IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/upf/upfgen/1305.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Equivalence of piecewise-linear approximation and Lagrangian relaxation for network revenue management

Author

Listed:
  • Sumit Kunnumkal
  • Kalyan Talluri

Abstract

The network revenue management (RM) problem arises in airline, hotel, media, and other industries where the sale products use multiple resources. It can be formulated as a stochastic dynamic program but the dynamic program is computationally intractable because of an exponentially large state space, and a number of heuristics have been proposed to approximate it. Notable amongst these -both for their revenue performance, as well as their theoretically sound basis- are approximate dynamic programming methods that approximate the value function by basis functions (both affine functions as well as piecewise-linear functions have been proposed for network RM) and decomposition methods that relax the constraints of the dynamic program to solve simpler dynamic programs (such as the Lagrangian relaxation methods). In this paper we show that these two seemingly distinct approaches coincide for the network RM dynamic program, i.e., the piecewise-linear approximation method and the Lagrangian relaxation method are one and the same.

Suggested Citation

  • Sumit Kunnumkal & Kalyan Talluri, 2011. "Equivalence of piecewise-linear approximation and Lagrangian relaxation for network revenue management," Economics Working Papers 1305, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Nov 2012.
  • Handle: RePEc:upf:upfgen:1305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econ-papers.upf.edu/papers/1305.pdf
    File Function: Whole Paper
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meissner, Joern & Strauss, Arne, 2012. "Network revenue management with inventory-sensitive bid prices and customer choice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 459-468.
    2. Dan Zhang & Daniel Adelman, 2009. "An Approximate Dynamic Programming Approach to Network Revenue Management with Customer Choice," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 381-394, August.
    3. Isabelle Huault & V. Perret & S. Charreire-Petit, 2007. "Management," Post-Print halshs-00337676, HAL.
    4. Sumit Kunnumkal & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2010. "Computing Time-Dependent Bid Prices in Network Revenue Management Problems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 38-62, February.
    5. Huseyin Topaloglu, 2009. "Using Lagrangian Relaxation to Compute Capacity-Dependent Bid Prices in Network Revenue Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(3), pages 637-649, June.
    6. Daniel Adelman, 2007. "Dynamic Bid Prices in Revenue Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(4), pages 647-661, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David B. Brown & James E. Smith, 2014. "Information Relaxations, Duality, and Convex Stochastic Dynamic Programs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1394-1415, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sumit Kunnumkal & Kalyan Talluri, 2011. "Equivalence of Piecewise-Linear Approximation and Lagrangian Relaxation for Network Revenue Management," Working Papers 608, Barcelona School of Economics.
    2. Chaoxu Tong & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2014. "On the Approximate Linear Programming Approach for Network Revenue Management Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 121-134, February.
    3. David Sayah, 2015. "Approximate Linear Programming in Network Revenue Management with Multiple Modes," Working Papers 1518, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
    4. Thomas W. M. Vossen & Dan Zhang, 2015. "Reductions of Approximate Linear Programs for Network Revenue Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1352-1371, December.
    5. Nicolas Houy & François Le Grand, 2015. "The Monte Carlo first-come-first-served heuristic for network revenue management," Working Papers halshs-01155698, HAL.
    6. Huang, Kuancheng & Lin, Chia-Yi, 2014. "A simulation analysis for the re-solving issue of the network revenue management problem," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 36-42.
    7. Mika Sumida & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2019. "An Approximation Algorithm for Capacity Allocation Over a Single Flight Leg with Fare-Locking," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 83-99, February.
    8. Meissner, Joern & Strauss, Arne, 2012. "Improved bid prices for choice-based network revenue management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(2), pages 417-427.
    9. Sumit Kunnumkal & Kalyan Talluri, 2019. "A strong Lagrangian relaxation for general discrete-choice network revenue management," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 275-310, May.
    10. Nicolas Houy & François Le Grand, 2015. "Financing and advising with (over)confident entrepreneurs : an experimental investigation," Working Papers 1514, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    11. Juan M. Chaneton & Gustavo Vulcano, 2011. "Computing Bid Prices for Revenue Management Under Customer Choice Behavior," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 452-470, October.
    12. Sumit Kunnumkal & Kalyan Talluri, 2016. "On a Piecewise-Linear Approximation for Network Revenue Management," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 72-91, February.
    13. Strauss, Arne K. & Klein, Robert & Steinhardt, Claudius, 2018. "A review of choice-based revenue management: Theory and methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 375-387.
    14. Meissner, Joern & Strauss, Arne, 2012. "Network revenue management with inventory-sensitive bid prices and customer choice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 459-468.
    15. Dong Li & Zhan Pang & Lixian Qian, 2023. "Bid price controls for car rental network revenue management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(1), pages 261-282, January.
    16. Yuhang Ma & Paat Rusmevichientong & Mika Sumida & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2020. "An Approximation Algorithm for Network Revenue Management Under Nonstationary Arrivals," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 834-855, May.
    17. Wuyang Yuan & Lei Nie & Xin Wu & Huiling Fu, 2018. "A dynamic bid price approach for the seat inventory control problem in railway networks with consideration of passenger transfer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-23, August.
    18. Hossein Jahandideh & Julie Ward Drew & Filippo Balestrieri & Kevin McCardle, 2020. "Individualized Pricing for a Cloud Provider Hosting Interactive Applications," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 130-147, December.
    19. Kalyan Talluri, 2014. "New Formulations for Choice Network Revenue Management," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 401-413, May.
    20. Dan Zhang, 2011. "An Improved Dynamic Programming Decomposition Approach for Network Revenue Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 35-52, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    network revenue management; linear programming; approximate dynamic programming; Lagrangian relaxation methods;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • L93 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Air Transportation
    • L83 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Sports; Gambling; Restaurants; Recreation; Tourism
    • M11 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Production Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:upf:upfgen:1305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econ.upf.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.