IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-04319834.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La concentration des marchés d'armement

Author

Listed:
  • Sylvain Moura

    (Ministère des armées)

Abstract

Les concentrations industrielles des années 1990 ont réduit le nombre d'offreurs sur les marchés d'armement [Hébert et Nardon, 1999]. Pour autant, le phénomène demeure mal mesuré. Faute de données exhaustives, les études basées sur le Defense News Top 100 ou le SIPRI Top 100 détaillent l'évolution du chiffre d'affaires militaire seulement pour les principaux contractants mondiaux. Ce faisant, elles ne proposent pas d'évaluation de la concentration de marché au niveau national, ni sur les parts de marché des fournisseurs de taille plus modeste (qui possèdent des savoir-faire utilisés dans la chaîne de production d'armement). Quant aux études réalisées à partir des bases achats des ministères de la défense, leur champ peut apparaître inadapté. Cet Ecodef propose, dans ce contexte, un point de situation sur le degré de concentration des marchés d'armement passés par le ministère de la Défense français en 2011. La première section rappelle les raisons pour lesquelles les marchés d'armement tendent vers une structure oligopolistique (concentration des offreurs). La deuxième section expose la méthode de calcul de la concentration. Les résultats sont présentés dans la troisième section.

Suggested Citation

  • Sylvain Moura, 2013. "La concentration des marchés d'armement," Post-Print halshs-04319834, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-04319834
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-04319834
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-04319834/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Cortade & Edmond Baranes, 2007. "Fusions horizontales sur le marché de l'Internet," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 178(2), pages 67-77.
    2. Keith Hartley & Todd Sandler (ed.), 2007. "Handbook of Defense Economics," Handbook of Defense Economics, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 2, number 1.
    3. Nathalie Lazaric & Valerie Merindol & Sylvie Rochhia, 2011. "Changes in the French Defence Innovation System: New Roles and Capabilities for the Government Agency for Defence," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 509-530.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghodsi, Mahdi & Karamelikli, Huseyin, 2022. "The Impact of Sanctions Imposed by the European Union against Iran on their Bilateral Trade: General versus Targeted Sanctions," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 33-58, February.
    2. Keith Hartley & Peter MacDonald, 2010. "Country Survey Xxi: The United Kingdom," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 43-63.
    3. Sylvain Moura, 2018. "La R&D militaire : le lien Industrie-État," Post-Print halshs-04291881, HAL.
    4. Darrell J. Glaser & Ahmed S. Rahman, 2017. "Development and Retention of Human Capital in Large Bureaucracies," Departmental Working Papers 60, United States Naval Academy Department of Economics.
    5. George Tridimas, 2010. "Constitutional judicial review and political insurance," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 81-101, February.
    6. Hall Abigail R., 2015. "Drones: Public Interest, Public Choice, and the Expansion of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 21(2), pages 273-300, April.
    7. Stergios Skaperdas, 2011. "The costs of organized violence: a review of the evidence," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, March.
    8. Sanjeev Goyal & Adrien Vigier, 2014. "Attack, Defence, and Contagion in Networks," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 81(4), pages 1518-1542.
    9. repec:zbw:rwirep:0270 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Bayer, Péter & Herings, P. Jean-Jacques & Peeters, Ronald, 2021. "Farsighted manipulation and exploitation in networks," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    11. M. Christian Lehmann, 2022. "Fairness preferences as a cause of inefficient war," Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics (SABE), vol. 6(1), pages 33-36, December.
    12. John R. Boyce & David M. Bruner, 2009. "Good Fences Make Good Neighbors: Endogenous Property Rights in a Game of Conflict," Working Papers 09-05, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.
    13. Martin Philipp Heger & Eric Neumayer, 2022. "Economic legacy effects of armed conflict: Insights from the civil war in Aceh, Indonesia," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 39(4), pages 394-421, July.
    14. Mehrdad Vahabi, 2011. "Appropriation, violent enforcement, and transaction costs: a critical survey," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 227-253, April.
    15. Glaser, Darrell & Rahman, Ahmed, 2015. "Human Capital on the High Seas - Job Mobility and Returns to Technical Skill During Industrialization," MPRA Paper 68351, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Nicolò Bellanca & Stefani Innocenti, 2013. "Not-dividing the Indivisible: Formation of the Sacred and Antagonistic Conflicts," Working Papers - Economics wp2013_10.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    17. Hoffmann, Magnus & Rota-Graziosi, Grégoire, 2012. "Endogenous timing in general rent-seeking and conflict models," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 168-184.
    18. Sourav Bhattacharya & Joyee Deb & Tapas Kundu, 2015. "Mobility and Conflict," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 7(1), pages 281-319, February.
    19. Luis Corchón & Matthias Dahm, 2010. "Foundations for contest success functions," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 43(1), pages 81-98, April.
    20. Mirkina, Irina, 2018. "FDI and sanctions: An empirical analysis of short- and long-run effects," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 198-225.
    21. Mehrdad Vahabi, 2011. "The Economics of Destructive Power," Chapters, in: Derek L. Braddon & Keith Hartley (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Conflict, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-04319834. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.