IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerssr/278238.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Profile Of Farms Benefiting From The 1982 Farm Commodity Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Nelson, Frederick J.

Abstract

Participants in the 1982 commodity support programs for wheat, feed grains, cotton, and rice (the program commodities) received only 38 percent of the benefits of these programs in 1982. Most of the program benefits went to nonparticipants, because all producers of program commodities shared in the $15.1-billion income increase arising from program-induced market price increases. The participants' benefit per farm was more than double that of nonparticipants, however. About 78 percent of benefits from the programs went to the 27 percent of all farms that were in the $40,000 to $499,999 sales class. This report, based mainly on 1982 Census of Agriculture data, looks at the 1982 and 1986 commodity programs, and the characteristics of program beneficiaries.

Suggested Citation

  • Nelson, Frederick J., 1989. "Profile Of Farms Benefiting From The 1982 Farm Commodity Programs," Staff Reports 278238, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278238
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.278238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/278238/files/ers-report-411.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.278238?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Economic Research Service, 1985. "The Current Financial Condition of Farmers and Farm Lenders," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309337, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. James D. Johnson & Sara D. Short, 1983. "Commodity Programs: Who Has Received the Benefits?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 65(5), pages 912-921.
    3. Salathe, Larry E. & Price, J. Michael & Gadson, Kenneth E., 1982. "The Food and Agricultural Policy Simulator," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 34(2), pages 1-15, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thayer, Sharon & Zulauf, Carl & Schnitkey, Gary & Forster, Lynn, 1994. "Updating Corn Program Payment Yields: Are Farm Operators Differentially Affected?," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 236-241, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gertel, Karl, 1985. "Differing Effects of Farm Commodity Programs on Land Returns and Land Values," Agricultural Economic Reports 307999, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Hoffman, Linwood A. & Livezey, Janet, 1987. "The U.S. Oats Industry," Agricultural Economic Reports 305462, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Ribaudo, Marc & Heimlich, Ralph E. & Peters, Mark, 1998. "Nitrogen Sources And Gulf Hypoxia: Potential For Point-Nonpoint Trading," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20796, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Ribaudo, Marc O. & Colacicco, Daniel & Langner, Linda L. & Piper, Steven & Schaible, Glenn D., 1990. "Natural Resources and Users Benefit from the Conservation Reserve Program," Agricultural Economic Reports 308085, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Bailey, Kenneth W., 2000. "Evaluating The Economic Impacts Of Regional Milk Pricing Authorities: The Case Of Dairy Compacts," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 29(2), pages 1-12, October.
    6. Chen, Dean T. & Dharmaratne, Gerard S., 1991. "Price Determination In Structural Models: A Comparison Of Alternative Inverse Demand Specifications," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271156, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    7. Young, C. Edwin & Osborn, C. Tim, 1990. "The Conservation Reserve Program: An Economic Assessment," Agricultural Economic Reports 308084, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    8. Green, Robert C., 1988. "Wheat Price And Income Support And Acreage Reduction Policy Instruments," 1988 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Knoxville, Tennessee 270148, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Bailey, DeeVon & Brorsen, B. Wade & Richardson, James W., 1984. "Dynamic Stochastic Simulation of Daily Cash and Futures Cotton Prices," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(2), pages 109-116, December.
    10. Reichelderfer, Katherine H., 1985. "Do USDA Farm Program Participants Contribute to Soil Erosion?," Agricultural Economic Reports 307990, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    11. Baum, Kenneth H. & Harrington, David H., 1983. "Effects of Alternative Economic Scenarios and Commodity Policies on Regional Representative Farms," Staff Reports 337010, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    12. Johnson, James & Clayton, Kenneth, 1982. "Organization And Well-Being Of The Farming Industry: Reflectlions 7:1":%82 Agriculture And Food Act Of 1981," 1982 Annual Meeting, August 1-4, Logan, Utah 279424, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    13. Baum, Kenneth H. & McElroy, Robert G. & Frick, George, 1984. "A Farm Level Perspective Of Several Dairy Policy And Program Proposals," 1984 Annual Meeting, August 5-8, Ithaca, New York 278921, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    14. Fox, Austin & Moore, Charles & Stults, Harold, 1984. "Production Of Surplus Crops On Irrigated Land Served By The U.S. Bureau Of Reclamation," Staff Reports 276833, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    15. Westcott, Paul C. & Price, J. Michael, 2001. "Analysis Of The U.S. Commodity Loan Program With Marketing Loan Provisions," Agricultural Economic Reports 34035, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    16. Langley, Suchada V. & Somwaru, Agapi & Normile, Mary Anne, 2006. "Trade Liberalization in International Dairy Markets: Estimated Impacts," Economic Research Report 7214, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    17. Kilkenny, Maureen, 1988. "Modelling the Removal of Production Incentive Distortions in the US Agricultural Sector," 1988 Conference, August 24-31, 1988, Buenos Aires, Argentina 183151, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Liu, Hsiang-Hsi, 1983. "An annual simultaneous equation econometric model of U.S. corn and soybean cash and futures markets," ISU General Staff Papers 198301010800009935, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    19. Somwaru, Agapi & Dirkse, Steve, 2012. "Dynamic PEATSim Model: Documenting Its Use in Analyzing Global Commodity Markets," Technical Bulletins 129359, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    20. Smyth, Donald Craig, 1985. "Economic impacts of the Farmer-Owned Reserve program on the U.S. corn-livestock sector," ISU General Staff Papers 1985010108000013104, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.