IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v40y2020i2p294-318.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extended Analysis and Evidence Integration of Chloroprene as a Human Carcinogen

Author

Listed:
  • Sonja N Sax
  • P. Robinan Gentry
  • Cynthia Van Landingham
  • Harvey J. Clewell
  • Kenneth A. Mundt

Abstract

β‐Chloroprene is used in the production of polychloroprene, a synthetic rubber. In 2010, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published the Integrated Risk Information System “Toxicological Review of Chloroprene,” concluding that chloroprene was “likely to be carcinogenic to humans.” This was based on findings from a 1998 National Toxicology Program (NTP) study showing multiple tumors within and across animal species; results from occupational epidemiological studies; a proposed mutagenic mode of action; and structural similarities with 1,3‐butadiene and vinyl chloride. Using mouse data from the NTP study and assuming a mutagenic mode of action, EPA calculated an inhalation unit risk (IUR) for chloroprene of 5 × 10−4 per µg/m3. This is among the highest IURs for chemicals classified by IARC or EPA as known or probable human carcinogens and orders of magnitude higher than the IURs for carcinogens such as vinyl chloride, benzene, and 1,3‐butadiene. Due to differences in pharmacokinetics, mice appear to be uniquely responsive to chloroprene exposure compared to other animals, including humans, which is consistent with the lack of evidence of carcinogenicity in robust occupational epidemiological studies. We evaluated and integrated all lines of evidence for chloroprene carcinogenicity to assess whether the 2010 EPA IUR could be scientifically substantiated. Due to clear interspecies differences in carcinogenic response to chloroprene, we applied a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for chloroprene to calculate a species‐specific internal dose (amount metabolized/gram of lung tissue) and derived an IUR that is over 100‐fold lower than the 2010 EPA IUR. Therefore, we recommend that EPA's IUR be updated.

Suggested Citation

  • Sonja N Sax & P. Robinan Gentry & Cynthia Van Landingham & Harvey J. Clewell & Kenneth A. Mundt, 2020. "Extended Analysis and Evidence Integration of Chloroprene as a Human Carcinogen," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(2), pages 294-318, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:40:y:2020:i:2:p:294-318
    DOI: 10.1111/risa.13397
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13397
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/risa.13397?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ulf Olsson, 1979. "Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 44(4), pages 443-460, December.
    2. John Arthur Bukowski, 2009. "Epidemiologic Evidence for Chloroprene Carcinogenicity: Review of Study Quality and its Application to Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(9), pages 1203-1216, September.
    3. Ulf Olsson & Fritz Drasgow & Neil Dorans, 1982. "The polyserial correlation coefficient," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 47(3), pages 337-347, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Golob, Thomas F. & Recker, Wilfred W. & Alvarez, Veronica M., 2004. "Safety aspects of freeway weaving sections," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 35-51, January.
    2. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 1999. "Impacts of Highway Congestion on Freight Operations: Perceptions of Trucking Industry Managers," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt37s3z2xd, University of California Transportation Center.
    3. Mitchell, James & Weale, Martin R., 2007. "The rationality and reliability of expectations reported by British households: micro evidence from the British household panel survey," Discussion Paper Series 1: Economic Studies 2007,19, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    4. Golob, Thomas F. & Recker, Wilfred W. & Alvarez, Veronica M., 2003. "Safety Aspects of Freeway Weaving Sections," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt1zr6p58h, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    5. Florian Schuberth & Jörg Henseler & Theo K. Dijkstra, 2018. "Partial least squares path modeling using ordinal categorical indicators," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 9-35, January.
    6. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 2001. "Impacts of highway congestion on freight operations: perceptions of trucking industry managers," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 577-599, August.
    7. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 1999. "Freight industry attitudes towards policies to reduce congestion," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt3fq6x2sq, University of California Transportation Center.
    8. Shaobo Jin & Fan Yang-Wallentin & Kenneth A. Bollen, 2021. "A unified model-implied instrumental variable approach for structural equation modeling with mixed variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(2), pages 564-594, June.
    9. Robert O'Brien & Pamela Homer, 1987. "Corrections for coarsely categorized measures: LISREL's polyserial and polychoric correlations," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 349-360, December.
    10. Jonas Moss & Steffen Grønneberg, 2023. "Partial Identification of Latent Correlations with Ordinal Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 241-252, March.
    11. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 1999. "Impacts of Highway Congestion on Freight Operations: Perceptions of Trucking Industry Managers," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt3dt7s30j, University of California Transportation Center.
    12. Bengt Muthén, 1989. "Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 54(4), pages 557-585, September.
    13. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, A C, 1999. "Freight Industry Attitudes Towards Policies to Reduce Congestion," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt57r4d3fd, University of California Transportation Center.
    14. Carolina Castaldi & Jan Faber & Maikel Kishna, 2010. "Co-innovation by KIBS in Environmental Services: A Resource-based View," Working Papers 10-05, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies, revised Mar 2010.
    15. Wolfgang Jagodzinski & Steffen M. Kãœhnel, 1987. "Estimation of Reliability and Stability in Single-Indicator Multiple-Wave Models," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 15(3), pages 219-258, February.
    16. Maystre, Nicolas & Olivier, Jacques & Thoenig, Mathias & Verdier, Thierry, 2014. "Product-based cultural change: Is the village global?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 212-230.
    17. Golob, Thomas F., 1988. "Structural Equation Modeling of Travel Choice Dynamics," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2kj325qv, University of California Transportation Center.
    18. Albert Maydeu-Olivares, 2006. "Limited information estimation and testing of discretized multivariate normal structural models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(1), pages 57-77, March.
    19. Shaobo Jin, 2022. "Frequentist Model Averaging in Structure Equation Model With Ordinal Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(3), pages 1130-1145, September.
    20. de Paula, Aureo & Attanasio, Orazio & Toppeta, Alessandro, 2020. "The Persistence of Socio-Emotional Skills Life Cycle and Intergenerational Evidence," CEPR Discussion Papers 15254, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:40:y:2020:i:2:p:294-318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.