IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerser/307990.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do USDA Farm Program Participants Contribute to Soil Erosion?

Author

Listed:
  • Reichelderfer, Katherine H.

Abstract

Only about one-third of U.S. cropland with excessive soil erosion rates is operated by farmers who might be influenced to reduce erosion if changes were made in the U.S. Department of Agriculture's commodity and soil conservation programs. The present commodity programs may conflict with conservation programs by encouraging the cultivation of erosive crops. Efforts to increase the consistency of USDA commodity and conservation programs would contribute little to overcoming the Nation's total erosion problems. Such efforts, however, should balance conservation objectives with objectives for farm income, commodity prices, production, and export.

Suggested Citation

  • Reichelderfer, Katherine H., 1985. "Do USDA Farm Program Participants Contribute to Soil Erosion?," Agricultural Economic Reports 307990, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerser:307990
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.307990
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/307990/files/aer532.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.307990?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James D. Johnson & Sara D. Short, 1983. "Commodity Programs: Who Has Received the Benefits?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 65(5), pages 912-921.
    2. Osteen, Craig, 1985. "Impacts Of Farm Policies On Soil Erosion: A Problem Definition Paper," Staff Reports 277652, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Bills, Nelson L. & Heimlich, Ralph E., 1984. "Assessing Erosion on U.S. Cropland: Land Management and Physical Features," Agricultural Economic Reports 307957, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gregory L. Poe & Richard M. Klemme & Shawn J. McComb & John E. Ambrosious, 1991. "Commodity Programs and the Internalization of Erosion Costs: Do They Affect Crop Rotation Decisions?," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 13(2), pages 223-235.
    2. Hyberg, Bengt & Pascoe, Sean, 1991. "Agriculture And Environmental Policy: Recent United States And Australian Developments," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 20(1), pages 1-10, April.
    3. Claassen, Roger & Breneman, Vincent E. & Bucholtz, Shawn & Cattaneo, Andrea & Johansson, Robert C. & Morehart, Mitchell J., 2004. "Environmental Compliance In U.S. Agricultural Policy: Past Performance And Future Potential," Agricultural Economic Reports 34033, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Nielsen, Elizabeth G. & Miranowski, John A. & Morehart, Mitchell J, 1989. "Investments in Soil Conservation and Land Improvements: Factors Explaining Farmers' Decisions," Agricultural Economic Reports 308064, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Cattaneo, Andrea & Claassen, Roger & Johansson, Robert C. & Weinberg, Marca, 2005. "Flexible Conservation Measures on Working Land: What Challenges Lie Ahead?," Economic Research Report 7248, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Negri, Donald H. & Moore, Michael R. & Young, C. Edwin & Schluntz, Larry J. & Porter, Dick L. & Willhite, Ronald M., 1988. "Surplus Crop Production and the Small Reclamation Projects Act," Agricultural Economic Reports 308043, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Heimlich, Ralph E., 1985. "Sodbusting: Land Use Change and Farm Programs," Agricultural Economic Reports 307993, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    8. Glaser, Lewrene K., 1986. "Provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309344, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. Unknown, 2007. "Estimating Water Quality, Air Quality, and Soil Carbon Benefits of the Conservation Reserve Program," FAPRI-MU Report Series 44777, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI).
    10. Gordon C. Rausser, 1992. "Predatory versus Productive Government: The Case of U.S. Agricultural Policies," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 6(3), pages 133-157, Summer.
    11. Tweeten, Luther G., 1985. "Are Current U.S. Farm Commodity Programs Outdated? Arguments In The Affirmative," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(2), pages 1-11, December.
    12. Heimlich, Ralph E. & Langner, Linda L., 1986. "Swampbusting: Wetland Conversion and Farm Programs," Agricultural Economic Reports 308005, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    13. Dicks, Michael R., 1987. "Definitional Consistency for Conservation Provisions of the 1985 Food Security Act," Staff Reports 277929, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    14. Doering, Otto & Smith, Katherine R., 2012. "Examining the Relationship of Conservation Compliance and Farm Program Incentives," C-FARE Reports 156624, Council on Food, Agricultural, and Resource Economics (C-FARE).
