IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-02188803.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Les enjeux des environnements big data pour la Police Nationale

Author

Listed:
  • Jordan Vazquez

    (UJML - Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 - Université de Lyon)

  • Cécile Godé

    (CRET-LOG - Centre de Recherche sur le Transport et la Logistique - AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

  • Jean-Fabrice Lebraty

    (UJML - Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 - Université de Lyon)

Abstract

Comme le démontrent Godé et Vazquez (Godé & Vazquez, 2017) les effectifs de la Police Nationale Française agissent au sein de contextes extrêmes, simultanément marqués par de hauts niveaux de changement, d'incertitude et de risques principalement vitaux, matériels et juridiques (Godé, 2016), mais aussi technologiques. Ainsi, dans ce contexte spécifique la notion de big data, est susceptible d'affecter le processus de prise de décision des policiers. La question que nous posons ici est la suivante « Quelle est la place de l'intuition dans le processus décisionnel en environnement big data ? ». Dans cette recherche exploratoire, nous exposons alors comment l'explosion des volumes d'informations disponibles, la grande diversité de leurs sources (réseaux sociaux, sites web, objets connectés), leur rapidité de diffusion (en temps réel ou quasi temps réel) et leur caractère non structuré (Davenport & Soulard, 2014) lancent de nouveaux défis décisionnels aux forces de la Police Nationale.

Suggested Citation

  • Jordan Vazquez & Cécile Godé & Jean-Fabrice Lebraty, 2017. "Les enjeux des environnements big data pour la Police Nationale," Post-Print halshs-02188803, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02188803
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02188803
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02188803/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cécile Godé & J.B. Lebraty, 2015. "Experience feedback as an enabler of coordination: An aerobatic military team case. Vol. 31, N°3, pp. 324-336," Post-Print hal-02127822, HAL.
    2. Gary Klein, 1999. "Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262611465, April.
    3. Godé, Cécile & Lebraty, Jean-Fabrice, 2015. "Experience feedback as an enabler of coordination: An aerobatic military team case," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 424-436.
    4. Jean-Fabrice Lebraty & Jacques Lebraty, 2010. "Décision en situation, holisme et complexité," Post-Print halshs-00545790, HAL.
    5. Isabelle Bouty & Cécile Godé & Carole Drucker-Godard & Pascal Lièvre & Jean Nizet & François Pichault, 2012. "Coordination Practices in Extreme Situations," Post-Print hal-01625226, HAL.
    6. Robert J. B. Hutton & Gary Klein, 1999. "Expert decision making," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(1), pages 32-45.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jordan Vazquez & Cécile Godé & Jean-Fabrice Lebraty, 2018. "Environnement big data et décision : l'étape de contre la montre du tour de France 2017," Post-Print halshs-02188793, HAL.
    2. Jordan Vazquez & Cécile Godé & Jean-Fabrice Lebraty, 2021. "Environnement big data et prise de décision : maintien de l'ordre durant un évènement sportif d'ampleur," Post-Print hal-03252399, HAL.
    3. Lenesley Pauline & Cécile Godé & Valérie Buthion, 2017. "Teams Coordination In A Polycentric System: Insights From Pre-Hospital Emergency Teams," Post-Print hal-01531144, HAL.
    4. Virginie Fernandez & Yvonne Giordano & Sabrina Loufrani-Fedida, 2017. "Enacting resilience in extreme action teams: The case of French mountain rescue organizing," Post-Print hal-02046087, HAL.
    5. Lea Kiwan & Nathalie Lazaric, 2019. "Learning a new ecology of space and looking for new routines: Experimenting robotics in a surgical team," Post-Print hal-02559098, HAL.
    6. Tim Rakow & Charles Vincent & Kate Bull & Nigel Harvey, 2005. "Assessing the Likelihood of an Important Clinical Outcome: New Insights from a Comparison of Clinical and Actuarial Judgment," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 25(3), pages 262-282, May.
    7. David Williams, 2014. "Models, Metaphors and Symbols for Information and Knowledge Systems," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 10(1), pages 79-107.
    8. Kim, Jong Hyun & Seong, Poong Hyun, 2007. "The effect of information types on diagnostic strategies in the information aid," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 171-186.
    9. Pichault, Francois & Fatien Diochon, Pauline & Nizet, Jean, 2020. "Autonomy of independent professionals: A political process perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 623-633.
    10. Mike Metcalfe, 2013. "A Pragmatic System of Decision Criteria," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 56-64, January.
    11. Betsch, Tilmann & Haberstroh, Susanne & Molter, Beate & Glockner, Andreas, 2004. "Oops, I did it again--relapse errors in routinized decision making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 62-74, January.
    12. Lorko, Matej & Servátka, Maroš & Zhang, Le, 2019. "How to Improve the Accuracy of Project Schedules? The Effect of Project Specification and Historical Information on Duration Estimates," MPRA Paper 95585, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Jan Hayes & Sarah Maslen, 2015. "Knowing stories that matter: learning for effective safety decision-making," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 714-726, June.
    14. Jordan Vazquez & Cécile Godé & Jean-Fabrice Lebraty, 2019. "Environnement big data et prise de décision intuitive : le cas de la Police Nationale des Bouches du Rhône," Post-Print halshs-02188451, HAL.
    15. Peecher, Mark E. & Solomon, Ira & Trotman, Ken T., 2013. "An accountability framework for financial statement auditors and related research questions," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 596-620.
    16. Andersson, Patric & Engelberg, Elisabeth, 2006. "Affective and rational consumer choice modes: The role of intuition, analytical decision-making, and attitudes to money," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration 2006:13, Stockholm School of Economics.
    17. Clayton Wukich & Scott E. Robinson, 2013. "Leadership Strategies at the Meso Level of Emergency Management Networks," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 41-59, April.
    18. Giampiero E.G. Beroggi, 2003. "Internet Multiattribute Group Decision Support in Electronic Commerce," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 12(6), pages 481-499, November.
    19. Padraig MacNeela & Anne Scott & Pearl Treacy & Abbey Hyde, 2010. "In the know: cognitive and social factors in mental health nursing assessment," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(9‐10), pages 1298-1306, May.
    20. Greg Fisher & Emily Neubert, 2023. "Evaluating Ventures Fast and Slow: Sensemaking, Intuition, and Deliberation in Entrepreneurial Resource Provision Decisions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(4), pages 1298-1326, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02188803. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.