IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/c/pre182.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Joana Resende

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Didier Laussel & Ngo van Long & Joana Resende, 2022. "Asymmetric Information and Differentiated Durable Goods Monopoly: Intra-Period Versus Intertemporal Discrimination," Post-Print hal-03434362, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Didier Laussel & Ngo Van Long, 2022. "Quality differentiation in durable goods monopoly always yields strictly positive profits," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 42(2), pages 546-552.

  2. Didier Laussel & Ngo Van Long & Joana Resende, 2021. "Asymmetric Information and Differentiated Durable Goods Monopoly: Intra-Period Versus Intertemporal Price Discrimination," CESifo Working Paper Series 9294, CESifo.

    Cited by:

    1. Didier Laussel & Ngo Van Long, 2022. "Quality differentiation in durable goods monopoly always yields strictly positive profits," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 42(2), pages 546-552.

  3. Didier Laussel & Ngo Van Long & Joana Resende, 2021. "Profit Effects of Consumers’ Identity Management: A Dynamic Model," CESifo Working Paper Series 9279, CESifo.

    Cited by:

    1. Stefano Colombo & Paolo G. Garella & Noriaki Matsushima, 2023. "Strategic anonymity and behavior-based pricing," ISER Discussion Paper 1219r, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University, revised Jan 2025.

  4. Paolo Garella & Didier Laussel & Joana Resende, 2021. "Behavior based price personalization under vertical product differentiation," Post-Print hal-03263513, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Tao Wang & Shi-Xiao Wang, 2022. "International Manufacturer’s Online Marketplace Choice Considering Behavior-Based Pricing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Wang, Yu & Li, Minqiang & Feng, Haiyang & Feng, Nan, 2023. "Which is better for competing firms with quality increasing: behavior-based price discrimination or uniform pricing?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    3. Shuilin Liu & Xudong Lin & Xiaoli Huang & Hanyang Luo & Sumin Yu, 2023. "Research on Service-Driven Benign Market with Platform Subsidy Strategy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Didier Laussel, 2023. "Do firms always benefit from the presence of active customers?," Post-Print hal-03777069, HAL.
    5. Stefano Colombo & Clara Graziano & Aldo Pignataro, 2021. "History-Based Price Discrimination with Imperfect Information Accuracy and Asymmetric Market Shares," CESifo Working Paper Series 9049, CESifo.
    6. Chongwoo Choe & Noriaki Matsushima & Mark J. Tremblay, 2020. "Behavior-Based Personalized Pricing: When Firms Can Share Customer Information," ISER Discussion Paper 1083r, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University, revised Jul 2021.
    7. Tulabandhula, Theja & Ouksel, Aris M. & Nguyen, Son The, 2023. "Impact of customer loyalty and differing firm costs on price discrimination in an infinite horizon setting," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 344-377.
    8. Okuyama, Suzuka, 2021. "Behavior-based Price Discrimination in the Domestic and International Mixed duopoly," MPRA Paper 110206, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Nakagawa, Akihiko & Matsushima, Noriaki, 2023. "A note on conglomerate mergers: The Google/Fitbit case," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    10. Yue Shen & Weijun Zhong & Shue Mei, 2023. "Advertising strategies of competing firms considering consumer privacy concerns," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 2424-2437, June.
    11. Colombo, Stefano & Graziano, Clara & Pignataro, Aldo, 2024. "Imperfect history-based price discrimination with asymmetric market shares," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    12. Li, Jianpei & Zhang, Wanzhu, 2022. "Behavior-based price discrimination and signaling of product quality," MPRA Paper 111572, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Shuaicheng Liu, 2024. "Privacy regulation in asymmetric environments," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 66(2), pages 157-173, December.
    14. Lei Yan & Yuxiang Zhang & Shue Mei & Weijun Zhong, 2024. "Personalized pricing with persuasive advertising and the value of consumer information: a duopoly framework," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1533-1562, September.
    15. Didier Laussel & Joana Resende, 2022. "When Is Product Personalization Profit-Enhancing? A Behavior-Based Discrimination Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(12), pages 8872-8888, December.
    16. Didier Laussel & Joana Resende, 2022. "When Is Product Personalization Profit-Enhancing? A Behavior-Based Discrimination Model," Post-Print hal-03740642, HAL.
    17. Michel Tolksdorf, 2023. "On Point Predictions and Reference Dependence in Behavior-Based Pricing Experiments," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14.

  5. Didier Laussel & Ngo Long & Joana Resende, 2020. "The curse of knowledge: having access to customer information can reduce monopoly profits," Post-Print hal-02941111, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Didier Laussel, 2023. "Do firms always benefit from the presence of active customers?," Post-Print hal-03777069, HAL.
    2. Didier Laussel & Ngo Van Long & Joana Resende, 2021. "Dynamic Monopoly and Consumers Profiling Accuracy," CESifo Working Paper Series 9346, CESifo.
    3. Chongwoo Choe & Noriaki Matsushima & Mark J. Tremblay, 2020. "Behavior-Based Personalized Pricing: When Firms Can Share Customer Information," ISER Discussion Paper 1083r, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University, revised Jul 2021.
    4. Li, Jianpei & Zhang, Wanzhu, 2022. "Behavior-based pricing and signaling of product quality," MPRA Paper 120263, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 03 Jan 2023.

