IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/halshs-02401194.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L'entreprise face aux mondes virtuels

Author

Listed:
  • David Albert

    (Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres)

Abstract

Les possibilités qu'offrent les mondes virtuels aux entreprises et, réciproquement, la façon dont il est possible d'inventer le management qui utiliserait ce potentiel en sont encore aux balbutiements et les expériences avancées concernent des cercles relativement restreints de chercheurs et d'entreprises pionniers. Les conclusions, au stade actuel de développement des mondes virtuels – voir par exemple les rapports du Gartner Group en 2008 ou, plus récemment, un certain nombre d'articles publiés sur Internet Actu – sont convergentes : c'est pour l'instant beaucoup de bruit pour peu de résultats mais, ajoute-t-on, de prochaines générations de mondes virtuels pourraient changer la donne. Il se peut aussi que nous n'ayons pas encore inventé le management qui saurait utiliser les possibilités des mondes disponibles. Les mondes virtuels de la première décennie du 21ème siècle sont-ils si limités ? N'aurionsnous pas su innover ? Si tel est le cas, comment innover avec et dans les mondes virtuels pour qu'ils constituent un levier à haut potentiel, et quelles perspectives se dessinent pour les années à venir ? Le présent projet a apporté sa modeste contribution à cette perspective : de nombreux espaces conceptuels ont été ouverts et explorés, de nombreux connaissances ont été produites, qui pourraient à moyen terme être utilisées dans des projets concrets.

Suggested Citation

  • David Albert, 2012. "L'entreprise face aux mondes virtuels," Working Papers halshs-02401194, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-02401194
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02401194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02401194/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2476 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Robert Anson & Robert Bostrom & Bayard Wynne, 1995. "An Experiment Assessing Group Support System and Facilitator Effects on Meeting Outcomes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(2), pages 189-208, February.
    3. Stephen J Kobrin, 2001. "Territoriality and the Governance of Cyberspace," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 32(4), pages 687-704, December.
    4. Christopher Gorse & Stephen Emmitt, 2007. "Communication behaviour during management and design team meetings: a comparison of group interaction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(11), pages 1197-1213.
    5. Edward Castronova, 2001. "Virtual Worlds: A First-Hand Account of Market and Society on the Cyberian Frontier," CESifo Working Paper Series 618, CESifo.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kanis Saengchote & Voraprapa Nakavachara & Yishuang Xu, 2023. "Capitalising the Network Externalities of New Land Supply in the Metaverse," PIER Discussion Papers 203, Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Shaheer, Noman Ahmed & Li, Sali, 2020. "The CAGE around cyberspace? How digital innovations internationalize in a virtual world," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(1).
    3. Borowiecki, Karol J. & Bakhshi, Hasan, 2018. "Did you really take a hit? Understanding how video games playing affects individuals," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 313-326.
    4. Kanis Saengchote & Voraprapa Nakavachara & Yishuang Xu, 2023. "Capitalising the Network Externalities of New Land Supply in the Metaverse," Papers 2303.17180, arXiv.org.
    5. Douglas Dean & Richard Orwig & Douglas Vogel, 2000. "Facilitation Methods for Collaborative Modeling Tools," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 109-128, March.
    6. Andreas Nicklisch & Tobias Salz, 2008. "Reciprocity and status in a virtual field experiment," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2008_37, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    7. Karol Borowiecki & Juan Prieto-Rodriguez, 2015. "Video games playing: A substitute for cultural consumptions?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 39(3), pages 239-258, August.
    8. Simon Hartmann & Thomas Lindner & Jakob Müllner & Jonas Puck, 2022. "Beyond the nation-state: Anchoring supranational institutions in international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(6), pages 1282-1306, August.
    9. T. Naude, 2020. "Fragmentation Versus Convergence of Consumer Law Within One Legal System and Across Legal Systems: An African Perspective," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 11-33, March.
    10. Edward Castronova, 2008. "A Test of the Law of Demand in a Virtual World: Exploring the Petri Dish Approach to Social Science," CESifo Working Paper Series 2355, CESifo.
    11. Sousa, Yannick Ferreira De & Munro, Alistair, 2012. "Truck, barter and exchange versus the endowment effect: Virtual field experiments in an online game environment," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 482-493.
    12. Olivier Hueber, 2011. "Innovation in virtual social networks: the widespread of new electronic currencies and the emergence of a new category of entrepreneurs," International Journal of Transitions and Innovation Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(2), pages 163-174.
    13. Mildenberger, Carl David & Pietri, Antoine, 2018. "How does size matter for military success? Evidence from virtual worlds," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 137-155.
    14. Tomáš Lechner, 2013. "Ekonomické dopady implementace ICT ve veřejné správě: důkazy z České republiky [Economic Impacts of ICT Implementation in Public Administration: Evidence from the Czech Republic]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2013(5), pages 675-690.
    15. Ziliang Deng & Peter W Liesch & Zeyu Wang, 2021. "Deceptive signaling on globalized digital platforms: Institutional hypnosis and firm internationalization," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(6), pages 1096-1120, August.
    16. Ifedolapo Helen Babalola & Clinton Ohis Aigbavboa, 2022. "Evaluating Communication Features of Human Resource Management Practices: The Construction Industry in Lagos State, Nigeria," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-15, October.
    17. Sascha Fullbrunn & Katharina Richwien & Abdolkarim Sadrieh, 2011. "Trust and Trustworthiness in Anonymous Virtual Worlds," Journal of Media Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 48-63.
    18. Giampiero E.G. Beroggi, 2003. "Internet Multiattribute Group Decision Support in Electronic Commerce," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 12(6), pages 481-499, November.
    19. Mohamed Khalifa & RonChi-Wai Kwok & Robert Davison, 2002. "The Effects of Process and Content Facilitation Restrictiveness on GSS-Mediated Collaborative Learning," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 11(5), pages 345-361, September.
    20. Karim Gassemi, 2019. "Collective Strategy Formulation: An Experimental Research Assessing the Positive Impact of Group Decision Support System on Work Group," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 9(5), pages 150-157.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-02401194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.