IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04292962.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cooperative associations: frameworks of distributed leadership for collective digital innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Louis Cousin

    (LITEM - Laboratoire en Innovation, Technologies, Economie et Management (EA 7363) - UEVE - Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne - Université Paris-Saclay - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris], ULaval - Université Laval [Québec], UEVE - Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne)

  • Luc K. Audebrand

    (ULaval - Université Laval [Québec])

Abstract

Digital innovation and transformation have been mainly studied at the level of a single organization: in the cooperative movement, platform cooperative have triggered a lot of attention, with exciting studies about the potentials and limitations about how a digital platform can integrate into a cooperative governance. However, digital innovation at the level of a group of cooperatives, such as automated data-sharing systems, has remained (to our knowledge) unexplored, leaving scholars and practitioners with poor knowledge and material to support a large-scale digital transition of the cooperative movement. This paper aims at contributing to fill this gap by studying how a group of cooperatives or social economy organizations can collectively take leadership over a digital project within the framework of a meta-organization more commonly known as a cooperative association or umbrella organization. To do so, we shaped a theoretical model mobilizing the emerging theory of meta-organizations (Ahrne & Brunsson, 2005) together with concept of distributed leadership (Huxham & Vangen, 2000), and conducted a preliminary qualitative study based on two cases in Quebec. This enables us to identify configurations preventing or supporting the emergence of collective digital projects, by taking into account characteristics of both the meta-organization and its members. We believe that such findings could open a new stream of research on cooperatives adopting interorganizational collaboration as a unit of analysis, and help cooperative practitioners in conducting complex data-sharing innovations.

Suggested Citation

  • Louis Cousin & Luc K. Audebrand, 2023. "Cooperative associations: frameworks of distributed leadership for collective digital innovation," Post-Print hal-04292962, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04292962
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04292962v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04292962v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susan V. Scott & Markos Zachariadis, 2012. "Origins and development of SWIFT, 1973--2009," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(3), pages 462-482, June.
    2. Tassey, Gregory, 2000. "Standardization in technology-based markets," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(4-5), pages 587-602, April.
    3. Sergi, Viviane & Denis, Jean-Louis & Langley, Ann, 2012. "Opening Up Perspectives on Plural Leadership," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(4), pages 403-407, December.
    4. Ahrne, Göran & Brunsson, Nils, 2005. "Organizations and meta-organizations," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 429-449, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marullo, Cristina & Ahn, Joon Mo, 2024. "Knowledge tensions and decision-making challenges in open innovation: Standardization as a de-biasing mechanism," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    2. Christoph March & Ina Schieferdecker, 2021. "Technological Sovereignty as Ability, Not Autarky," CESifo Working Paper Series 9139, CESifo.
    3. Héloïse Berkowitz & Nils Brunsson & Michael Grothe-Hammer & Mikaela Sundberg & Bertrand Valiorgue, 2022. "Meta-Organizations: A Clarification and a Way Forward," Post-Print hal-03685386, HAL.
    4. Shabnam A. Shaikh & Anna-Maija Lämsä & Suvi Heikkinen, 2023. "Collaborative Leadership in the Institution of Higher Education: A Sociocultural Context of Pakistan," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 12(1), pages 65-80, April.
    5. Xie, Zongjie & Hall, Jeremy & McCarthy, Ian P. & Skitmore, Martin & Shen, Liyin, 2016. "Standardization efforts: The relationship between knowledge dimensions, search processes and innovation outcomes," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 48, pages 69-78.
    6. Heloïse Berkowitz & Marcelo Bucheli & Hervé Dumez, 2017. "Collectively Designing CSR Through Meta-Organizations: A Case Study of the Oil and Gas Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(4), pages 753-769, July.
    7. Michael Grothe-Hammer & Héloïse Berkowitz & Olivier Berthod, 2022. "Decisional organization theory: towards an integrated framework of organization," Post-Print hal-03699112, HAL.
    8. Jane Phuong & Pia Rowe & Ann Lawless, 2023. "Navigating the river: Experiences of women academic leaders in Vietnam," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 48(4), pages 754-768, November.
    9. Martin Behrens & Markus Helfen, 2016. "The Foundations of Social Partnership," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 54(2), pages 334-357, June.
    10. Gawer, Annabelle, 2014. "Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1239-1249.
    11. Jussi Heikkilä & Timo Ali-Vehmas & Julius Rissanen, 2021. "The Link Between Standardization and Economic Growth: A Bibliometric Analysis," International Journal of Standardization Research (IJSR), IGI Global, vol. 19(1), pages 1-25, January.
    12. Banerjee, Anup & Carlsson-Wall, Martin & Nordqvist, Mattias, 2024. "Hybrid board governance: Exploring the challenges in implementing social impact measurements," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(5).
    13. Bowns, Steven & Bradley, Ian & Knee, Paula & Williams, Fiona & Williams, Geoffrey, 2003. "Measuring the economic benefits from R&D: improvements in the MMI model of the United Kingdom National Measurement System," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 991-1002, June.
    14. Wiegmann, Paul Moritz & de Vries, Henk J. & Blind, Knut, 2017. "Multi-mode standardisation: A critical review and a research agenda," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1370-1386.
    15. Jane Webb, 2017. "Keeping Alive Inter-Organisational Innovation Through Identity Work And Play," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(05), pages 1-22, June.
    16. Jennifer Saniossian, 2020. "Co-évolution durant la création des méta-organisations multi-parties prenantes : influence sur les enjeux sociaux de territoire," Post-Print hal-04654634, HAL.
    17. Evan Falkenthal & Andrew M. Byrne, 2021. "Distributed Leadership in Collegiate Esports," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 52(2), pages 185-203, April.
    18. Shiu, Jing-Ming & Dallas, Mark P. & Huang, Hui-Hsuan, 2023. "A friend of a friend? Informal authority, social capital, and networks in telecommunications standard-setting organizations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    19. Orelj, Ana & Torfason, Magnus Thor, 2022. "They didn't ask: Online innovation communities as a latent dynamic capability," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    20. Benjamin Bürbaumer, 2021. "The Limits of Traditional Bargaining under Deep Integration: TTIP Stumbling over Technical Barriers to Trade," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1069-1085, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cooperatives; Leadership; Innovation; Digital transition; Digital Innovation; Distributed Leadership; Meta-Organization; Cooperative Association; Social Economy;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04292962. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.