  6. Laussel, Didier & Long, Ngo Van & Resende, Joana, 2020. "Quality and Price Personalization under Customer Recognition: a Dynamic Monopoly Model with Contrasting Equilibria," Discussion paper series HIAS-E-96, Hitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, Hitotsubashi University.

    Cited by:

    1. Didier Laussel & Ngo Van Long & Joana Resende, 2021. "Dynamic Monopoly and Consumers Profiling Accuracy," CESifo Working Paper Series 9346, CESifo.
    2. Didier Laussel & Ngo van Long & Joana Resende, 2023. "Profit Effects of Consumers’ Identity Management: A Dynamic Model," Post-Print hal-04019356, HAL.
    3. Didier Laussel & Ngo Van Long, 2022. "Quality differentiation in durable goods monopoly always yields strictly positive profits," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 42(2), pages 546-552.
    4. Didier Laussel & Ngo Long & Joana Resende, 2022. "Asymmetric Information and Differentiated Durable Goods Monopoly: Intra-Period Versus Intertemporal Discrimination," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 574-607, June.
    5. Okuyama, Suzuka, 2024. "Behavior-based price discrimination and elastic demand," MPRA Paper 120949, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Lei Yan & Yuxiang Zhang & Shue Mei & Weijun Zhong, 2024. "Personalized pricing with persuasive advertising and the value of consumer information: a duopoly framework," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1533-1562, September.

  7. Nada Belhadj & Didier Laussel & Joana Resende, 2020. "Marketplace or reselling? A signalling model," Post-Print hal-02469425, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Qin, Xuelian & Liu, Zhixue & Tian, Lin, 2021. "The optimal combination between selling mode and logistics service strategy in an e-commerce market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(2), pages 639-651.
    2. Hu, Li & Zhang, Weiyi & Du, Shaofu & Sun, Xiahui, 2025. "How to achieve targeted advertising with the e-commerce platform’s membership system?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    3. Chen, Zhongwei & Fan, Zhi-Ping & Zhao, Xuan, 2021. "Offering return-freight insurance or not: Strategic analysis of an e-seller's decisions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    4. Bian, Yiwen & Wang, Hang & Yan, Shuai & Han, Xiaohua, 2024. "Platform channel strategy of selling format: Effect of asymmetric service information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    5. Xudong Lin & Shuilin Liu & Xiaoli Huang & Hanyang Luo & Sumin Yu, 2021. "Platform Revenue Strategy Selection Considering Consumer Group Data Privacy Regulation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(22), pages 1-24, November.
    6. Yushi Tsunoda & Yusuke Zennyo, 2021. "Platform Information Transparency and Effects on Third‐Party Suppliers and Offline Retailers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 4219-4235, November.
    7. Zhou, Xiaoyang & Liu, He & Li, Jialu & Zhang, Kai & Lev, Benjamin, 2023. "Channel strategies when digital platforms emerge: A systematic literature review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Gu, Dingwei & Huang, Yangguang, 2024. "Agency model versus wholesale model," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    9. Li, Lin & Li, Guo, 2023. "Integrating logistics service or not? The role of platform entry strategy in an online marketplace," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    10. Chang, Shuhua & Li, Anqi & Wang, Xinyu & Zhang, Jiayue, 2023. "Optimal combination of platform channel contract and guarantee financing strategy in e-commerce market," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    11. Tan, Yinliang (Ricky) & Yu, Chuanbin & Liu, Yang & Zheng, Quan, 2024. "Agency models in online platforms: A review of recent developments and future prospects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 319(3), pages 679-695.
    12. Dai, Bin & Du, Yuwen & Yang, Qingbei & Xie, Xia, 2024. "Implications of unobservable promotion on distribution channel strategies in a retail platform," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).

  8. Didier Laussel & Ngo Van Long & Joana Resende, 2019. "Quality and Price Personalization under Customer Recognition: A Dynamic Monopoly Model," CIRANO Working Papers 2019s-03, CIRANO.

    Cited by:

    1. Fatemeh Akhyani & Alireza Komeili Birjandi & Reza Sheikh & Shib Sankar Sana, 2022. "New approach based on proximity/remoteness measurement for customer classification," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 267-298, June.

  9. Laussel, Didier & Long, Ngo Van & Resende, Joana, 2019. "The Curse of Knowledge: Having Access to Customer Information Can be Detrimental to Monopoly’s Profit," Discussion paper series HIAS-E-93, Hitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, Hitotsubashi University.

    Cited by:

    1. Didier Laussel & Ngo van Long & Joana Resende, 2023. "Profit Effects of Consumers’ Identity Management: A Dynamic Model," Post-Print hal-04019356, HAL.

  10. Didier Laussel & Joana Resende, 2018. "Complementary Monopolies with Asymmetric Information," AMSE Working Papers 1842, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.

