IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/uctcwp/qt3dt7s30j.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Impacts of Highway Congestion on Freight Operations: Perceptions of Trucking Industry Managers

Author

Listed:
  • Golob, Thomas F.
  • Regan, Amelia C.

Abstract

To better understand how road congestion adversely affects trucking operations in California, we surveyed approximately 1,200 managers of all types of trucking companies operating in California. More than 80% of these managers consider traffic congestion on freeways and surface streets to be either a “somewhat serious” or “critically serious” problem for their business. A structural equations model is estimated on these data to determine how five aspects of the congestion problem differ across sectors of the trucking industry. The five aspects were slow average speeds, unreliable travel times, increased driver frustration and morale, higher fuel and maintenance costs, and higher costs of accidents and insurance. The model also simultaneously estimates how these five aspects combine to predict the perceived overall magnitude of the problem. Overall, congestion is perceived to be a more serious problem by managers of trucking companies engaged in intermodal operations, particularly private and for-hire trucking companies serving airports and private companies serving rail terminals. Companies specializing in refrigerated transport also perceive congestion to be a more serious overall problem, as do private companies engaged in LTL operations. The most problematic aspect of congestion is unreliable travel times, followed by driver frustration and morale, then by slow average speeds. Unreliable travel times are a significantly more serious problem for intermodal air operations. Driver frustration and morale attributable to congestion is perceived to be more of a problem by managers of long-haul carriers and tanker operations. Slow average speeds are also more of a concern for airport and refrigerated operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 1999. "Impacts of Highway Congestion on Freight Operations: Perceptions of Trucking Industry Managers," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt3dt7s30j, University of California Transportation Center.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt3dt7s30j
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/3dt7s30j.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ulf Olsson, 1979. "Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 44(4), pages 443-460, December.
    2. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, A C, 1999. "Freight Industry Attitudes Towards Policies to Reduce Congestion," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt57r4d3fd, University of California Transportation Center.
    3. Hall, Randolph W. & Intihar, Chris, 1997. "Commercial Vehicle Operations: Government Interfaces And Intelligent Transportation Systems," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt9p272488, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    4. Hensher, David A & Golob, Thomas F., 1998. "Searching for Policy Priorities in the Formulation of a Freight Transport Strategy: An Analysis of Freight Industry Attitudes," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2z94g3nk, University of California Transportation Center.
    5. Regan, Amelia C. & Golob, Thomas F., 1999. "Trucking Industry Perceptions of Congestion Problems and Potential Solutions in Maritime Intermodal Operations in California," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt14t3k3vf, University of California Transportation Center.
    6. Ulf Olsson & Fritz Drasgow & Neil Dorans, 1982. "The polyserial correlation coefficient," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 47(3), pages 337-347, September.
    7. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 1999. "Freight industry attitudes towards policies to reduce congestion," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt3fq6x2sq, University of California Transportation Center.
    8. Hensher, David A. & Golob, Thomas F., 1998. "Searching for Policy Priorities in the Formulation of a Freight Transport Strategy: An Analysis of Freight Industry Attitudes," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt169505dh, University of California Transportation Center.
    9. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 1999. "Trucking Industry Perceptions of Congestion Problems and Potential Solutions in Maritime Intermodal Operations in California," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2f0692sv, University of California Transportation Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 1999. "Impacts of Highway Congestion on Freight Operations: Perceptions of Trucking Industry Managers," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt37s3z2xd, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 1999. "Freight industry attitudes towards policies to reduce congestion," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt3fq6x2sq, University of California Transportation Center.
    3. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, A C, 1999. "Freight Industry Attitudes Towards Policies to Reduce Congestion," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt57r4d3fd, University of California Transportation Center.
    4. Golob, Thomas F. & Reagan, Amelia C., 2002. "Trucking Industry Adoption of Information Technology: A structural Multivariate Discrete Choice Model," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7kv5f17n, University of California Transportation Center.
    5. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, A C, 2002. "Trucking Industry Adoption of Information Technology: A Structural Multivariate Probit Model," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt9w1988t7, University of California Transportation Center.
    6. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 1999. "Trucking Industry Perceptions of Congestion Problems and Potential Solutions in Maritime Intermodal Operations in California," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2f0692sv, University of California Transportation Center.
    7. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 2001. "Impacts of highway congestion on freight operations: perceptions of trucking industry managers," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 577-599, August.
    8. Regan, Amelia C. & Golob, Thomas F., 1999. "Trucking Industry Perceptions of Congestion Problems and Potential Solutions in Maritime Intermodal Operations in California," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt14t3k3vf, University of California Transportation Center.
    9. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 2003. "Surveying and Modeling Trucking Industry Perceptions, Preferences and Behavior," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt1gw166zk, University of California Transportation Center.
    10. Golob, Thomas F. & Recker, Wilfred W. & Alvarez, Veronica M., 2004. "Safety aspects of freeway weaving sections," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 35-51, January.
    11. Mitchell, James & Weale, Martin R., 2007. "The rationality and reliability of expectations reported by British households: micro evidence from the British household panel survey," Discussion Paper Series 1: Economic Studies 2007,19, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    12. Golob, Thomas F. & Recker, Wilfred W. & Alvarez, Veronica M., 2003. "Safety Aspects of Freeway Weaving Sections," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt1zr6p58h, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    13. Florian Schuberth & Jörg Henseler & Theo K. Dijkstra, 2018. "Partial least squares path modeling using ordinal categorical indicators," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 9-35, January.
    14. Sonja N Sax & P. Robinan Gentry & Cynthia Van Landingham & Harvey J. Clewell & Kenneth A. Mundt, 2020. "Extended Analysis and Evidence Integration of Chloroprene as a Human Carcinogen," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(2), pages 294-318, February.
    15. Shaobo Jin & Fan Yang-Wallentin & Kenneth A. Bollen, 2021. "A unified model-implied instrumental variable approach for structural equation modeling with mixed variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(2), pages 564-594, June.
    16. Robert O'Brien & Pamela Homer, 1987. "Corrections for coarsely categorized measures: LISREL's polyserial and polychoric correlations," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 349-360, December.
    17. Jonas Moss & Steffen Grønneberg, 2023. "Partial Identification of Latent Correlations with Ordinal Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 241-252, March.
    18. Regan, Amelia C. & Golob, Thomas F., 2022. "Deployment Paths of ATIS: Impact on Commercial Vehicle Operations, Private Sector Providers and the Public Sector," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2578j4bj, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    19. Bengt Muthén, 1989. "Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 54(4), pages 557-585, September.
    20. Carolina Castaldi & Jan Faber & Maikel Kishna, 2010. "Co-innovation by KIBS in Environmental Services: A Resource-based View," Working Papers 10-05, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies, revised Mar 2010.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt3dt7s30j. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.