IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/arerjl/31544.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts Of Pst On Optimal Production And Marketing Decisions Of A Grow-Finish Hog Farm Operation

Author

Listed:
  • Govindasamy, Ramu
  • Liu, Donald J.
  • Kliebenstein, James B.

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of PST on the optimal production/marketing decisions of a grow-finish hog farm operation. The analysis evaluates PST from three angles: the feed efficiency effect, the leaner meat price effect, and the aggregate-supply-induced price effect. When limited to the feed efficiency effect only, the primary response to the new technology is to increase the animal turnover rate of the operation. When the leaner meat price effect is also included, marketing weight increases while turnover rate remains relatively unchanged. Additionally, if the increased aggregate supply depressed the market price by more than 10%, the benefits from improved feed efficiency and learner meat will be completely dissipated. Aggregate price adjustments (reductions) of less than 10 percent maintained positive producer benefits resulting from improved feed efficiency and leaner meat.

Suggested Citation

  • Govindasamy, Ramu & Liu, Donald J. & Kliebenstein, James B., 1993. "Impacts Of Pst On Optimal Production And Marketing Decisions Of A Grow-Finish Hog Farm Operation," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 22(2), pages 1-9, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:arerjl:31544
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.31544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/31544/files/22020166.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.31544?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Govindasamy, Ramu & Liu, Donald & Kliebenstein, James, 1993. "Economic Impacts of Porcine Somatotropin on a Farrow-to-Finish Hog Farm Operation," ISU General Staff Papers 199302010800001247, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Jean-Paul Chavas & James Kliebenstein & Thomas D. Crenshaw, 1985. "Modeling Dynamic Agricultural Production Response: The Case of Swine Production," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 67(3), pages 636-646.
    3. Harry M. Kaiser & Loren W. Tauer, 1989. "Impact of Bovine Somatotropin on U.S. Dairy Markets under Alternative Policy Options," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 11(1), pages 59-73.
    4. Catherine M. Lemieux & Michael K. Wohlgenant, 1989. "Ex Ante Evaluation of the Economic Impact of Agricultural Biotechnology: The Case of Porcine Somatotropin," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(4), pages 903-914.
    5. Kliebenstein, James & Buhr, Brian L. & Hayenga, Marvin L., 1989. "Economic Impacts of Technology Adoption: The Case of Pst," Staff General Research Papers Archive 11634, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Govindasamy, Ramu & Liu, Donald & Kliebenstein, James, 1993. "Economic Impacts of Porcine Somatotropin on a Farrow-to-Finish Hog Farm Operation," ISU General Staff Papers 199302010800001247, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Roka, Fritz M. & Hoag, Dana L., 1996. "Manure Value And Liveweight Swine Decisions," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(1), pages 1-10, July.
    3. Trapp, James N., 1989. "The Dawning Of The Age Of Dynamic Theory: Its Implications For Agricultural Economics Research And Teaching," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 21(1), pages 1-11, July.
    4. Leen, Frederik & Van den Broeke, Alice & Aluwé, Marijke & Ludwig, Lauwers & Sam, Millet & Jef, Van Meensel, 2017. "Simulation Modelling To Provide Insights Into The Optimization Of Delivery Weights Of Finisher Pigs," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 261272, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Roemen, J.H.J. & de Klein, J., 1998. "An optimal delivery strategy for porkers with heterogeneity and dependent prices," Other publications TiSEM 4775b203-6880-43c8-b1c7-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. McVey, Marty Jay, 1996. "Valuing quality differentiated grains from a total logistics perspective," ISU General Staff Papers 1996010108000012326, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    7. Kaiser, Harry M., 1990. "Bovine Somatotropin and Milk Production: Potential Impacts for the U.S," Staff Papers 121538, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    8. Hennessy, David A., 2006. "Feeding and the Equilibrium Feeder Animal Price-Weight Schedule," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 31(2), pages 1-23, August.
    9. Kaiser, Harry M., 1992. "Market Impacts Of Bovine Somatropin: A Supply And Demand Analysis," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(1), pages 1-12, July.
    10. Boland, Michael A. & Foster, Kenneth A. & Preckel, Paul V., 1999. "Nutrition And The Economics Of Swine Management," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 31(1), pages 1-14, April.
    11. Mullen, John D. & Alston, Julian M., 1995. "The Impact on the Australian Lamb Industry of Producing Larger Leaner Lamb," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 62(01), pages 1-19, April.
    12. O'Donnell, Christopher J. & Griffith, Garry R. & Nightingale, John J. & Piggott, Roley R., 2003. "Testing for Market Power in the Australian Grains and Oilseeds Industries: Further Results," 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia 57930, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    13. Hafi, Ahmed & Reynolds, Russ & Rose, Roger, 1995. "Issues in estimating economic effects of a disease outbreak in poultry: The case of Newcastle disease," 1995 Conference (39th), February 14-16, 1995, Perth, Australia 170836, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    14. Mayer, D. G. & Belward, J. A. & Burrage, K., 1996. "Use of advanced techniques to optimize a multi-dimensional dairy model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 239-253.
    15. Lawrence, John D. & Kaylen, Michael S., 1990. "Risk Management For Livestock Producers: Hedging And Contract Production," Staff Papers 13496, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    16. Mariano J. Gonzalez-Alcorta & Jeffrey H. Dorfman & Gene M. Pesti, 1994. "Maximizing profit in broiler production as prices change: A simple approximation with practical value," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(5), pages 389-399.
    17. Strappazzon, Loris & Eigenraam, Mark & Wimalasuriya, Rukman & Stoneham, Gary, 2002. "Estimating Research Benefits When there is Input and Output Substitution: An Applied Analysis," 2002 Conference (46th), February 13-15, 2002, Canberra, Australia 125167, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    18. Lee, Hanbin & Sexton, Richard J. & Sumner, Daniel A., 2021. "Economics of Mandates on Farm Practices: Lessons from California’s Proposition 12 Regulations on Pork Sold in California," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 313920, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Li, Ning & Preckel, Paul V. & Foster, Kenneth A. & Schinckel, Allan P., 2003. "Analysis of Economically Optimal Nutrition and Marketing Strategies for Paylean® Usage in Hog Production," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(2), pages 1-15, August.
    20. Govindasamy, Ramu & Lie, Donald & Kliebenstein, James, 1992. "Economic Impact of PST on a Farrow-to-Finish Hog Farm Operation," WAEA/ WFEA Conference Archive (1929-1995) 321369, Western Agricultural Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Livestock Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:arerjl:31544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nareaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.