    Cited by:

    1. Didier Laussel & Joana Resende, 2020. "Complementary Monopolies with asymmetric information," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 70(4), pages 943-981, November.
    2. Rabah Amir, 2020. "Special Issue: Supermodularity and Monotonicity in Economics," Post-Print hal-03122852, HAL.
    3. Martimort, David & Semenov, Aggey & Stole, Lars, 2017. "A Complete Characterization of Equilibria in a Common Agency Screening Game," MPRA Paper 80870, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Yen-Ju Lin & Yan-Shu Lin & Pei-Cyuan Shih, 2022. "Welfare reducing vertical licensing in the presence of complementary inputs," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 137(2), pages 121-143, October.
    5. Didier Laussel & Ngo Van Long, 2019. "Tying the Politicians’ Hands: The Optimal Limits to Representative Democracy," CIRANO Working Papers 2019s-14, CIRANO.
    6. Rakesh Chaturvedi & Ashish Kumar Pandey, 2024. "Double auction for trading perfect complements," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 26(1), February.
    7. Jihwan Do & Nicolás Riquelme, 2024. "Information exchange through secret vertical contracts," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 78(3), pages 671-707, November.

  11. Didier LAUSSEL & Ngo Van LONG & Joana RESENDE, 2014. "Network Effects, Aftermarkets and the Coase Conjecture : A Dynamic Markovian Approach," Cahiers de recherche 06-2014, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ.

    Cited by:

    1. Tamás Sebestyén & Balázs Szabó, 2022. "Market interaction structure and equilibrium price heterogeneity in monopolistic competition," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 259-282, October.
    2. Didier Laussel & Ngo Van Long & Joana Resende, 2019. "The Curse of Knowledge: Having Access to Customer Information Can Reduce Monopoly Profit," CIRANO Working Papers 2019s-04, CIRANO.
    3. Didier Laussel & Ngo Van Long & Joana Resende, 2021. "Dynamic Monopoly and Consumers Profiling Accuracy," CESifo Working Paper Series 9346, CESifo.
    4. Rabah Amir & Igor Evstigneev & Adriana Gama, 2019. "Oligopoly with Network Effects: Firm-Specific versus Single Network," Economics Discussion Paper Series 1910, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    5. Laussel, Didier & Long, Ngo Van & Resende, Joana, 2020. "Quality and Price Personalization under Customer Recognition: a Dynamic Monopoly Model with Contrasting Equilibria," Discussion paper series HIAS-E-96, Hitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, Hitotsubashi University.
    6. Seiya Hirano, 2024. "Consumer Coordination and Optimal Pricing under Network Externalities," ISER Discussion Paper 1267r, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University, revised Jan 2025.
    7. Ngo Long, 2015. "Dynamic Games Between Firms and Infinitely Lived Consumers: A Review of the Literature," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 467-492, December.
    8. Didier Laussel & Ngo Long & Joana Resende, 2022. "Asymmetric Information and Differentiated Durable Goods Monopoly: Intra-Period Versus Intertemporal Discrimination," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 574-607, June.
    9. Jorge Padilla & Joe Perkins & Salvatore Piccolo, 2022. "Self‐Preferencing in Markets with Vertically Integrated Gatekeeper Platforms," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(2), pages 371-395, June.
    10. Jorge Padilla & Joe Perkins & Salvatore Piccolo, 2020. "Self-Preferencing in Markets with Vertically-Integrated Gatekeeper Platforms," CSEF Working Papers 582, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.

  12. Didier Laussel & Joana Resende, 2014. "Dynamic price competition in aftermarkets with network effects," Post-Print hal-01463925, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Svetlana Boyarchenko, 2020. "Super- and submodularity of stopping games with random observations," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 70(4), pages 983-1022, November.
    2. Pekka Sääskilahti, 2016. "Buying Decision Coordination and Monopoly Pricing of Network Goods," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 313-333, April.
    3. Jullien, Bruno & Pavan, Alessandro & Rysman, Marc, 2021. "Two-sided Markets, Pricing, and Network Effects," TSE Working Papers 21-1238, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    4. Didier Laussel & Ngo van Long & Joana Resende, 2015. "Network effects, aftermarkets and the Coase conjecture: A dynamic Markovian approach," Post-Print hal-01457339, HAL.
    5. Rabah Amir & Igor Evstigneev & Adriana Gama, 2019. "Oligopoly with Network Effects: Firm-Specific versus Single Network," Economics Discussion Paper Series 1910, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    6. Dainis Zēgners & Tobias Kretschmer, 2017. "Competition with Aftermarket Power When Consumers Are Heterogeneous," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 96-122, February.
    7. Cabral, Luís, 2014. "Aftermarket power and foremarket competition," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 60-69.
    8. Gary Biglaiser & Jacques Crémer, 2020. "The Value of Incumbency When Platforms Face Heterogeneous Customers," Post-Print hal-03049041, HAL.
    9. Adriana Gama & Rim Lahmandi-Ayed & Ana Elisa Pereira, 2020. "Entry and mergers in oligopoly with firm-specific network effects," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 70(4), pages 1139-1164, November.

  13. Vitor Miguel Ribeiro & João Correia-da-Silva & Joana Resende, 2014. "Nesting Vertical and Horizontal Differentiation in Two-Sided Markets," FEP Working Papers 535, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.

