IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ema/worpap/2021-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Social optimality and stability of matchings in peer-to-peer ridesharing

Author

Listed:
  • Paolo Delle Site
  • André de Palma
  • Samarth Ghoslya

    (CY Cergy Paris Université, THEMA)

Abstract

Peer-to-peer ridesharing, where drivers are also travellers, can alleviate congestion and emissions that plague cities by increasing vehicle occupancy. We propose a socially optimal ridesharing scheme, where a social planner matches passengers and drivers in a way that minimizes travel costs (travel time and fuel) plus environmental costs. The contribution helps in computing the socially optimal ridesharing schemes for networks of any topology within a static framework of route choice with exogenously fixed travel times. A linear programming problem is formulated to compute the optimal matchings. Existence, integrality and uniqueness properties are investigated. The social planner receives a payment from passengers and rewards drivers for the higher costs they bear. Passengers and drivers never incur a loss because travelling alone remains always an option, but matchings may need to be subsidised. The socially optimal matching solution without environmental costs is proved to satisfy the stability property according to which no pair of passenger and driver prefers each other to any of the current partners. In the Sioux Falls network, when 20% of individuals are willing to rideshare, with 80% of passengers travelling by car and 20% by public transport, 17.37% optimally do so, resulting in a 7.05% decrease in CO2 emissions on the all-travel-alone scenario.

Suggested Citation

  • Paolo Delle Site & André de Palma & Samarth Ghoslya, 2021. "Social optimality and stability of matchings in peer-to-peer ridesharing," THEMA Working Papers 2021-17, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
  • Handle: RePEc:ema:worpap:2021-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://thema.u-cergy.fr/IMG/pdf/2021-17.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dong, Zhenning & Leng, Mingming, 2021. "Managing on-demand ridesharing operations: Optimal pricing decisions for a ridesharing platform," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    2. Larry J. Leblanc, 1975. "An Algorithm for the Discrete Network Design Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 183-199, August.
    3. Wang, Xiaolei & Wang, Jun & Guo, Lei & Liu, Wei & Zhang, Xiaoning, 2021. "A convex programming approach for ridesharing user equilibrium under fixed driver/rider demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 33-51.
    4. Mi Diao & Hui Kong & Jinhua Zhao, 2021. "Impacts of transportation network companies on urban mobility," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(6), pages 494-500, June.
    5. Schaller, Bruce, 2021. "Can sharing a ride make for less traffic? Evidence from Uber and Lyft and implications for cities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1-10.
    6. André de Palma & Patrick Stokkink & Nikolas Geroliminis, 2020. "Influence of Dynamic Congestion on Carpooling Matching," THEMA Working Papers 2020-12, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. André de Palma & Lucas Javaudin & Patrick Stokkink & Léandre Tarpin-Pitre, 2021. "Modelling Ridesharing in a Large Network with Dynamic Congestion," THEMA Working Papers 2021-16, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    2. Loa, Patrick & Hossain, Sanjana & Liu, Yicong & Nurul Habib, Khandker, 2022. "How has the COVID-19 pandemic affected the use of ride-sourcing services? An empirical evidence-based investigation for the Greater Toronto Area," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 46-62.
    3. André Palma & Lucas Javaudin & Patrick Stokkink & Léandre Tarpin-Pitre, 2024. "Ride-sharing with inflexible drivers in the Paris metropolitan area," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 963-986, June.
    4. Zhang, Kenan & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2022. "Mitigating traffic congestion induced by transportation network companies: A policy analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 96-118.
    5. Wei, Chong & Asakura, Yasuo & Iryo, Takamasa, 2014. "Formulating the within-day dynamic stochastic traffic assignment problem from a Bayesian perspective," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 45-57.
    6. Wen, Tao & Gao, Qiuya & Chen, Yu-wang & Cheong, Kang Hao, 2022. "Exploring the vulnerability of transportation networks by entropy: A case study of Asia–Europe maritime transportation network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    7. Adam Millard-Ball & Liwei Liu & Whitney Hansen & Drew Cooper & Joe Castiglione, 2023. "Where ridehail drivers go between trips," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(5), pages 1959-1981, October.
    8. Saeed Asadi Bagloee & Majid Sarvi, 2018. "An outer approximation method for the road network design problem," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-28, March.
    9. Ahipaşaoğlu, Selin Damla & Meskarian, Rudabeh & Magnanti, Thomas L. & Natarajan, Karthik, 2015. "Beyond normality: A cross moment-stochastic user equilibrium model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 333-354.
    10. Ong, Felita & Loa, Patrick & Nurul Habib, Khandker, 2024. "Ride-sourcing demand in Metro Vancouver: Looking through the lens of disability," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    11. Joseph Y. J. Chow & Amelia C. Regan, 2011. "Real Option Pricing of Network Design Investments," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(1), pages 50-63, February.
    12. Lim, Yongtaek & Heydecker, Benjamin, 2005. "Dynamic departure time and stochastic user equilibrium assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 97-118, February.
    13. Ospina, Juan P. & Duque, Juan C. & Botero-Fernández, Verónica & Montoya, Alejandro, 2022. "The maximal covering bicycle network design problem," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 222-236.
    14. Yiyuan Wang & Qing Shen, 2024. "A latent class analysis to understand riders’ adoption of on-demand mobility services as a complement to transit," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1043-1061, June.
    15. Maher, Mike, 1998. "Algorithms for logit-based stochastic user equilibrium assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 539-549, November.
    16. Poorzahedy, Hossain & Rouhani, Omid M., 2007. "Hybrid meta-heuristic algorithms for solving network design problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(2), pages 578-596, October.
    17. Wang, Senlei & Correia, Gonçalo Homem de Almeida & Lin, Hai Xiang, 2022. "Modeling the competition between multiple Automated Mobility on-Demand operators: An agent-based approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 605(C).
    18. Zhang, Zhaolin & Zhai, Guocong & Xie, Kun & Xiao, Feng, 2022. "Exploring the nonlinear effects of ridesharing on public transit usage: A case study of San Diego," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    19. Steven E. Shladover, 2022. "Opportunities, Challenges, and Uncertainties in Urban Road Transport Automation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, February.
    20. David Watling, 2002. "A Second Order Stochastic Network Equilibrium Model, II: Solution Method and Numerical Experiments," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 167-183, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    environment; matching stability; optimization; ridesharing; socially optimal matching;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C78 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory
    • R40 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - General
    • R48 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Government Pricing and Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ema:worpap:2021-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Marcassa (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/themafr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.