IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fce/doctra/0617.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Offre de travail des mères isolées : retour sur l'introduction de l'allocation de parent isolé en 1976

Author

Listed:

Abstract

L'objet de cet article est d'évaluer l'effet de l'introduction de l'allocation parent isolé longue en 1976, sur l'offre de travail des mères de jeunes enfants. Cette réforme est assimilée à une quasi-expérience permettant d'appliquer la méthode de double différence. Il s'agit de comparer l'évolution du taux d'emploi du groupe d'individus affectés par l'introduction de l'allocation, en l'occurrence les femmes élevant seules un enfant de moins de 3 ans, à celle du taux d'emploi d'un groupe d'individus non affectés mais dont les caractéristiques sont proches de celles des premiers. Nous proposons deux groupes témoins : le premier comprend les mères d'enfants de moins 3 ans mais qui ne sont pas éligibles à l'API parce qu'elles vivent en couple ; le second est composé des mères isolées dont le plus jeune enfant est âgé de 3 à 5 ans. La différence entre l'évolution du taux d'emploi du groupe test et celle des groupes témoins après 1976, est attribuée à l'introduction de l'API. L'estimation d'un modèle logit permet de contrôler l'effet des différences observables entre le groupe test et chaque groupe témoin.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Yves de Curraize & Hélene Perivier, 2006. "Offre de travail des mères isolées : retour sur l'introduction de l'allocation de parent isolé en 1976," Documents de Travail de l'OFCE 2006-17, Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE).
  • Handle: RePEc:fce:doctra:0617
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ofce.sciences-po.fr/pdf/dtravail/WP2006-17.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hélène Périvier, 2006. "Quel sort pour les allocataires de minima sociaux ?," Post-Print hal-01021145, HAL.
    2. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/3466 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Nada Eissa & Jeffrey B. Liebman, 1996. "Labor Supply Response to the Earned Income Tax Credit," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 111(2), pages 605-637.
    4. Thomas Piketty, 1998. "L'impact des incitations financières au travail sur les comportements individuels : une estimation pour le cas français," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 132(1), pages 1-35.
    5. Marc Gurgand & David Margolis, 2001. "RMI et revenus du travail : une évaluation des gains financiers à l'emploi," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 346(1), pages 103-122.
    6. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/3466 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Cédric Afsa, 1999. "L'allocation de parent isolé : une prestation sous influences. Une analyse de la durée de perception," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 137(1), pages 13-31.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/923 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/923 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Véronique Simonnet & Elisabeth Danzin, 2014. "L'effet du RSA sur le taux de retour à l'emploi des allocataires. Une analyse en double différence selon le nombre et l'âge des enfants," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 467(1), pages 91-116.
    4. Muriel Pucci & Hélène Zajdela, 2004. "Quel loisir pour les allocataires du RMI ? L'arbitrage consommation/loisir revisité," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques r04106, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
    5. Jérôme Gautié & David Margolis, 2009. "Introduction," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 429(1), pages 3-19.
    6. David Spector, 2001. "Emploi : une analyse critique des politiques malthusiennes," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 150(4), pages 13-31.
    7. François Legendre & Jean-Paul Lorgnet & Florence Thibault, 2003. "La distribution des incitations financières au travail en France : l'évaluation du modèle Myriade," Economie & Prévision, La Documentation Française, vol. 0(4), pages 23-48.
    8. Véronique Delarue, 2000. "Le Working Families Tax Credit, un nouveau crédit d'impôt pour les familles de travailleurs à bas revenus au Royaume-Uni," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 335(1), pages 47-61.
    9. Gurgand, Marc & Margolis, David N., 2008. "Does work pay in France? Monetary incentives, hours constraints, and the guaranteed minimum income," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(7), pages 1669-1697, July.
    10. Libertad González, 2008. "Single Mothers, Welfare, and Incentives to Work," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 22(3), pages 447-468, September.
    11. Pierre Cahuc, 2002. "A quoi sert la prime pour l'emploi ?," Revue Française d'Économie, Programme National Persée, vol. 16(3), pages 3-61.
    12. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/923 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Tito Boeri & Jan van Ours, 2013. "The Economics of Imperfect Labor Markets: Second Edition," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 10142.
    14. Yves de Curraize & Hélène Périvier, 2006. "Offre de travail des mères isolées : retour sur l'introduction de l'allocation de parent isolé en 1976," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01053198, HAL.
    15. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/923 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Howard Chernick, 1998. "Fiscal Effects of Block Grants for the Needy: An Interpretation of the Evidence," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 5(2), pages 205-233, May.
    17. Nicole Simpson & Devin Reilly & Kartik Athreya, 2010. "The Earned Income Tax Credit: Insurance Without Disincentives?," 2010 Meeting Papers 1103, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    18. Gabrielle Pepin, 2022. "How Would a Permanently Refundable Child and Dependent Care Credit Affect Eligibility, Benefits, and Incentives?," Public Finance Review, , vol. 50(1), pages 33-61, January.
    19. Marco Francesconi & Wilbert van der Klaauw, 2007. "The Socioeconomic Consequences of "In-Work" Benefit Reform for British Lone Mothers," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 42(1).
    20. Maximilian D. Schmeiser, 2012. "The impact of long‐term participation in the supplemental nutrition assistance program on child obesity," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(4), pages 386-404, April.
    21. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/eu4vqp9ompqllr09hahqkb11m is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Magda Iga & Kiełczewska Aneta & Brandt Nicola, 2020. "The effect of child benefit on female labor supply," IZA Journal of Labor Policy, Sciendo & Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, March.
    23. Ugo Colombino & Nizamul Islam, 2021. "Combining microsimulation and optimization to identify optimal universalistic tax-transfer rule," LISER Working Paper Series 2021-06, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    24. Bargain, Olivier & Orsini, Kristian, 2006. "In-work policies in Europe: Killing two birds with one stone?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 667-697, December.
    25. Charles Gottlieb & Maren Froemel, 2015. "General Equilibrium Effects of Targeted Transfers: The case of EITC," 2015 Meeting Papers 1264, Society for Economic Dynamics.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • J08 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics Policies
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
    • C81 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fce:doctra:0617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Francesco Saraceno (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ofcspfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.