    Cited by:

    1. Debora Di Gioacchino & Alina Verashchagina, 2017. "Mass media and attitudes to inequality," Working Papers in Public Economics 178, Department of Economics and Law, Sapienza University of Roma.
    2. Maria Rosa Battaggion & Serena Marianna Drufuca, 2020. "Quality competition and entry: a media market case," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 130(1), pages 1-36, June.
    3. Nestor Duch-Brown, 2017. "Quality discrimination in online multi-sided markets," JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy 2017-06, Joint Research Centre.
    4. Di Gioacchino, Debora & Verashchagina, Alina, 2020. "Mass media and preferences for redistribution," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    5. Luigi Serio & Piero Tedeschi & Giovanni Ursino, 2018. "Making Sense of (Ultra) Low-Cost Flights Vertical Differentiation in Two-Sided Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 401-420, January.
    6. Sangita Poddar & Tanmoyee Banerjee (Chatterjee) & Swapnendu Banerjee, 2024. "A theoretical analysis on two‐sided duopoly platforms and tax regimes," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 20(1), pages 88-119, March.

  14. GABSZEWICZ, Jean J. & RESENDE, Joana, 2012. "Differentiated credence goods and price competition," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2461, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).

    Cited by:

    1. von Auer, Ludwig & Trede, Mark, 2014. "Markets with Technological Progress: Pricing, Quality and Novelty," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100581, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    2. Helmut Bester & Matthias Dahm, 2018. "Credence Goods, Costly Diagnosis and Subjective Evaluation," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 128(611), pages 1367-1394, June.
    3. Sendhil Mullainathan & Andrei Shleifer, 2005. "The Market for News," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 95(4), pages 1031-1053, September.
    4. Bester, Helmut & Yaofu, Ouyang, 2018. "Optimal procurement of a credence good under limited liability," Discussion Papers 2018/1, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    5. A. Cavaliere & G. Crea, 2022. "Brand premia driven by perceived vertical differentiation in markets with information disparity and optimistic consumers," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 223-253, April.

  15. Rosa Branca Esteves & Joana Resende, 2011. "Competitive Targeted Advertising with Price Discrimination," NIPE Working Papers 08/2011, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.

    Cited by:

