IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01991313.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Collaborating across the researcher-practitioner divide: introducing John Dewey's democratic experimentalism

Author

Listed:
  • Linh-Chi Vo

    (Métis Lab EM Normandie - EM Normandie - École de Management de Normandie)

  • Mihaela Kelemen

    (Keele University [Keele])

Abstract

An analysis of bridging the gap between researchers and practitioners shows that democratic experimentalism offers a much needed platform for a collaborative relationship between academics and practitioners that leads to knowledge that is rigorous and relevant to practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Linh-Chi Vo & Mihaela Kelemen, 2017. "Collaborating across the researcher-practitioner divide: introducing John Dewey's democratic experimentalism," Post-Print hal-01991313, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01991313
    DOI: 10.1108/JOCM-03-2016-0054
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://normandie-univ.hal.science/hal-01991313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://normandie-univ.hal.science/hal-01991313/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JOCM-03-2016-0054?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alfred Kieser & Lars Leiner, 2009. "Why the Rigour–Relevance Gap in Management Research Is Unbridgeable," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 516-533, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicholas J. Rowland & Matthew J. Spaniol, 2022. "The strategic conversation, 25 years later: A retrospective review of Kees van der Heijden's Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(1), March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Norbert Bol, 2011. "Co-Creation of Value In Real Estate Investments," ERES eres2011_168, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    2. Jacqueline Fendt, 2013. "Lost in Translation? On Mind and Matter in Management Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(2), pages 21582440134, May.
    3. Wenzel, Matthias & Will, Matthias Georg, 2019. "The communicative constitution of academic fields in the digital age: The case of CSR," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 517-533.
    4. Julia Olmos Peñuela & Paul Benneworth & Elena Castro-Martínez, 2018. "Does usable research face higher obstacles within the academy?," CHEPS Working Papers 201805, University of Twente, Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS).
    5. Jesús de Frutos-Belizón & Fernando Martín-Alcázar & Gonzalo Sánchez-Gardey, 2021. "The research–practice gap in the field of HRM: a qualitative study from the academic side of the gap," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 1465-1515, August.
    6. Gupta, Nitish & Park, Hyunkyu & Phaal, Rob, 2022. "The portfolio planning, implementing, and governing process: An inductive approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    7. Timothy Clark & Mike Wright, 2009. "So, Farewell Then . . . Reflections on Editing the Journal of Management Studies," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 1-9, January.
    8. Eden, Colin & Ackermann, Fran, 2018. "Theory into practice, practice to theory: Action research in method development," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 1145-1155.
    9. Christopher Wickert & Corinne Post & Jonathan P. Doh & John E. Prescott & Andrea Prencipe, 2021. "Management Research that Makes a Difference: Broadening the Meaning of Impact," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 297-320, March.
    10. Thomaz Wood & Edvalter Becker Holz & Renato Souza, 2023. "When Rigor Meets Relevance: the Development of Hybrid Actionable Knowledge Production Systems," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 1-29, February.
    11. Bullinger, Bernadette & Kieser, Alfred & Schiller-Merkens, Simone, 2015. "Coping with institutional complexity: Responses of management scholars to competing logics in the field of management studies," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 437-450.
    12. Roth, Steffen & Schwede, Peter & Valentinov, Vladislav & Pérez-Valls, Miguel & Kaivo-oja, Jari, 2020. "Harnessing big data for a multifunctional theory of the firm," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 54-61.
    13. Jesus de Frutos-Belizon & Fernando Martin-Alcazar & Gonzalo Sanchez-Gardey, 2018. "The Research-Practice Gap in Management Field: A Relational Approach Based on the Quintuple Helix Model," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(6), pages 52-60, November.
    14. Amara, Nabil & Olmos-Peñuela, Julia & Fernández-de-Lucio, Ignacio, 2019. "Overcoming the “lost before translation” problem: An exploratory study," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 22-36.
    15. Harrington Denis & Short Jeremy C. & Hynes Briga, 2015. "Changing times for management educators: Rethinking engagement with participatory forms of knowledge production," The Irish Journal of Management, Sciendo, vol. 34(1), pages 51-59, December.
    16. Marco Gatti, 2018. "The Impact of Management Accounting Research: An Analysis of the Past and a Look at the Future," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(5), pages 1-47, March.
    17. Schiele, Holger & Krummaker, Stefan, 2011. "Consortium benchmarking: Collaborative academic-practitioner case study research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(10), pages 1137-1145, October.
    18. Vineet Kaushik & Shobha Tewari, 2023. "Modeling Opportunity Indicators Fostering Social Entrepreneurship: A Hybrid Delphi and Best-Worst Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 667-698, August.
    19. Corinne Bendersky & Kathleen L. McGinn, 2010. "Perspective---Open to Negotiation: Phenomenological Assumptions and Knowledge Dissemination," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 781-797, June.
    20. Schiele, Holger & Krummaker, Stefan & Hoffmann, Petra & Kowalski, Rita, 2022. "The “research world café” as method of scientific enquiry: Combining rigor with relevance and speed," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 280-296.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01991313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.