IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/v4su8_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Balancing continuity and novelty: The practical relevance of management research from the practitioners' perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Splitter, Violetta

Abstract

In management research, the literature on practical relevance holds that practitioners actively construct practical relevance. However, the practitioners' perspective on relevance has received very little scholarly attention to date. This paper puts forward a theoretical model for examining how practitioners construct academic knowledge as practically relevant based on interviews with practitioners enrolled on executive MBA (EMBA) courses. The model shows that practitioners construct academic knowledge as relevant by (1) perceiving it as congruent with their context, experiences and intuition, (2) extending their knowledge by new instruments, constructs, and means of scientific framing and (3) reconnecting it to their contexts and professional practices. This model extends the literature by showing that, in order to be considered practically relevant, academic knowledge needs to balance novelty and continuity. Additionally, the paper shows that practitioners are unlikely to perceive as relevant ambiguous academic knowledge that is 'action expansive', i.e. that presents them with an overwhelming range of possible actions.

Suggested Citation

  • Splitter, Violetta, 2019. "Balancing continuity and novelty: The practical relevance of management research from the practitioners' perspective," SocArXiv v4su8_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:v4su8_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/v4su8_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5c5c48d6832ca60017ad90a6/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/v4su8_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Markus Reitzig & Phanish Puranam, 2009. "Value appropriation as an organizational capability: the case of IP protection through patents," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 765-789, July.
    2. C. Gopinath & Richard C. Hoffman, 1995. "The Relevance of Strategy Research: Practitioner and Academic Viewpoints," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(5), pages 575-594, September.
    3. W. Chan Kim & Renée A. Mauborgne, 1995. "A Procedural Justice Model of Strategic Decision Making: Strategy Content Implications in the Multinational," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 44-61, February.
    4. David C. Baldridge & Steven W. Floyd & Lívia Markóczy, 2004. "Are managers from Mars and academicians from venus? Toward an understanding of the relationship between academic quality and practical relevance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(11), pages 1063-1074, November.
    5. Geroski, Paul, 2003. "The Evolution of New Markets," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199248896.
    6. Alfred Kieser & Lars Leiner, 2009. "Why the Rigour–Relevance Gap in Management Research Is Unbridgeable," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 516-533, May.
    7. Eero Vaara & Eric Faÿ, 2012. "Reproduction and Change on the Global Scale : A Bourdieusian Perspective on Management Education," Post-Print hal-02312973, HAL.
    8. H. Igor Ansoff, 1980. "Strategic issue management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(2), pages 131-148, April.
    9. John Seely Brown & Paul Duguid, 1991. "Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 40-57, February.
    10. Richard Whitley, 1984. "The Scientific Status Of Management Research As A Practically‐Oriented Social Science," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(4), pages 369-390, October.
    11. Jean-Louis Denis & Geneviève Dompierre & Ann Langley & Linda Rouleau, 2011. "Escalating Indecision: Between Reification and Strategic Ambiguity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 225-244, February.
    12. Eero Vaara & Eric Faÿ, 2012. "Reproduction and Change on the Global Scale: A Bourdieusian Perspective on Management Education," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(6), pages 1023-1051, September.
    13. Jarzabkowski, Paula & Wilson, David C., 2006. "Actionable Strategy Knowledge:: A Practice Perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 348-367, October.
    14. Linda Rouleau, 2005. "Micro‐Practices of Strategic Sensemaking and Sensegiving: How Middle Managers Interpret and Sell Change Every Day," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(7), pages 1413-1441, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Splitter, Violetta, 2019. "Balancing continuity and novelty: The practical relevance of management research from the practitioners' perspective," SocArXiv v4su8, Center for Open Science.
    2. Eden, Colin & Ackermann, Fran, 2018. "Theory into practice, practice to theory: Action research in method development," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 1145-1155.
    3. Elisa Alt & Justin B. Craig, 2016. "Selling Issues with Solutions: Igniting Social Intrapreneurship in for-Profit Organizations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(5), pages 794-820, July.
    4. M.-J. Avenier & J. Bartunek, 2010. "Bridging a supposedly unbridgeable gap: elaborating scientific knowledge from and for practice," Post-Print halshs-00526745, HAL.
    5. Pär Mårtensson & Uno Fors & Emelie Fröberg & Udo Zander & Gunnar H Nilsson, 2019. "Quality of Research Practice – An interdisciplinary face validity evaluation of a quality model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Jacques-Bernard Gauthier & Lavagnon Ika, 2022. "The rigor-relevance gap in Project Management research: It's time to stop the lament and think and act reflexively," Working Papers hal-03563085, HAL.
    7. Ericson, Mona, 2014. "On the dynamics of fluidity and open-endedness of strategy process toward a strategy-as-practicing conceptualization," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 1-15.
    8. Warmelink, Harald & Koivisto, Jonna & Mayer, Igor & Vesa, Mikko & Hamari, Juho, 2020. "Gamification of production and logistics operations: Status quo and future directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 331-340.
    9. Gary T. Burke & Carola Wolf, 2021. "The Process Affordances of Strategy Toolmaking when Addressing Wicked Problems," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 359-388, March.
    10. Jerzy Kociatkiewicz & Monika Kostera & Anna Zueva, 2022. "The ghost of capitalism: a guide to seeing, naming and exorcising the spectre haunting the business school," Post-Print hal-03212379, HAL.
    11. Wenzel, Matthias & Will, Matthias Georg, 2019. "The communicative constitution of academic fields in the digital age: The case of CSR," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 517-533.
    12. Bullinger, Bernadette & Kieser, Alfred & Schiller-Merkens, Simone, 2015. "Coping with institutional complexity: Responses of management scholars to competing logics in the field of management studies," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 437-450.
    13. Vineet Kaushik & Shobha Tewari, 2023. "Modeling Opportunity Indicators Fostering Social Entrepreneurship: A Hybrid Delphi and Best-Worst Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 667-698, August.
    14. Schiele, Holger & Krummaker, Stefan & Hoffmann, Petra & Kowalski, Rita, 2022. "The “research world café” as method of scientific enquiry: Combining rigor with relevance and speed," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 280-296.
    15. Philippe Monin & Niels Noorderhaven & Eero Vaara & David Kroon, 2013. "Giving Sense to and Making Sense of Justice in Postmerger Integration," Post-Print hal-02276708, HAL.
    16. Mahmoudi, Fahimeh & Bagheri Majd, Rouhollah, 2021. "The effect of lean culture on the reduction of academic corruption by the mediating role of positive organizational politics in higher education," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    17. Roper, Angela & Hodari, Demian, 2015. "Strategy tools: Contextual factors impacting use and usefulness," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1-12.
    18. Duniesky Feitó Madrigal & Alejandro Mungaray Lagarda & Michelle Texis Flores, 2016. "Factors associated with learning management in Mexican micro-entrepreneurs," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, vol. 32(141), pages 381-386, December.
    19. Heyes, Anthony & Lyon, Thomas P. & Martin, Steve, 2018. "Salience games: Private politics when public attention is limited," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 396-410.
    20. Genevieve Musca, 2007. "La construction de compétences dans l'action," Post-Print hal-01517916, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:v4su8_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.