    1. Rosa Brana Esteves & Joana Resende, 2017. "Personalized Pricing with Targeted Advertising: Who are the Winners?," NIPE Working Papers 02/2017, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.
    2. Karle, Heiko, 2019. "Excessive Targeting," VfS Annual Conference 2019 (Leipzig): 30 Years after the Fall of the Berlin Wall - Democracy and Market Economy 203626, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    3. Rim Lahmandi-Ayed & Didier Laussel, 2024. "Random Informative Advertising with Vertically Differentiated Products," Post-Print hal-04678637, HAL.
    4. Juan Liu & Weijun Zhong & Jianqiang Zhang & Shu’e Mei, 2024. "The effectiveness of cross-platform targeted advertising strategy," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 2831-2847, December.
    5. Roberto Burguet & Vaiva Petrikaitė, 2023. "Targeted advertising and costly consumer search," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 61(2), pages 430-450, April.
    6. Yan Wang & Shue Mei & Weijun Zhong, 2022. "Advertising or recommender systems? A game‐theoretic analysis of online retailer platforms' decision‐making," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 2119-2132, September.
    7. Feng Zhu & Xinxin Li & Ehsan Valavi & Marco Iansiti, 2021. "Network Interconnectivity and Entry into Platform Markets," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 1009-1024, September.
    8. Zhao Jiang & Wu Dan & Liu Jie, 2020. "Distinct role of targeting precision of Internet-based targeted advertising in duopolistic e-business firms’ heterogeneous consumers market," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 453-474, June.
    9. Karle, Heiko & Peitz, Martin, 2016. "De-targeting: advertising an assortment of products to loss-averse consumers," Working Papers 16-03, University of Mannheim, Department of Economics.
    10. Chen Chen & Yongrui Duan & Guiping Li, 2022. "Adoption of personalized pricing in a supply chain," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(7), pages 2715-2728, October.
    11. Chongwoo Choe & Stephen King & Noriaki Matsushima, 2017. "Pricing with Cookies: Behavior-Based Price Discrimination and Spatial Competition," Monash Economics Working Papers 07-17, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    12. Simon Anderson & Alicia Baik & Nathan Larson, 2023. "Price Discrimination in the Information Age: Prices, Poaching, and Privacy with Personalized Targeted Discounts," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 90(5), pages 2085-2115.
    13. Sridhar Moorthy & Shervin Shahrokhi Tehrani, 2023. "Targeting Advertising Spending and Price on the Hotelling Line," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(6), pages 1057-1079, November.
    14. Liying Yang & Yi Qian & Hui Xie, 2024. "Handling Endogenous Marketing Mix Regressors in Correlated Heterogeneous Panels with Copula Augmented Mean Group Estimation," NBER Working Papers 33265, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Esteves, Rosa-Branca, 2022. "Can personalized pricing be a winning strategy in oligopolistic markets with heterogeneous demand customers? Yes, it can," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    16. Gökgür, Burak & Karabatı, Selçuk, 2019. "Dynamic and targeted bundle pricing of two independently valued products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(1), pages 184-198.
    17. Andreas Hefti & Shuo Liu, 2020. "Targeted information and limited attention," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 51(2), pages 402-420, June.
    18. Michael Arnold & Eric Schmidbauer & Lan Zhang, 2022. "Uniform and targeted informative advertising with asymmetric customer loyalty," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 90-114, February.
    19. Andreas Hefti & Shuo Liu, 2016. "Targeted information and limited attention," ECON - Working Papers 230, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Dec 2019.
    20. Zhijun Chen & Chongwoo Choe Author-X-Name- Chongwoo & Noriaki Matsushima, 2019. "Competitive Personalized Pricing," Monash Economics Working Papers 02-18, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    21. Rim Lahmandi-Ayed & Didier Laussel, 2024. "Random Informative Advertising with Vertically Differentiated Products," Games, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-29, March.
    22. Michael D. Wittman & Peter P. Belobaba, 2017. "Personalization in airline revenue management – Heuristics for real-time adjustment of availability and fares," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(4), pages 376-396, August.
    23. Noriaki Matsushima & Tomomichi Mizuno & Cong Pan, 2023. "Personalized pricing with heterogeneous mismatch costs," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 90(2), pages 369-388, October.
    24. Lynne Pepall & Dan Richards, 2018. "Targeted Branding, Price Competition and Consumer Data," Discussion Papers Series, Department of Economics, Tufts University 0824, Department of Economics, Tufts University.
    25. Lei Yan & Yuxiang Zhang & Shue Mei & Weijun Zhong, 2024. "Personalized pricing with persuasive advertising and the value of consumer information: a duopoly framework," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1533-1562, September.
    26. Weimin Ma & Rong Cheng & Hua Ke, 2018. "Impacts of Power Structure on Supply Chain with a Store Brand," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(04), pages 1-25, August.
    27. Garcia Pires Armando J., 2020. "Content Provision in the Media Market with Single-Homing and Multi-Homing Consumers," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 19(1), pages 43-83, March.
    28. Wang, Wei & Li, Gang & Fung, Richard Y.K. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2019. "Mobile Advertising and Traffic Conversion: The Effects of Front Traffic and Spatial Competition," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 84-101.
    29. Qiuyu Lu & Noriaki Matsushima, 2023. "Personalized pricing when consumers can purchase multiple items," ISER Discussion Paper 1192, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    30. Noriaki Matsushima & Mark J. Tremblay, 2024. "Network compatibility and incumbent pricing regimes," ISER Discussion Paper 1265, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    31. Lynne Pepall & Daniel Richards, 2021. "Targeted Value-Enhancing Advertising and Price Competition," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 59(3), pages 443-459, November.
    32. Siemering, Christian, 2023. "A model of endogenous targeting in duopoly," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    33. Xiuxian Li & Pengwen Hou & Shuhua Zhang, 2023. "The optimal advertising strategy with differentiated targeted effect consumers," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 1295-1336, May.
    34. Zhou, Yongyi & Zhang, Yulin & Goh, Mark, 2023. "Platform responses to entry in a local market with mobile providers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 236-251.
    35. Zhang, Jianqiang & He, Xiuli, 2019. "Targeted advertising by asymmetric firms," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 136-150.
    36. Mateusz Mysliwski & Lars Nesheim & Simeon Duckworth, 2023. "Taking the biscuit: how Safari privacy policies affect online advertising," CeMMAP working papers 04/23, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    37. Rosa-Branca Esteves, 2021. "Can personalized pricing be a winning strategy in oligopolistic markets with heterogeneous demand customers? Yes, it can," NIPE Working Papers 08/2021, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.
    38. Esteves, Rosa-Branca & Resende, Joana, 2019. "Personalized pricing and advertising: Who are the winners?," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 239-282.
    39. Li, Changying & Li, Youping & Zhang, Jianhu, 2023. "Targeted advertising with R&D rivalry," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 24-34.
    40. Li, Sanxi & Sun, Hailin & Yu, Jun, 2023. "Competitive targeted online advertising," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).

  16. Joana Resende & Maria Eugénia Sanin, 2009. "Optimal allocation of tradable emission permits under upstream-downstream strategic interaction," Working Papers hal-00437645, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Tanachai Limpaitoon, Yihsu Chen, and Shmuel S. Oren, 2014. "The Impact of Imperfect Competition in Emission Permits Trading on Oligopolistic Electricity Markets," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3).
    2. Hintermann, Beat & Peterson, Sonja & Rickels, Wilfried, 2014. "Price and market behavior in Phase II of the EU ETS," Kiel Working Papers 1962, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    3. da Silva, Patricia Pereira & Moreno, Blanca & Figueiredo, Nuno Carvalho, 2016. "Firm-specific impacts of CO2 prices on the stock market value of the Spanish power industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 492-501.

  17. Jean J. GABSZEWICZ & Filomena, GARCIA & Joana, PAIS & Joana, RESENDE, 2008. "On Gale and Shapley ‘College admissions and stability of marriage’," Discussion Papers (ECON - Département des Sciences Economiques) 2008046, Université catholique de Louvain, Département des Sciences Economiques.

    Cited by:

    1. Ismail Saglam, 2020. "Measuring external stability in one-to-one matching," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 40(1), pages 234-247.
    2. Saglam, Ismail, 2019. "Measuring the External Stability of the One-to-One Matching Generated by the Deferred Acceptance Algorithm," MPRA Paper 91472, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Salonen, Hannu & Salonen, Mikko A.A., 2018. "Mutually best matches," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 42-50.

