie

Author

Listed:
  • Martin, Albert
  • Kabst, Rüdiger

Abstract

Mitarbeiterorientierte Personalpolitik ist eine seit langem diskutierte interessengeladene Thematik. Wir wissen jedoch bislang wenig darüber, was Unternehmen veranlasst, eine mitarbeiterorientierte Personalpolitik zu verfolgen. Diese Fragestellung ist weder trivial noch irrelevant - ganz im Gegenteil. Die anglo-amerikanische Forschung zu High Commitment Human Ressource Management legt eine positive Beziehung zum Unternehmenserfolg nahe, welche aus normativen Aspekten anzieht und den Personalwissenschaftler sowie Personalpraktiker auf der Suche nach dem Mehrwert der Personalarbeit besonders interessiert. Diese thematische Relevanz aufgreifend, betrachten wir zwei Fragen: (1) Wie plausibel ist es, einen Zusammenhang zwischen einer mitarbeiterorientierten Personalpolitik und dem ökonomischen Erfolg eines Unternehmens zu vermuten (und wie ließe sich ein derartiger Zusammenhang theoretisch begründen)? (2) Unter welchen Umständen kommt es zur Herausbildung einer mitarbeiterorientierten Personalpolitik? Als Erklärungsansatz ziehen wir die Anreiz-Beitrags-Theorie heran, weil sie robuste Aussagen mit hohem Allgemeinheitsanspruch bereithält. Zudem eignet sich diese aufgrund der ökonomisch-austausch-theoretischen Sicht besonders für die Analyse der aufgeworfenen Fragen auf Unterneh-mensebene. Die aus der theoretischen Diskussion abgeleiteten Hypothesen werden anhand des deutschen Datensatzes des Cranfield Project on International Human Resource Ma-nagement (Cranet) geprüft und im Lichte der gewonnenen Ergebnisse diskutiert.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin, Albert & Kabst, Rüdiger, 2013. "Mitarbeiterorientierte Personalpolitik und Unternehmenserfolg: Ein Anwendungsfall der Anreiz-Beitrags-Theorie," Schriften aus dem Institut für Mittelstandsforschung 48, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IMF).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:lueimf:48
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/85268/1/770565115.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nikolaus Beck & Rüdiger Kabst & Peter Walgenbach, 2009. "The cultural dependence of vocational training," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 40(8), pages 1374-1395, October.
    2. Paul Osterman, 1994. "How Common is Workplace Transformation and Who Adopts it?," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 47(2), pages 173-188, January.
    3. Jürgen Bruns & Rüdiger Kabst, 2005. "Interim-Management: A Paradox for Leadership Research?," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 16(4), pages 512-524.
    4. Chris Brewster & Wolfgang Mayrhofer & Michael Morley (ed.), 2000. "New Challenges for European Human Resource Management," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-59795-2.
    5. Catherine Truss & Lynda Gratton & Veronica Hope‐Hailey & Patrick McGovern & Philip Stiles, 1997. "Soft and Hard Models of Human Resource Management: A Reappraisal," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 53-73, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Newburry, William & Gardberg, Naomi A. & Sanchez, Juan I., 2014. "Employer Attractiveness in Latin America: The Association Among Foreignness, Internationalization and Talent Recruitment," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 327-344.
    2. Eguchi, Kyota, 2004. "Trainers' dilemma of choosing between training and promotion," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(6), pages 765-783, December.
    3. Boucekkine, Raouf & Crifo, Patricia, 2008. "Human Capital Accumulation And The Transition From Specialization To Multitasking," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 320-344, June.
    4. Nicholas Bloom & Renata Lemos & Raffaella Sadun & John Van Reenen, 2020. "Healthy Business? Managerial Education and Management in Health Care," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 102(3), pages 506-517, July.
    5. Cecilia Garcia-Penalosa & Eve Caroli & Philippe Aghion, 1999. "Inequality and Economic Growth: The Perspective of the New Growth Theories," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 37(4), pages 1615-1660, December.
    6. Simon Eisele & Martin R. Schneider, 2020. "What Do Unions Do to Work Design? Computer Use, Union Presence, and Tayloristic Jobs in Britain," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), pages 604-626, October.
    7. Michael J. Handel & Maury Gittleman, 1999. "Is There a Wage Payoff to Innovative Work Practices?," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_288, Levy Economics Institute.
    8. Sandra E. Black & Lisa Lynch & Anya Krivelyova, 2003. "How Workers Fare When Employers Innovate," NBER Working Papers 9569, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Radoslava Nikolova, 2005. "Mutual Monitoring versus Incentive Pay in Teams," Working Papers 2005-39, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    10. Nicholas Bloom & Renata Lemos & Raffaella Sadun & Daniela Scur & John Van Reenen, 2014. "The New Empirical Economics of Management," NBER Working Papers 20102, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. İ. Akçomak & Lex Borghans & Bas Weel, 2011. "Measuring and Interpreting Trends in the Division of Labour in the Netherlands," De Economist, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 435-482, December.
    12. Lloyd C. Harris & Emmanuel Ogbonna, 2003. "The Organization of Marketing: A Study of Decentralized, Devolved and Dispersed Marketing Activity," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 483-512, March.
    13. Riccardo Leoni, 2013. "Organization of work practices and productivity: an assessment of research on world- class manufacturing," Chapters, in: Anna Grandori (ed.), Handbook of Economic Organization, chapter 17, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. repec:eee:labchp:v:3:y:1999:i:pb:p:2373-2437 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Bayo-Moriones, Alberto & Galdon-Sanchez, Jose Enrique & Martinez-de-Morentin, Sara, 2016. "Competitive Strategy, Performance Appraisal and Firm Results," IZA Discussion Papers 10041, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Hutchens, R & Nolen, PJ, 2006. "Will The Real Family-Friendly Employer Please Stand Up: Who Permits Parents To Reduce Working Hours For Purposes of Childcare?," Economics Discussion Papers 2905, University of Essex, Department of Economics.
    17. Seogjun Lee & Seung Woon Oh & Kichan Nam, 2016. "Transformational and Transactional Factors for the Successful Implementation of Enterprise Architecture in Public Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-15, May.
    18. Uwe Jirjahn & Kornelius Kraft, 2010. "Teamwork And Intra‐Firm Wage Dispersion Among Blue‐Collar Workers," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 57(4), pages 404-429, September.
    19. Larry W. Hunter & Annette Bernhardt & Katherine L. Hughes & Eva Skuratowicz, 2000. "It's Not Just the ATMs: Technology, Firm Strategies, Jobs, and Earnings in Retail Banking," Center for Financial Institutions Working Papers 00-31, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.
    20. Jaap Paauwe, 2009. "HRM and Performance: Achievements, Methodological Issues and Prospects," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 129-142, January.
    21. Sandra E. Black & Lisa M. Lynch, 2005. "Measuring Organizational Capital in the New Economy," NBER Chapters, in: Measuring Capital in the New Economy, pages 205-236, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:lueimf:48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.leuphana.de/institute/imo.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.