IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v38y2020i4p623-633.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Autonomy of independent professionals: A political process perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Pichault, Francois
  • Fatien Diochon, Pauline
  • Nizet, Jean

Abstract

This article looks into the issue of autonomy, often portrayed as a key feature of modern work arrangements, in particular of Independent professionals (IPros). Given the absence of conclusive evidence in the current debate opposing structural and agency views on autonomy at work, we study how Ipros perform their job referring to three main analytical dimensions: formalization, verticality and openness. Our empirical material is composed of critical incidents reported by 37 executive coaches working in France. We show that IPros’ autonomy unfolds over a 3-phase process combining the three aforementioned dimensions of autonomy that we associate with power strategies. This combination therefore reflects a complex interaction between structural and agentic factors, paving the way for a political process perspective on autonomy. Therefore, our paper advocates combining rather than opposing structural and agentic views on autonomy, and also expands the traditional agentic view of IPros’ autonomy beyond the dominant psychological argument.

Suggested Citation

  • Pichault, Francois & Fatien Diochon, Pauline & Nizet, Jean, 2020. "Autonomy of independent professionals: A political process perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 623-633.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:38:y:2020:i:4:p:623-633
    DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2019.12.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237319301513
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.emj.2019.12.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boutinot, Amélie & Mangematin, Vincent, 2013. "Surfing on institutions: When temporary actors in organizational fields respond to institutional pressures," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 626-641.
    2. Kalleberg, Arne L. & Nesheim, Torstein & Olsen, Karen M., 2015. "Job quality in triadic employment relations: Work attitudes of Norwegian temporary help agency employees," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 362-374.
    3. Hanisch, Bastian & Wald, Andreas, 2014. "Effects of complexity on the success of temporary organizations: Relationship quality and transparency as substitutes for formal coordination mechanisms," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 197-213.
    4. Isabelle Bouty & Cécile Godé & Carole Drucker-Godard & Pascal Lièvre & Jean Nizet & François Pichault, 2012. "Coordination Practices in Extreme Situations," Post-Print hal-01625226, HAL.
    5. Christelle Havard & Brigitte Rorive & André Sobczak, 2009. "Client, employer and employee: Mapping a complex triangulation," Post-Print hal-00771101, HAL.
    6. Samer Faraj & Yan Xiao, 2006. "Coordination in Fast-Response Organizations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(8), pages 1155-1169, August.
    7. Alfred Kleinknecht & Zenlin Kwee & Lilyana Budyanto, 2016. "Rigidities through flexibility: flexible labour and the rise of management bureaucracies," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 40(4), pages 1137-1147.
    8. Amélie Boutinot & Vincent Mangematin, 2013. "Surfing on institutions: When temporary actors in organizational fields respond to institutional pressures," Post-Print hal-00665213, HAL.
    9. Anna Soru & Elena Sinibaldi & Cristina Zanni, 2019. "Working conditions and needs: results of a European survey," Chapters, in: Renata Semenza & François Pichault (ed.), The Challenges of Self-Employment in Europe, chapter 3, pages 47-76, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Wynn, Michael T, 2016. "Chameleons at large: Entrepreneurs, employees and firms – the changing context of employment relationships," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(6), pages 826-842, November.
    11. Alvesson, Mats & Kärreman, Dan & Sturdy, Andrew & Handley, Karen, 2009. "Unpacking the client(s): Constructions, positions and client-consultant dynamics," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 253-263, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elbasha, Tamim & Avetisyan, Emma, 2018. "A framework to study strategizing activities at the field level: The example of CSR rating agencies," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 38-46.
    2. Virginie Fernandez & Yvonne Giordano & Sabrina Loufrani-Fedida, 2017. "Enacting resilience in extreme action teams: The case of French mountain rescue organizing," Post-Print hal-02046087, HAL.
    3. Jan-Kees Schakel & Paul C. van Fenema & Samer Faraj, 2016. "Shots Fired! Switching Between Practices in Police Work," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 391-410, April.
    4. Lenesley Pauline & Cécile Godé & Valérie Buthion, 2017. "Teams Coordination In A Polycentric System: Insights From Pre-Hospital Emergency Teams," Post-Print hal-01531144, HAL.
    5. Godé, Cécile & Lebraty, Jean-Fabrice, 2015. "Experience feedback as an enabler of coordination: An aerobatic military team case," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 424-436.
    6. Huigang Liang & Nianxin Wang & Yajiong Xue & Shilun Ge, 2017. "Unraveling the Alignment Paradox: How Does Business—IT Alignment Shape Organizational Agility?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 863-879, December.
    7. Virginie Xhauflair & Benjamin Huybrechts & François Pichault, 2018. "How Can New Players Establish Themselves in Highly Institutionalized Labour Markets? A Belgian Case Study in the Area of Project†Based Work," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 56(2), pages 370-394, June.
    8. Gerald C. Kane & Jeremiah Johnson & Ann Majchrzak, 2014. "Emergent Life Cycle: The Tension Between Knowledge Change and Knowledge Retention in Open Online Coproduction Communities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(12), pages 3026-3048, December.
    9. Jordan Vazquez & Cécile Godé & Jean-Fabrice Lebraty, 2018. "Environnement big data et décision : l'étape de contre la montre du tour de France 2017," Post-Print halshs-02188793, HAL.
    10. Catherine Durnell Cramton & Tine Köhler & Raymond E. Levitt, 0. "Using scripts to address cultural and institutional challenges of global project coordination," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 0, pages 1-22.
    11. Rajneesh Chowdhury, 2023. "Methodological Flexibility in Systems Thinking: Musings from the Standpoint of a Systems Consultant," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 59-86, February.
    12. Margherita, Alessandro & Elia, Gianluca & Klein, Mark, 2021. "Managing the COVID-19 emergency: A coordination framework to enhance response practices and actions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    13. Wex, Felix & Schryen, Guido & Feuerriegel, Stefan & Neumann, Dirk, 2014. "Emergency response in natural disaster management: Allocation and scheduling of rescue units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 697-708.
    14. Bögenhold, Dieter & Klinglmair, Robert & Kandutsch, Florian, 2018. "Self-employment on the way in a digital economy: A variety of shades of grey," MPRA Paper 85321, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Goh, Shao Hung & Eldridge, Stephen, 2019. "Sales and Operations Planning: The effect of coordination mechanisms on supply chain performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 80-94.
    16. Cécile Godé & Pierre Barbaroux, 2016. "Combining Technologies’ Properties to Cope with Uncertainty: Lessons from the Military," Post-Print hal-03223680, HAL.
    17. Matthieu Lauras & Frédérick Benaben & Sébastien Truptil & Aurélie Charles, 2015. "Event-cloud platform to support decision-making in emergency management," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 857-869, August.
    18. Salman Nazir & Brad Price & Nanda C. Surendra & Katherine Kopp, 2022. "Adapting agile development practices for hyper-agile environments: lessons learned from a COVID-19 emergency response research project," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 193-211, September.
    19. Ciaran Heavey & Zeki Simsek, 2015. "Transactive Memory Systems and Firm Performance: An Upper Echelons Perspective," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 941-959, August.
    20. Spanuth, Thomas & Wald, Andreas, 2017. "Understanding the antecedents of organizational commitment in the context of temporary organizations: An empirical study," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 129-138.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:38:y:2020:i:4:p:623-633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.