  18. GABSZEWICZ, Jean J. & RESENDE, Joana, 2007. "Thematic clubs and the supremacy of network externalities," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2007073, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).

    Cited by:

    1. Sam‐Ho Lee, 2023. "Theory of cultural capital: Productive use of an unproductive activity," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 25(2), pages 359-375, April.
    2. Vitor Miguel Ribeiro & João Correia-da-Silva & Joana Resende, 2014. "Nesting Vertical and Horizontal Differentiation in Two-Sided Markets," FEP Working Papers 535, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    3. Bernardo Guimaraes & Caio Machado & Ana E. Pereira, 2020. "Dynamic coordination with timing frictions: Theory and applications," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 22(3), pages 656-697, June.
    4. Lisa Windsteiger, 2021. "Monopolistic supply of sorting, inequality, and welfare," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 23(5), pages 801-821, October.

  19. RESENDE, Joana, 2007. "The economic advantage of “being the voice of the majority”," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2007028, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).

    Cited by:

    1. Rabah Amir & Jean Gabszewicz & Joana Resende, 2014. "Thematic Clubs and the Supremacy of Network Externalities," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 16(5), pages 706-729, October.
    2. Rabah Amir & Igor Evstigneev & Adriana Gama, 2019. "Oligopoly with Network Effects: Firm-Specific versus Single Network," Economics Discussion Paper Series 1910, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    3. Vitor Miguel Ribeiro & João Correia-da-Silva & Joana Resende, 2014. "Nesting Vertical and Horizontal Differentiation in Two-Sided Markets," FEP Working Papers 535, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    4. Armando J. Garcia Pires, 2013. "Media Plurality and the Intensity of Readers' Political Preferences," Journal of Media Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 41-55, March.
    5. Anderson, Simon & Waldfogel, Joel, 2015. "Preference Externalities in Media Markets," CEPR Discussion Papers 10835, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

  20. Joana Resende & Elvira Silva, 2007. "A Profit Efficiency Perspective on the Future Strategic Positioning of the Portuguese Banks," CEF.UP Working Papers 0702, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.

    Cited by:

    1. Stephanie McWhinnie & Kofi Otumawu-Apreku, 2013. "Evaluating Profit Efficiency of the South Australian Rock Lobster Fishery: Nerlovian and Directional Distance Function Approach," School of Economics and Public Policy Working Papers 2013-18, University of Adelaide, School of Economics and Public Policy.
    2. A. R. Jayaraman & Pradip Bhuyan, 2020. "Impact of NPA and loan write-offs on the profit efficiency of Indian banks," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 47(1), pages 35-48, March.
    3. Stephanie McWhinnie & Kofi Otumawu-Apreku, 2013. "Profit Efficiency of the South Australian Rock Lobster Fishery: Nerlovian and Directional Distance Function Approach," School of Economics and Public Policy Working Papers 2013-13, University of Adelaide, School of Economics and Public Policy.

Articles

  1. Garella, Paolo G. & Laussel, Didier & Resende, Joana, 2021. "Behavior based price personalization under vertical product differentiation," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Laussel, Didier & Long, Ngo Van & Resende, Joana, 2020. "Quality and price personalization under customer recognition: A dynamic monopoly model with contrasting equilibria," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    See citations under working paper version above.
  3. Didier Laussel & Joana Resende, 2020. "Complementary Monopolies with asymmetric information," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 70(4), pages 943-981, November.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  4. Belhadj, Nada & Laussel, Didier & Resende, Joana, 2020. "Marketplace or reselling? A signalling model," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    See citations under working paper version above.
  5. Didier Laussel & Ngo V. Long & Joana Resende, 2020. "The curse of knowledge: having access to customer information can reduce monopoly profits," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 51(3), pages 650-675, September.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  6. Esteves, Rosa-Branca & Resende, Joana, 2019. "Personalized pricing and advertising: Who are the winners?," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 239-282.

    Cited by:

