IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/phd/dpaper/dp_2000-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic Perspective for Agricultural Biotechnology Research Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Rola, Agnes C.

Abstract

There is no other agricultural technology that has been subjected to a lot of controversies than agricultural biotechnology. More than ever, intelligent decisions about this technology would be based on scientific data and objective analyses. As we meet the challenges of food security in a sustainable way, and given the very limited land and energy resources; available alternatives are few. Because of its unique features, the economic study in biotechnology deviates from the standard economic impact of technological changes, such as mechanization. It is more closely related to measuring the impact of pesticides, though the issue of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) has not been raised in the chemical technology. In addition, just like pesticides, some biotechnology products have externality effects. Thus the economic framework for its analysis will be consistent with the issues about the economics of sustainability, which has long-term benefits/costs and considered to be very knowledge intensive for both farmers and other handlers. Some of the features that could impinge on the economic issues of agricultural biotechnology are the private-public sector partnership in research, development, and technology transfer; the role of the IPRs in both technology development and transfer; the regulations about biosafety and other licensing requirements for ultimate commercialization; and the management of the technology once in the market and in the farmers’ fields. These could affect the cost and the output price structure. The ex ante economic analysis could guide us in the measurement of potential effectiveness and efficiency of biotechnology, and in general, in the research prioritization.

Suggested Citation

  • Rola, Agnes C., 2000. "Economic Perspective for Agricultural Biotechnology Research Planning," Discussion Papers DP 2000-10, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    • Handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2000-10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.pids.gov.ph/publication/discussion-papers/economic-perspective-for-agricultural-biotechnology-research-planning
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Catherine M. Lemieux & Michael K. Wohlgenant, 1989. "Ex Ante Evaluation of the Economic Impact of Agricultural Biotechnology: The Case of Porcine Somatotropin," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(4), pages 903-914.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oliver Musa Lavelah & Ma. Lourdes S. Edaño & Pompe C. Sta. Cruz & Josefina T. Dizon, 2021. "Growth, Yield and Grain Quality of Three Maize Varieties and Mungbean under Different Cropping Systems Inoculated with Mykovam®," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(4), pages 330-337, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. McVey, Marty Jay, 1996. "Valuing quality differentiated grains from a total logistics perspective," ISU General Staff Papers 1996010108000012326, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Mullen, John D. & Alston, Julian M., 1995. "The Impact on the Australian Lamb Industry of Producing Larger Leaner Lamb," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 62(01), pages 1-19, April.
    3. O'Donnell, Christopher J. & Griffith, Garry R. & Nightingale, John J. & Piggott, Roley R., 2003. "Testing for Market Power in the Australian Grains and Oilseeds Industries: Further Results," 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia 57930, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    4. Hafi, Ahmed & Reynolds, Russ & Rose, Roger, 1995. "Issues in estimating economic effects of a disease outbreak in poultry: The case of Newcastle disease," 1995 Conference (39th), February 14-16, 1995, Perth, Australia 170836, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    5. Strappazzon, Loris & Eigenraam, Mark & Wimalasuriya, Rukman & Stoneham, Gary, 2002. "Estimating Research Benefits When there is Input and Output Substitution: An Applied Analysis," 2002 Conference (46th), February 13-15, 2002, Canberra, Australia 125167, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    6. Lee, Hanbin & Sexton, Richard J. & Sumner, Daniel A., 2021. "Economics of Mandates on Farm Practices: Lessons from California’s Proposition 12 Regulations on Pork Sold in California," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 313920, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Constantine, John H & Alston, Julian M & Smith, Vincent H, 1994. "Economic Impacts of the California One-Variety Cotton Law," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 102(5), pages 951-974, October.
    8. Dennis, Elliott J. & Schroeder, Ted C. & Renter, David G. & Pendell, Dustin L., 2018. "Value of Arrival Metaphylaxis in U.S. Cattle Industry," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 43(2), May.
    9. Christopher J. O'Donnell & Garry R. Griffith & John J. Nightingale & Roley R. Piggott, 2007. "Testing for market power in the Australian grains and oilseeds industries," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(3), pages 349-376.
    10. Heng, Yan & House, Lisa A., 2017. "Do U.S. Suppliers Benefit from South Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement? The Case of Orange Juice," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258396, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Voon, Thomas Jan P., 1996. "Evaluating Quality Improvement in Nonhomogeneous Agricultural Commodities: The Case of Australian Beef," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(02), pages 1-7, August.
    12. Tun-Hsiang Yu & C. Phillip Baumel & Connie L. Hardy & Marty J. McVey & Lawrence A. Johnson & Jerry L. Sell, 2001. "Impacts of six genetic modifications of corn on feed cost and consumption of traditional feed ingredients," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(1), pages 115-127.
    13. Bohorova, Svetlana & Scrimgeour, Frank G., 2000. "Evaluating The Potential Productivity Gains Associated With Biotechnological Improvement: The Case Of Kiwifruit In New Zealand," Transitions in Agbiotech: Economics of Strategy and Policy, June 24-25, 1999, Washington, D.C. 25995, Regional Research Project NE-165 Private Strategies, Public Policies, and Food System Performance.
    14. Ambarawati, I Gusti Agung Ayu & Zhao, Xueyan & Griffith, Garry R. & Piggott, Roley R., 2003. "Distribution of Gains from Cattle Development in a Multi-Stage Production System: The Case of the Bali Beef Industry," 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia 57829, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    15. Lee, Hanbin & Sexton, Richard J. & Sumner, Daniel A., 2022. "Government Restrictions on Food Available to Consumers: Economics of Regulations that Limit Farming Practices for Products Sold within Jurisdictions, with Application to California’s 2022 Pork Rules," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322438, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Yu, Tun-Hsiang, 1998. "The benefits and costs of transporting an identity preserved product from Iowa to Taiwan," ISU General Staff Papers 1998010108000018184, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    17. X. Zhao & J.D. Mullen & G.R. Griffith & R.R. Piggott & W.E. Griffiths, 2002. "The Economic Incidence of R&D and Promotion Investments in the Australian Beef Industry," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 16/02, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    18. Mounter, Stuart W. & Griffith, Garry R. & Piggott, Roley R. & Mullen, John D., 2005. "The Payoff from Generic Advertising by the Australian Pig Industry: Further Results Relative to the Payoff from R&D," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 13.
    19. Govindasamy, Ramu & Liu, Donald J. & Kliebenstein, James, 1993. "Impacts of PST on Optimal Production and Marketing Decisions of a Grow-Finish Hog Farm Operation," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(2), pages 166-174, October.
    20. repec:ags:aaea22:335872 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Zhao, Xueyan & Mullen, John D. & Griffith, Garry R. & Griffiths, William E. & Piggott, Roley R., 2000. "An Equilibrium Displacement Model of the Australian Beef Industry," Research Reports 28007, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    biotechnology;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2000-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aniceto Orbeta (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pidgvph.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.