IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerser/308043.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Surplus Crop Production and the Small Reclamation Projects Act

Author

Listed:
  • Negri, Donald H.
  • Moore, Michael R.
  • Young, C. Edwin
  • Schluntz, Larry J.
  • Porter, Dick L.
  • Willhite, Ronald M.

Abstract

The U.S. Department of the Interior's Small Reclamation Projects Act (SRPA) program, by providing aid to improve existing irrigation systems, can increase irrigated acreage and crop production. The U.S. Department of Agriculture's commodity programs concurrently use target prices and acreage restrictions to cut production of surplus crops, namely corn, sorghum, oats, barley, wheat, rice, and upland cotton. This report reviews the links between SRPA loans and surplus crop production, and associated commodity program costs. The apparent conflict between the two programs is minor. A small percentage of USDA commodity program expenditures can be attributed to SRPA loans, and SRPA acres produce a small portion of USDA surplus crops.

Suggested Citation

  • Negri, Donald H. & Moore, Michael R. & Young, C. Edwin & Schluntz, Larry J. & Porter, Dick L. & Willhite, Ronald M., 1988. "Surplus Crop Production and the Small Reclamation Projects Act," Agricultural Economic Reports 308043, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerser:308043
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.308043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/308043/files/aer592.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.308043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reichelderfer, Katherine H., 1985. "Do USDA Farm Program Participants Contribute to Soil Erosion?," Agricultural Economic Reports 307990, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gregory L. Poe & Richard M. Klemme & Shawn J. McComb & John E. Ambrosious, 1991. "Commodity Programs and the Internalization of Erosion Costs: Do They Affect Crop Rotation Decisions?," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 13(2), pages 223-235.
    2. Colacicco, D. & Barbarika, A. Jr. & Langner, L., 1987. "Conservation Benefits Of The Usda'S 1983 Payment-In-Kind And Acreage Reduction Programs," Staff Reports 277908, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Heimlich, Ralph E., 1985. "Sodbusting: Land Use Change and Farm Programs," Agricultural Economic Reports 307993, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Dicks, Michael R., 1987. "Definitional Consistency for Conservation Provisions of the 1985 Food Security Act," Staff Reports 277929, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Unknown, 2007. "Estimating Water Quality, Air Quality, and Soil Carbon Benefits of the Conservation Reserve Program," FAPRI-MU Report Series 44777, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI).
    6. Gordon C. Rausser, 1992. "Predatory versus Productive Government: The Case of U.S. Agricultural Policies," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 6(3), pages 133-157, Summer.
    7. Cattaneo, Andrea & Claassen, Roger & Johansson, Robert C. & Weinberg, Marca, 2005. "Flexible Conservation Measures on Working Land: What Challenges Lie Ahead?," Economic Research Report 7248, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    8. Nielsen, Elizabeth G. & Miranowski, John A. & Morehart, Mitchell J, 1989. "Investments in Soil Conservation and Land Improvements: Factors Explaining Farmers' Decisions," Agricultural Economic Reports 308064, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. Konyar, Kazim & McCormick, Ian & Osborn, Tim, 1993. "The U.S. Agricultural Resources Model (USARM): Model Documentation," Staff Reports 278704, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. Claassen, Roger & Hansen, LeRoy T. & Peters, Mark & Breneman, Vincent E. & Weinberg, Marca & Cattaneo, Andrea & Feather, Peter & Gadsby, Dwight M. & Hellerstein, Daniel & Hopkins, Jeffrey W. & Johnsto, 2001. "Agri-Environmental Policy at the Crossroads: Guideposts on a Changing Landscape," Agricultural Economic Reports 33983, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    11. Heimlich, Ralph E. & Langner, Linda L., 1986. "Swampbusting: Wetland Conversion and Farm Programs," Agricultural Economic Reports 308005, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    12. Glaser, Lewrene K., 1986. "Provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309344, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    13. Economic Research Service, 1985. "Analysis of Policies to Conserve Soil and Reduce Surplus Crop Production," Agricultural Economic Reports 307992, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    14. Claassen, Roger & Breneman, Vincent E. & Bucholtz, Shawn & Cattaneo, Andrea & Johansson, Robert C. & Morehart, Mitchell J., 2004. "Environmental Compliance In U.S. Agricultural Policy: Past Performance And Future Potential," Agricultural Economic Reports 34033, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    15. Hyberg, Bengt & Pascoe, Sean, 1991. "Agriculture And Environmental Policy: Recent United States And Australian Developments," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 20(1), pages 1-10, April.
    16. Tweeten, Luther G., 1985. "Are Current U.S. Farm Commodity Programs Outdated? Arguments In The Affirmative," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(2), pages 1-11, December.
    17. Ervin, David & Algozin, Kenneth & Carey, Marc & Doering, Otto & Frerichs, Stephen & Heimlich, Ralph & Hrubovcak, Jum & Konyar, Kazim & McCormick, Ian & Osborn, Tim & Ribaudo, Marc & Shoemaker, Robbin, 1991. "Conservation and Environmental Issues in Agriculture: An Economic Evaluation of Policy Options," Staff Reports 278567, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    18. Doering, Otto & Smith, Katherine R., 2012. "Examining the Relationship of Conservation Compliance and Farm Program Incentives," C-FARE Reports 156624, Council on Food, Agricultural, and Resource Economics (C-FARE).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerser:308043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.