    1. Margarita De-Miguel-Guzmán & Carlos Ronquillo-Bolaños & Alexander Sánchez-Rodríguez & Gelmar García-Vidal & Reyner Pérez-Campdesuñer & Rodobaldo Martínez-Vivar, 2020. "Analysis of the Effectiveness of Advertising Messages. Comparison by Media, Typology, and Schedule of Advertisements," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 32(1), pages 27-46.
    2. Rim Lahmandi-Ayed & Didier Laussel, 2024. "Random Informative Advertising with Vertically Differentiated Products," Post-Print hal-04678637, HAL.
    3. Jean-Pierre I. Rest & Alan M. Sears & Li Miao & Lorna Wang, 2020. "A note on the future of personalized pricing: cause for concern," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(2), pages 113-118, April.
    4. Chen Chen & Yongrui Duan & Guiping Li, 2022. "Adoption of personalized pricing in a supply chain," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(7), pages 2715-2728, October.
    5. Shuilin Liu & Xudong Lin & Xiaoli Huang & Hanyang Luo & Sumin Yu, 2023. "Research on Service-Driven Benign Market with Platform Subsidy Strategy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, January.
    6. Esteves, Rosa-Branca, 2022. "Can personalized pricing be a winning strategy in oligopolistic markets with heterogeneous demand customers? Yes, it can," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    7. Charlson, G., 2021. "Third-Degree Price Discrimination in the Age of Big Data," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2159, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    8. Hu, Li & Zhang, Weiyi & Du, Shaofu & Sun, Xiahui, 2025. "How to achieve targeted advertising with the e-commerce platform’s membership system?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    9. Rim Lahmandi-Ayed & Didier Laussel, 2024. "Random Informative Advertising with Vertically Differentiated Products," Games, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-29, March.
    10. Pizzi, Gabriele & Vannucci, Virginia & Shukla, Yupal & Aiello, Gaetano, 2022. "Privacy concerns and justice perceptions with the disclosure of biometric versus behavioral data for personalized pricing tell me who you are, I’ll tell you how much you pay. Consumers’ fairness and p," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 420-432.
    11. Sun, Ya-Fang & Zhang, Yue-Jun & Su, Bin, 2022. "Impact of government subsidy on the optimal R&D and advertising investment in the cooperative supply chain of new energy vehicles," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    12. Yue Shen & Weijun Zhong & Shue Mei, 2023. "Advertising strategies of competing firms considering consumer privacy concerns," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 2424-2437, June.
    13. Lei Yan & Yuxiang Zhang & Shue Mei & Weijun Zhong, 2024. "Personalized pricing with persuasive advertising and the value of consumer information: a duopoly framework," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1533-1562, September.
    14. Charlson, G., 2021. "Third-Degree Price Discrimination in the Age of Big Data," Janeway Institute Working Papers 2104, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    15. Tomczyk, Arkadiusz T. & Buhalis, Dimitrios & Fan, Daisy X.F. & Williams, Nigel L., 2022. "Price-personalization: Customer typology based on hospitality business," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 462-476.
    16. Noriaki Matsushima & Mark J. Tremblay, 2024. "Network compatibility and incumbent pricing regimes," ISER Discussion Paper 1265, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    17. Duan, Yongrui & Liu, Peng & Feng, Yixuan, 2022. "Pricing strategies of two-sided platforms considering privacy concerns," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    18. Siemering, Christian, 2023. "A model of endogenous targeting in duopoly," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    19. Rosa-Branca Esteves, 2021. "Can personalized pricing be a winning strategy in oligopolistic markets with heterogeneous demand customers? Yes, it can," NIPE Working Papers 08/2021, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.
    20. Jiang Wu & Linxiu Hu & Xiuli He & Xi Zheng, 2024. "Research on Logistics Cooperation Strategy of the Retailer and the Platform Based on Paid Membership System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-22, April.
    21. Li, Changying & Li, Youping & Zhang, Jianhu, 2023. "Targeted advertising with R&D rivalry," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 24-34.

  7. Rabah Amir & Huizhong Liu & Dominika Machowska & Joana Resende, 2019. "Spillovers, subsidies, and second‐best socially optimal R&D," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 21(6), pages 1200-1220, December.

    Cited by:

    1. Lili Xu & Yidan Zhang & Sang‐Ho Lee, 2024. "Effects of partial passive ownership in a successive endogenous timing game with R&D spillovers," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(1), pages 283-297, January.
    2. Buccella, Domenico & Fanti, Luciano & Gori, Luca, 2023. "The disclosure decision game: Subsidies and incentives for R&D activity," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 11-26.
    3. Michal Ramsza & Adam Karbowski & Tadeusz Platkowski, 2021. "Process R&D investment and social dilemmas," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 48(3), pages 315-336, September.
    4. Yihao Cao & Ehsan Elahi & Zainab Khalid & Ping Li & Pengsheng Sun, 2023. "How Do Intellectual Property Rights Affect Green Technological Innovation? Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Ikeda, Takeshi & Tanno, Tadanobu & Yasaki, Yoshihito, 2021. "Optimal intellectual property rights policy by an importing country," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    6. Philipp Brunner & Igor Letina & Armin Schmutzler, 2022. "Research Joint Ventures: The Role of Financial Constraints," Papers 2207.04856, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    7. Buccella, Domenico & Fanti, Luciano & Gori, Luca, 2023. "Optimal R&D disclosure in network industries," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 47(4).
    8. Buccella Domenico & Fanti Luciano & Gori Luca, 2023. "The R&D Investment Decision Game with Product Differentiation," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 23(2), pages 601-637, June.
    9. Buccella, Domenico & Fanti, Luciano & Gori, Luca, 2021. "A contribution to the theory of R&D investments," GLO Discussion Paper Series 940, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    10. Xing, Mingqing & Tan, Tingting & Wang, Xia, 2021. "Emission taxes and environmental R&D risk choices in a duopoly market," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).

  8. Pinho, Joana & Resende, Joana & Soares, Isabel, 2018. "Capacity investment in electricity markets under supply and demand uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 1006-1017.

