IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mse/wpsorb/r04106.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Quel loisir pour les allocataires du RMI ? L'arbitrage consommation/loisir revisité

Author

Listed:
  • Muriel Pucci

    (DREES)

  • Hélène Zajdela

    (MATISSE et Université d'Evry-Val d'Essonne)

Abstract

In this paper, we build a renewed labour supply model in order to explain why the RMI recipients don't «fall in poverty traps» but on the contrary accept to work even for low wages. The standard consumption-leisure trade-off is extended: we consider that one needs a minimum consumption level that the non-working time can be either leisure time or to idle time. In the standard labour supply model, leisure which enters in the utility function is implicitly defined as the non-working time. This is regrettable since this period of time is not entirely dedicated to pleasant activities. One can «do nothing»: this «non activity» can be modelled as an inferior good. In this "consumption-leisure-idle time" trade-off, labour supply depends on how much the worker can consume over the survival level and on what he does during non-working time. RMI recipients' consumption is close to the survival level and they have not much to spend on leisure: labour supply is inelastic to wage and there are no traps

Suggested Citation

  • Muriel Pucci & Hélène Zajdela, 2004. "Quel loisir pour les allocataires du RMI ? L'arbitrage consommation/loisir revisité," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques r04106, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
    • Handle: RePEc:mse:wpsorb:r04106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: ftp://mse.univ-paris1.fr/pub/mse/cahiers2004/R04106.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernard Gazier & Hélène Zajdela, 2006. ""Making work pay": from justifications to implementations," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques r06073, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
    2. Danièle Guillemot & Patrick Pétour & Hélène Zajdela, 2002. "Trappe à chômage ou trappe à pauvreté. Quel est le sort des allocataires du RMI ?," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 53(6), pages 1235-1252.
    3. Marc Gurgand & David Margolis, 2001. "RMI et revenus du travail : une évaluation des gains financiers à l'emploi," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 346(1), pages 103-122.
    4. François Bourguignon, 2001. "Revenu minimum et redistribution optimale des revenus : fondements théoriques," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 346(1), pages 187-204.
    5. repec:adr:anecst:y:2001:i:63-64:p:01 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Thomas Piketty, 1998. "L'impact des incitations financières au travail sur les comportements individuels : une estimation pour le cas français," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 132(1), pages 1-35.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. François Legendre & Jean-Paul Lorgnet & Florence Thibault, 2003. "La distribution des incitations financières au travail en France : l'évaluation du modèle Myriade," Economie & Prévision, La Documentation Française, vol. 0(4), pages 23-48.
    2. Jérôme Gautié & David Margolis, 2009. "Introduction," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 429(1), pages 3-19.
    3. Yves de Curraize & Hélene Perivier, 2006. "Offre de travail des mères isolées : retour sur l'introduction de l'allocation de parent isolé en 1976," Documents de Travail de l'OFCE 2006-17, Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE).
    4. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/923 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Gurgand, Marc & Margolis, David N., 2008. "Does work pay in France? Monetary incentives, hours constraints, and the guaranteed minimum income," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(7), pages 1669-1697, July.
    6. Libertad González, 2008. "Single Mothers, Welfare, and Incentives to Work," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 22(3), pages 447-468, September.
    7. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/923 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Pierre Cahuc, 2002. "A quoi sert la prime pour l'emploi ?," Revue Française d'Économie, Programme National Persée, vol. 16(3), pages 3-61.
    9. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/eu4vqp9ompqllr09hahqkb11m is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Bargain, Olivier & Orsini, Kristian, 2006. "In-work policies in Europe: Killing two birds with one stone?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 667-697, December.
    11. Hélène Périvier, 2008. "Les femmes sur le marché du travail aux Etats-Unis," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-00973039, HAL.
    12. Bernard Gazier & Hélène Zajdela, 2006. ""Making work pay": from justifications to implementations," Post-Print halshs-00119155, HAL.
    13. Cyrine Hannafi & Rémi Le Gall & François Legendre, 2022. "Recours et non-recours à la prime d’activité : une évaluation en termes de bien-être," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 73(5), pages 841-873.
    14. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/9719 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Borjas, George J. & Edo, Anthony, 2021. "Gender, Selection into Employment, and the Wage Impact of Immigration," IZA Discussion Papers 14261, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Pierre Cahuc & Cette Gilbert & André Zylberberg, 2008. "Salaire minimum et bas revenus," Post-Print halshs-00638149, HAL.
    17. François Bourguignon & Amedeo Spadaro, 2012. "Tax–benefit revealed social preferences," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 10(1), pages 75-108, March.
    18. Philippe Askenazy & Eve Caroli & Jérôme Gautié, 2009. "Un panorama des bas salaires et de la qualité de l'emploi peu qualifié en France," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00567693, HAL.
    19. Hélène Périvier, 2008. "Les femmes sur le marché du travail aux États-Unis," Documents de Travail de l'OFCE 2008-12, Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE).
    20. Bernard Gazier & Hélène Zajdela, 2006. ""Making work pay": from justifications to implementations," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00119155, HAL.
    21. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/5270 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Stancanelli, Elena G.F., 2008. "Evaluating the impact of the French tax credit on the employment rate of women," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(10-11), pages 2036-2047, October.
    23. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/5270 is not listed on IDEAS
    24. Élise Coudin, 2007. "Projections de population active à l'horizon 2050 : des actifs en nombre stable pour une population âgée toujours plus nombreuse," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 408(1), pages 113-136.
    25. Elena Stancanelli, 2006. "Les couples sur le marché de l'emploi," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) hal-03389366, HAL.
    26. Thierry Magnac, 2000. "L'apport de la microéconométrie à l'évaluation des politiques publiques," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 54, pages 89-113.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Unemployment and poverty traps; consumption/leisure trade-off; RMI;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D11 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Theory
    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being
    • J22 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Time Allocation and Labor Supply

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mse:wpsorb:r04106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucie Label (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/msep1fr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.