    15. Claassen, Roger & Hansen, LeRoy T. & Peters, Mark & Breneman, Vincent E. & Weinberg, Marca & Cattaneo, Andrea & Feather, Peter & Gadsby, Dwight M. & Hellerstein, Daniel & Hopkins, Jeffrey W. & Johnsto, 2001. "Agri-Environmental Policy at the Crossroads: Guideposts on a Changing Landscape," Agricultural Economic Reports 33983, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    16. Konyar, Kazim & McCormick, Ian & Osborn, Tim, 1993. "The U.S. Agricultural Resources Model (USARM): Model Documentation," Staff Reports 278704, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    17. Ervin, David & Algozin, Kenneth & Carey, Marc & Doering, Otto & Frerichs, Stephen & Heimlich, Ralph & Hrubovcak, Jum & Konyar, Kazim & McCormick, Ian & Osborn, Tim & Ribaudo, Marc & Shoemaker, Robbin, 1991. "Conservation and Environmental Issues in Agriculture: An Economic Evaluation of Policy Options," Staff Reports 278567, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    18. Economic Research Service, 1985. "Analysis of Policies to Conserve Soil and Reduce Surplus Crop Production," Agricultural Economic Reports 307992, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    19. Colacicco, D. & Barbarika, A. Jr. & Langner, L., 1987. "Conservation Benefits Of The Usda'S 1983 Payment-In-Kind And Acreage Reduction Programs," Staff Reports 277908, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heimlich, Ralph E., 1985. "Sodbusting: Land Use Change and Farm Programs," Agricultural Economic Reports 307993, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Gregory L. Poe & Richard M. Klemme & Shawn J. McComb & John E. Ambrosious, 1991. "Commodity Programs and the Internalization of Erosion Costs: Do They Affect Crop Rotation Decisions?," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 13(2), pages 223-235.
    3. Colacicco, D. & Barbarika, A. Jr. & Langner, L., 1987. "Conservation Benefits Of The Usda'S 1983 Payment-In-Kind And Acreage Reduction Programs," Staff Reports 277908, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Bills, Nelson L., . "Soil Erosivity And Crop Yield: Implications Of Land Retirement Program For New York Cropland," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 14(1), pages 1-8.
    5. Gillespie, Jeffrey M. & Hatch, L. Upton & Duffy, Patricia A., 1990. "Effect Of The 1985 Farm Bill Provisions On Farmers' Soil Conservation Decisions," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(2), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Anton Bekkerman & Eric J. Belasco & Vincent H. Smith, 2019. "Does Farm Size Matter? Distribution of Crop Insurance Subsidies and Government Program Payments across U.S. Farms," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 498-518, September.
    7. Nielsen, Elizabeth G. & Miranowski, John A. & Morehart, Mitchell J, 1989. "Investments in Soil Conservation and Land Improvements: Factors Explaining Farmers' Decisions," Agricultural Economic Reports 308064, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    8. Nelson, Frederick J., 1989. "Profile Of Farms Benefiting From The 1982 Farm Commodity Programs," Staff Reports 278238, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. Heimlich, Ralph E., 1985. "Characteristics Of Landowners Converting Land In The Western Great Plains, 1975-1977," Staff Reports 277683, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. Knutson, Ronald D., 1985. "Are Current U.S. Farm Commodity Programs Outdated? Arguments In The Negative," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(2), pages 1-9, December.
    11. Howland, Frank M., 1990. "Alternative Empirical Measures Of The Supply Effect Of The Corn Price Support Program," 1990 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Vancouver, Canada 271035, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    12. Economic Research Service, 1985. "Agricultural-Food Policy Review: Commodity Program Perspectives," Agricultural Economic Reports 307974, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    13. Heimlich, Ralph E. & Langner, Linda L., 1986. "Swampbusting: Wetland Conversion and Farm Programs," Agricultural Economic Reports 308005, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    14. Economic Research Service, 1985. "Analysis of Policies to Conserve Soil and Reduce Surplus Crop Production," Agricultural Economic Reports 307992, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    15. Ayer, Harry W., 1985. "Are Current Commodity Programs Outdated? Comments On The Knutson And Tweeten Arguments," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(2), pages 1-3, December.
    16. Belasco, Eric J. & Smith, Vincent, 2022. "The impact of policy design on payment concentration in Ad-hoc disaster Relief: Lessons from the Market Facilitation and Coronavirus food Assistance programs," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    17. Economic Research Service, 1986. "An Economic Analysis of USDA Erosion Control Programs: A New Perspective," Agricultural Economic Reports 308012, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    18. Robinson, Bobby H., 1984. "Fifty Years of Farm Policy: What have we Learned?," Working Papers 117655, Clemson University, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    19. Zulauf, Carl & Henderson, Dennis & Guither, Harold, 1985. "Government and Agriculture: A Comparison of Agribusiness and Farm Operator Views," 1985 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Ames, Iowa 278621, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    20. Aradhyula, Satheesh Venkata, 1989. "Policy structure, output supply and input demand for US crops," ISU General Staff Papers 198901010800009909, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerser:307990. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.