    Cited by:

    1. Milstein, Irena & Tishler, Asher, 2019. "On the effects of capacity payments in competitive electricity markets: Capacity adequacy, price cap, and reliability," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 370-385.
    2. Vögele, Stefan & Teja Josyabhatla, Vishnu & Ball, Christopher & Rhoden, Imke & Grajewski, Matthias & Rübbelke, Dirk & Kuckshinrichs, Wilhelm, 2023. "Robust assessment of energy scenarios from stakeholders' perspectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    3. Gao, Xiang & Chan, Ka Wing & Xia, Shiwei & Zhou, Bin & Lu, Xi & Xu, Da, 2019. "Risk-constrained offering strategy for a hybrid power plant consisting of wind power producer and electric vehicle aggregator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 183-191.
    4. Jiaping Xie & Lihong Wei & Weisi Zhang & Yu Xia & Jing Li, 2019. "A Responsive Pricing Grid Operator Sourcing from Competing Generators under Uncertain Supply and Demand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-30, July.
    5. Correia-da-Silva, João & Soares, Isabel & Fernández, Raquel, 2020. "Impact of dynamic pricing on investment in renewables," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    6. Mier, Mathias, 2021. "Efficient pricing of electricity revisited," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    7. Heloísa P. Burin & Julio S. M. Siluk & Graciele Rediske & Carmen B. Rosa, 2020. "Determining Factors and Scenarios of Influence on Consumer Migration from the Regulated Market to the Deregulated Electricity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.

  9. Rosa-Branca Esteves & Joana Resende, 2016. "Competitive Targeted Advertising with Price Discrimination," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 576-587, July.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  10. António Brandão & Joana Pinho & Joana Resende & Paula Sarmento & Isabel Soares, 2016. "Welfare effects of unbundling under different regulatory regimes in natural gas markets," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 15(2), pages 99-127, August.

    Cited by:

    1. Yunus Emre Gürler & Sinan Ertemel & Matthias Finger & Muzaffer Eroğlu, 2024. "Legal and ownership unbundling in the Turkish natural gas market: A comparative analysis," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 25(1), pages 19-42, March.
    2. Dejan Zivkov & Boris Kuzman & Jonel Subic, 2023. "How to hedge extreme risk of natural gas in multivariate semiparametric value-at-risk portfolio?," E&M Economics and Management, Technical University of Liberec, Faculty of Economics, vol. 26(3), pages 128-144, September.

  11. Vitor Miguel Ribeiro & João Correia-da-Silva & Joana Resende, 2016. "Nesting Vertical And Horizontal Differentiation In Two-Sided Markets," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(S1), pages 133-145, December.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  12. Laussel, Didier & Van Long, Ngo & Resende, Joana, 2015. "Network effects, aftermarkets and the Coase conjecture: A dynamic Markovian approach," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 84-96.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  13. Rabah Amir & Jean Gabszewicz & Joana Resende, 2014. "Thematic Clubs and the Supremacy of Network Externalities," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 16(5), pages 706-729, October.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  14. Laussel, Didier & Resende, Joana, 2014. "Dynamic price competition in aftermarkets with network effects," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 106-118.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  15. Brandão, António & Soares, Isabel & Sarmento, Paula & Resende, Joana & Pinho, Joana, 2014. "Regulating international gas transport: Welfare effects of postage stamp and entry–exit systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 86-95.

    Cited by:

    1. Bermúdez, Alfredo & González-Díaz, Julio & González-Diéguez, Francisco J. & González-Rueda, Ángel M., 2016. "Gas transmission networks in Europe: Connections between different entry-exit tariff methodologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 839-851.
    2. António Brandão & Joana Pinho & Joana Resende & Paula Sarmento & Isabel Soares, 2016. "Welfare effects of unbundling under different regulatory regimes in natural gas markets," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 15(2), pages 99-127, August.

  16. Giuseppe De Feo & Joana Resende & María Eugenia Sanin, 2013. "Emission Permits Trading And Downstream Strategic Market Interaction," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 81(5), pages 780-802, September.

    Cited by:

    1. Creti, Anna & Sanin, María-Eugenia, 2017. "Does environmental regulation create merger incentives?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 618-630.
    2. Alex Dickson & Ian A. MacKenzie, 2016. "Strategic trade in pollution permits," Discussion Papers Series 554, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    3. Joana Resende & Maria Eugénia Sanin, 2009. "Optimal allocation of tradable emission permits under upstream-downstream strategic interaction," Working Papers hal-00437645, HAL.
    4. Hintermann, Beat & Peterson, Sonja & Rickels, Wilfried, 2014. "Price and market behavior in Phase II of the EU ETS," Kiel Working Papers 1962, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    5. Francisco J. André & Luis Miguel de Castro, 2020. "Market Power in Output and Emissions Trading," Games, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, October.
    6. da Silva, Patricia Pereira & Moreno, Blanca & Figueiredo, Nuno Carvalho, 2016. "Firm-specific impacts of CO2 prices on the stock market value of the Spanish power industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 492-501.
    7. Maria Eugenia Sanin, 2016. "Tradable emission permits: beyond pollution abatement motives," Documents de recherche 16-01, Centre d'Études des Politiques Économiques (EPEE), Université d'Evry Val d'Essonne.

  17. Gabszewicz, Jean J. & Resende, Joana, 2012. "Differentiated credence goods and price competition," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 277-287.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  18. Giuseppe De Feo & Joana Resende & Maria-Eugenia Sanin, 2012. "Optimal Allocation Of Tradable Emission Permits Under Upstream–Downstream Strategic Interaction," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(04), pages 1-23.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  19. Joana Resende, 2008. "The Economic Advantage of Being the “Voice of the Majority”," Journal of Media Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 158-190.
    See citations under working paper version above.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.