IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jageco/v43y1992i2p243-247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Cross‐Commodity Appraisal Of Demand‐Raising Research Benefits: Pork And Chicken In Australia

Author

Listed:
  • T. J. P. Voon

Abstract

A multi‐commodity model is developed for evaluating the gains from research which raises the demand for a commodity, and applied to the pig and chicken industries in Australia. The major finding is that the gain to pork producers is larger, and the gain to consumers smaller, with a cross‐commodity consideration than without. Bigger differences in results are observed with larger values of the cross‐price elasticity between pork and chicken, and with a larger shift in demand for chicken. However, the aggregate benefits to the Australian pig industry are not significantly affected by price changes in the market for chicken. The implication of the analysis is that, by ignoring the cross‐market feedback between commodities closely related in consumption, consumers (or taxpayers) of the commodity experiencing a rise in demand may bear a higher‐than‐optimal outlay on public research directed to increasing the demand for that commodity.

Suggested Citation

  • T. J. P. Voon, 1992. "A Cross‐Commodity Appraisal Of Demand‐Raising Research Benefits: Pork And Chicken In Australia," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(2), pages 243-247, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jageco:v:43:y:1992:i:2:p:243-247
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1992.tb00218.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1992.tb00218.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1992.tb00218.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger N. Rose, 1980. "Supply Shifts and Research Benefits: Comment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 62(4), pages 834-837.
    2. repec:bla:ecorec:v:60:y:1984:i:168:p:45-56 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Richardson, Robert A. & O'Connor, J.G., 1978. "Changes in the Structure of Supply Response in the Australian Pig Industry," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 46(03), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Fisher, Brian S., 1979. "The Demand For Meat - An Example Of An Incomplete Commodity Demand System," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 23(3), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Laurian J. Unnevehr, 1986. "Consumer Demand for Rice Grain Quality and Returns to Research for Quality Improvement in Southeast Asia," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 68(3), pages 634-641.
    6. Brian S. Fisher, 1979. "The Demand For Meat — An Example Of An Incomplete Commodity Demand System," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 23(3), pages 220-230, December.
    7. Norton, George W. & Davis, Jeffrey S., 1979. "Review Of Methods Used To Evaluate Returns To Agricultural Research," Staff Papers 13520, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    8. George W. Norton & Jeffrey S. Davis, 1981. "Evaluating Returns to Agricultural Research: A Review," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 63(4), pages 685-699.
    9. Alston, Julian M., 1990. "Research Benefits in a Multimarket Setting," ISNAR Archive 310790, CGIAR > International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    10. Adams, Philip D., 1987. "Agricultural Supply Response in ORANI," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 55(03), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Catherine M. Lemieux & Michael K. Wohlgenant, 1989. "Ex Ante Evaluation of the Economic Impact of Agricultural Biotechnology: The Case of Porcine Somatotropin," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(4), pages 903-914.
    12. J. P. Voon & G. W. Edwards, 1991. "Research Payoff From Quality Improvement: The Case Of Backfat Depth In Pigs," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 66-76, January.
    13. R. K. Lindner & F. G. Jarrett, 1978. "Supply Shifts and the Size of Research Benefits," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 60(1), pages 48-58.
    14. Jane Murray, 1984. "Retail Demand for Meat in Australia: A Utility Theory Approach," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 60(1), pages 45-56, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Xueyan & Mullen, John D. & Griffith, Garry R. & Griffiths, William E. & Piggott, Roley R., 2000. "An Equilibrium Displacement Model of the Australian Beef Industry," Research Reports 28007, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.
    2. Wilcox, Christopher J., 1989. "Social Costs Of Regulation Of Primary Industry: An Application To Animal Welfare Regulation Of The Victorian Pig Industry," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 33(3), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Michael Harris & Alan Lloyd, 1991. "The Returns to Agricultural Research and the Underinvestment Hypothesis ‐ A Survey," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 24(3), pages 16-27, July.
    4. A. C. Herruzo, 1992. "Producer Benefits From Technology Induced Supply Shifts In The Ec Cotton Regime," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 56-63, January.
    5. Voon, Thomas Jan P., 1996. "Evaluating Quality Improvement in Nonhomogeneous Agricultural Commodities: The Case of Australian Beef," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(02), pages 1-7, August.
    6. Miller, Gay & Rosenblatt, Joseph & Hushak, Leroy, 1987. "The Effects Of Supply Shifts On Producers Surplus," 1987 Annual Meeting, August 2-5, East Lansing, Michigan 270116, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    7. Dey, Madan Mohan & Kumar, Praduman & Chen, Oai Li & Khan, Md. Akhtaruzzaman & Barik, Nagesh Kumar & Li, Luping & Nissapa, Ayut & Pham, Ngoc Sao, 2013. "Potential impact of genetically improved carp strains in Asia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 306-320.
    8. Brennan, John P. & Godyn, Dirk L. & Johnston, Brian G., 1989. "An Economic Framework for Evaluating New Wheat Varieties," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 57(01-02-03), pages 1-18, December.
    9. McVey, Marty Jay, 1996. "Valuing quality differentiated grains from a total logistics perspective," ISU General Staff Papers 1996010108000012326, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    10. Mullen, John D. & Alston, Julian M., 1995. "The Impact on the Australian Lamb Industry of Producing Larger Leaner Lamb," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 62(01), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Alston, Julian M., 1991. "Research Benefits in a Multimarket Setting: A Review," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 59(01), pages 1-30, April.
    12. Vere, David T. & Griffith, Garry R., 1988. "Supply and Demand Interactions in the New South Wales Prime Lamb Market," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 56(03), pages 1-19, December.
    13. Paul Cashin, 1991. "A Model Of The Disaggregated Demand For Meat In Australia," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 35(3), pages 263-283, December.
    14. Hutasuhut, Maradoli & Chang, Hui-Shung & Griffith, Garry & O’Donnell, Chris & Doran, Howard, 2002. "The Demand for Beef in Indonesia: Implications for Australian Agribusiness," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 10, pages 1-10, August.
    15. Quade, Kathryn J. & Brennan, John P. & Aw-Hassan, Aden & Nordblom, Thomas L., 2002. "Impact on Australia of ICARDA’s Research on Kabuli Chickpeas," 2002 Conference (46th), February 13-15, 2002, Canberra, Australia 173989, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    16. Vernon Ruttan, 1982. "Bureaucratic productivity: The case of agricultural research revisited — A rejoinder," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 319-329, January.
    17. Widmer, Lorne & Fox, Glenn & Brinkman, George, 1987. "The Rate of Return to Beef Cattle Research in Canda," Working Papers 244821, University of Guelph, Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    18. Julian M. Alston & James A. Chalfant, 1987. "Weak Separability And A Test For The Specification Of Income In Demand Models With An Application To The Demand For Meat In Australia," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 31(1), pages 1-15, April.
    19. Bhati, U.N., 1987. "Supply And Demand Responses For Poultry Meat In Australia," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1-10, December.
    20. Bradford F. Mills, 1998. "Ex Ante Research Evaluation and Regional Trade Flows: Maize in Kenya," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3), pages 393-408, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jageco:v:43:y:1992:i:2:p:243-247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-857X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.